- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,474
- 468
- 83
- 74
Can the Royals pad a bankroll just a little simply by playing against them on the RUN LINE throughout the rest of the schedule?
Some early numbers that may or may not mean anything....But man oh man does this club have a dark and gloomy look to it.
2003 Tigers
43-119
Team avg. [.240]
Team ERA [5.30] Of the 119 loses 17 were by 1[one] run.
11 first half/6 second half[please correct if wrong
2006 Royals
2-9[apr.19]
0-6 on the road
Team[ ERA 7.20] :scared :scared
Team Avg. 2.40
2006 [0-6 on the road]
2-9 verus run line..w/ all loses by 2 runs+
NEXT 3 at CHW
today
Kansas City Royals
J. Mays +1.5 +137 +285 OVER 9.5 +108
05:05 PM 972 Chicago White Sox
J. Contreras -1.5 -147 -315 UNDER 9.5 -118
Chic./Clev./Minn. possible dog fight for Central certainly sets up Royals as whipping boys.
Interleague play might help Royals[Pitt./Cinc.] but St. Lou and Hou. should be tuff.
Outside the Central those battling in the East will be more than willing to thump the Royas[ie Yanks]
If those in the know could post the {ROI} for Det. on the runline for Det. in 2003 I for one would be interested.I seem to remember a member here fading them and posting results.Sorry for not remembering his name.
This Royals club has all the looks of just a pathetic team.[Apologies to KC fans}
If Mays and Redman can't give them some inkling of a quality start here and there for the 12 Million $$$ invested in them there isn't in $$$ in KC to buy a save a diaster pitcher.
Just food for thought..
Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme beauty - a beauty cold and austere, like that of sculpture.
Bertrand Russell
British author, mathematician, & philosopher (1872 - 1970)
Some early numbers that may or may not mean anything....But man oh man does this club have a dark and gloomy look to it.
2003 Tigers
43-119
Team avg. [.240]
Team ERA [5.30] Of the 119 loses 17 were by 1[one] run.
11 first half/6 second half[please correct if wrong
2006 Royals
2-9[apr.19]
0-6 on the road
Team[ ERA 7.20] :scared :scared
Team Avg. 2.40
2006 [0-6 on the road]
2-9 verus run line..w/ all loses by 2 runs+
NEXT 3 at CHW
today
Kansas City Royals
J. Mays +1.5 +137 +285 OVER 9.5 +108
05:05 PM 972 Chicago White Sox
J. Contreras -1.5 -147 -315 UNDER 9.5 -118
Chic./Clev./Minn. possible dog fight for Central certainly sets up Royals as whipping boys.
Interleague play might help Royals[Pitt./Cinc.] but St. Lou and Hou. should be tuff.
Outside the Central those battling in the East will be more than willing to thump the Royas[ie Yanks]
If those in the know could post the {ROI} for Det. on the runline for Det. in 2003 I for one would be interested.I seem to remember a member here fading them and posting results.Sorry for not remembering his name.
This Royals club has all the looks of just a pathetic team.[Apologies to KC fans}
If Mays and Redman can't give them some inkling of a quality start here and there for the 12 Million $$$ invested in them there isn't in $$$ in KC to buy a save a diaster pitcher.
Just food for thought..
Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme beauty - a beauty cold and austere, like that of sculpture.
Bertrand Russell
British author, mathematician, & philosopher (1872 - 1970)