CIA Officer Fired for Leaking Classified Info to Media

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
obviously this is not good.....it doesn't say if the cia person was paid for this info.....they should press charges aginst this person....

WASHINGTON ? A CIA officer has been relieved of his duty after being caught leaking classified information to the media.

Citing the Privacy Act, the CIA would not provide any details about the officer's identity or assignments. It was not immediately clear if the person would face prosecution. The firing is a highly unusual move, although there has been an ongoing investigation into leaks in the CIA.

"The officer has acknowledged unauthorized discussions with the media and the unauthorized sharing of classified information," said CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano. "That is a violation of the secrecy agreement that everyone signs as a condition of employment with the CIA."

One official called this a "damaging leak" that deals with operational information and said the fired officer "knowingly and willfully" leaked the information to the media and "was caught."

The CIA officer was not in the public affairs office, nor was he someone authorized to talk to the media. The investigation was launched in January by the CIA's security center. It was directed to look at employees who had been exposed to certain intelligence programs. In the course of the investigation, the fired officer admitted discussing classified information including information about classified operations.

A senior law enforcement official said the person fired failed a polygraph test, which was given as part of the agency's internal investigation into media leaks. As to which or how many questions the person failed, the official said they didn't know.

On the subject of potential prosecution, the official said if the person admitted to leaking classified information, it would be almost negligent not to prosecute them for breaking the law. Failing a polygraph in and of itself does not qualify a person for prosecution but an admission does.

The investigation is ongoing.

A Justice Department spokesman said "no comment" on the firing. The spokesman also would not say whether the agency was looking into any criminal action against the officer. One law enforcement official said there were dozens of leak investigations under way.

A second law enforcement official confirmed said the CIA officer had provided information that contributed to a Washington Post story last year saying there were secret U.S. prisons in Eastern Europe.

Sources have told FOX News in the past that the CIA prisons/black sites story was referred to the Justice Department for investigation. That story involved the transfer of terror suspects to other countries for questioning. Some believe the CIA transferred suspects to secret prisons in countries where torture is more acceptable; secret prisons and many harsh methods of interrogation would be illegal on U.S. soil.

The administration has refused to address the question of whether it operated such secret sites that may be illegal under European law, citing the constraints of classified information.

The Washington Post report caused an international uproar, and government officials have said it did significant damage to relationships between the U.S. and allied intelligence agencies.

CIA Director Porter Goss has pressed for aggressive investigations. In his latest appearance before Congress, Goss condemned the unauthorized disclosure of information.

"The damage has been very severe to our capabilities to carry out our mission," Goss said in February, adding that a federal grand jury should be impaneled to determine "who is leaking this information."



FOX News' Bret Baier, Wendell Goler and Mike Levine and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
i saw that the a.p. used the word "allegedly" several times in their article.....i thought i read somewhere that she failed a lie detector test and then admitted to being a "leaker"....i think your article confirmed that she admitted to divulging classified "operational" information(not the name of some desk jockey that hadn`t been in the field in over 5 years)..........



finally :thumb: .....now prosecute....losing a pension just ain`t good enough....

why`d she do it?...this may not be her...but,i`d bet it is...


Mary O Mccarthy
Analyst
U.S. Government
John Kerry
$2,000 6825 Wilson Ln (map)
Bethesda, MD 20817

Michael J Mccarthy
Landscape Architect
Michael Mccarthy Associates
John Kerry
$2,000 6825 Wilson Ln (map)
Bethesda, MD 20817
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
the burglar?....lol....

i `m reading that she also contributed $5,000 to the democratic party in ohio.....no crime...but,

Mary McCarthy: … began her government service as an analyst, then manager, in CIA’s Directorate of Intelligence, holding positions in both African and Latin American analysis. (I think this was 1984 to 1991).
1991 to 2001: National Security Council

Joe Wilson: U.S. Ambassador to the (African)Gabonese Republic 1992 to 1995…
Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for African Affairs at the National Security Council from June 1997 until July 1998....

hmmmm...am i reading this right?.....they served on the nsc together with the same portfolio (africa).....and she was the cia’s africa analyst at the time ole `joe was down there?....


seeing that she worked there through 1996 there is definately a connection between the two.....

. will this connection reach all the way up to this leak?....

also some reported connections to gen. anthony zinni,wesley clark and a few others...

i`m reading that this ain`t the end of it...rockefeller from west va. could be on shaky ground....

many suspected that rockefeller was involved with these leaks since the day he admitted he leaked war plans to our enemy.....

(chris) WALLACE: Now, the President never said that Saddam Hussein was an imminent threat. As you saw, you did say that. If anyone hyped the intelligence, isn’t it Jay Rockefeller?

SEN. ROCKEFELLER: No. The — I mean, this question is asked a thousand times and I’ll be happy to answer it a thousand times. I took a trip by myself in January of 2002 to Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria, and I told each of the heads of state that it was my view that George Bush had already made up his mind to go to war against Iraq — that that was a predetermined set course which had taken shape shortly after 9/11."

a nifty way to get word to saddam to disperse any wmd paraphernalia he may have had....


"""""Meanwhile, the Justice Department says that “there [are] dozens of leak investigations under way.” It seems likely that one of them relates to the leak of the NSA’s terrorist surveillance program."""" :box2: ...finally fighting back...it`s about time...



i understand that this is the tip of the iceberg...more investigations are onging...

i hear the response already:
""g.w.b. allows scooter libby to “leak” information for “political” purposes, while the cia worker loses his job.....
but, there is a difference....the president has the legal authority to declassify information; a desk analyst at langley does not...and it can be argued that the administration was just setting the record straight...countering the mis-information from joe wilson...


on the other hand, rank-and-file employees within the ntelligence community don’t have that authority, and they’re still bound by non-disclosure agreements......


i think all this leaking shit sucks...’m no fan of political leaks by either side, but the president has the weight of the law behind him, and every chief executive has “declassified” information as he has seen fit....


republicans/the culture of corruption?.... democrats/the culture of treason?....

truthfully...partisanship aside...this is a very good thing for the country...

but,they have to prosecute.....send a message....and that includes that anti-american pulitzer prize winning "journalist" dana priest..
 
Last edited:

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
And it's not over yet. Not guilty said her lawyer. What else can he say. But there is one problem for CIA still to come. She had no clearance for this type of info. So who gave it to her if she leaked it. And the IF is growing.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
this woman & reporters all should be shot for treason.....

i don't know why people have a problem understanding that we are in a war....

it shows us how fuked up our country has gotten....

it's more important now to show up an administration.....even if it means to weaken our national security & hurt our relationships with our allies.....

very disgusting !!
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
murph...

good question...i'll have to think about it & get back to you.....

i'm not so sure it's the samething.....

revealing where secret terrorist prisons are, imo is more important to national security than revealing info about plame, who might have been outed earlier.....not justifying what scooter did, just thinking out loud....

hold tight...i'll get back to you...
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
I agree that the actual info is different. I guess the general idea of selfish wrecklessness is similar, but not the severity of the actual info.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
It's funny the three that have problems are so called liberals. But the Prez can leak what ever then say he declassified it and that makes it all OK. You know what I think we should do. Wait for the trial to see who wins.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top