Whatever Clinton was does not make Bush any more or less a crook or an incompetent SOB then he is. That is why your argument is getting old. Cheney shoots an old goof in the face and you guys bring up Kennedy. Bush does something and you bring up Clinton. One thing does not have to do with the other. You use it as a tactic to draw the discussion away from Bush or Cheney and onto Kennedy or Clinton who had nothing to do with the question at hand.