Anyone but another neocon. I seriously doubt the country could survive 4 more years of this idiocy. The next pres will have to find a way to undo the damage Bush has done. That is not going to be easy because he ( or she) will have to fight the Corporate Media. Luckily Bush's numbers are falling fast and most of the country is starting to wake up to what he doing.
what will you do if Hilary is elected in '08?
- Thread starter wareagle
- Start date
I think (without digging deep into voting records and positions on everything) that with either McCain or Clinton, the country would be in good hands as far as competency and communication. I think that it's good for the country to not have one party (either party) in control for too many years in a row.
Chadman said:
OMG
Untill this post I thought you had something on the ball even though we disagreed, but that statement puts you in with the likes djv and stevied and the rest of the left loonies. AMAZING.
ctownguy said:
Not that I seek approval from YOU about any of my opinions, but I am curious what in particular you disagree with in my post? I assume it has to do with your blind dismissal of Clinton's abilities, no matter what the comment is about her, but that's just a guess.
Chadman said:
I'm sure glad to learn you do not seek my approval for your opinions, because if you did it would probably be along time coming. LOL
As to answer your inquiry, hillary is a lying bittttccchhh that has nothing more than a socialistic America in mind for her policies. Talk about Bush being bad and divisive, this cu** would divide this country 10 times more than Bush. I guess you now know how I feel about her. :scared :mj02:
Like I said, I figured you would be making a stupidly biased comment that had nothing to do with my point.
And you compare her to Bush for honesty and togetherness? Wow. I see what I'm up against now.
What I said was, Hillary would be competent and a good communicator. You merely did a BS personal namecalling attack that had nothing to do with my comment. I can see why you would be touchy about Bush and his competency and divisiveness, however. It's understandable after the past six years.
You might have some credibility if you would get off your bashing chair and think about what people are posting. But I doubt it.
And you compare her to Bush for honesty and togetherness? Wow. I see what I'm up against now.
What I said was, Hillary would be competent and a good communicator. You merely did a BS personal namecalling attack that had nothing to do with my comment. I can see why you would be touchy about Bush and his competency and divisiveness, however. It's understandable after the past six years.
You might have some credibility if you would get off your bashing chair and think about what people are posting. But I doubt it.
Chadman said:
Get over yourself, competent and a good communicator makes for a great leader, your delusional.
Oh OK she is competent and communicates well, forget how she would lead us and what her beliefs are, but she's competent and can talk or scream well UNBELIEVABLE
ctownguy said:
Get over myself? I make a comment about two reasons someone would be good for an office while at the same time saying the same thing about the top Republican contender, and this is about me?
I didn't say she'd be a good leader. I'm not sure. I'm not SURE any of them would be without looking more.
You're having an argument with yourself, and losing it at that. You attribute comments to me that I don't make, and tell me that I'm responsible for them. I realize this is a complex thought to grasp, maybe you can have someone else explain it to you that sees only red colors.
