Home fav system 4/28

[cisco]

Friday 4/28

System 6-0 +6.0 units
Actual W/L 6-6
Day Early games 4-4 ?1.0

Yesterday: No Games
Wednesday:
San Diego lost
Cleveland won

System pick:
San Diego GM 4
04/7 ?154 L
04/8 ?123 L
04/9 ?190 L
4/20 ?148 L
4/25 -206 L
4/26 -137 L

Detroit GM 1
4/10 -125 L
4/13 -110 L
4/15 -125 L




Day Early Game
None


Pending :
Seattle gm 3
Washington gm 1



WON
4/15 cws gm 1
4/16 det. gm 1
4/18 col. gm 1
4/19 ari ..gm 2
4/21 lad. gm 1
4/22 mil gm 1

Using Jim Fiest Lines now.
Let me know if you see any errors.


.

 

[CherryPicker]

Keep up the good work cisco :toast:

 

[Hoshtaylor]

Cisco...this line started at -116 and has already dropped to -110....and will probably still drop...what is your criteria for line movement...? Do you only use one place for lines...? If this moves under -110, it's a no play, correct...?

 

[cisco]

Wouldn't you know it, as soon as I use Fiest, he's sitting at -120 and hasn't moved.

I've bee using Pinnacle as that's where I bet. The line there is at -111 @ 3:05 pm (central time)

If Pinnacle drops below -110 it's a no play.

 

[cisco]

Game went off at -108...No play on the Padres game.

Detroit wins 9-0

 

[Hoshtaylor]

Pinnacle had it at -111 game start....so I took it...I've lost my entire bankroll on the god damn Padres this week...they are absolutely pathetic !!!!!!!!!!

 

[cisco]

Hosh- You must have placed your bet in the afternoon or early evening.
I refreshed my Pinnacle lines right up until they were taken off the board and it went off at -108

It was -109 with 15 minutes to go and went to -108 with 5 minutes to go and stayed there.

 

[wlmackey]

Cisco, love the system and the regular playes.

But the game was above -110 all day at Pinnacle.

Sounds like you are protecting the System and your record.

Whether you played them, our not.... count them toward your record, The Padres were a play and they lost me thousands.....call it what you want, I call it a BIG lose!

and most importantly SAN DIEGO sucks!

GL on your plays

 

[cisco]

wl- can't do it.
ask jack for my e-mail.

 

[nervousTic]

This system is proving out to be a wallet eater. No offense cisco.

 

[Hoshtaylor]

Guys...first and foremost...I like the system...and it works...the record proves it and it's made me a lot of money. I will say though that I lost aprox $17K on this SD series though....yet, I've hit all the other ones. The system is good, but if you're a degenerate like me and go large on "game 1" ...then you're stuck in it for the long run...and yes...it can get pretty damn expensive.

I was refreshing Pinnacle and never saw it drop below -111 up to aprox 20 minutes before the game started, because that's when I called my play in last night. Cisco...it went 44-1 or something last year...? So chalk this up as a loss for SD. Maybe that's the only "1" for this year...the system seems to work, but unfortunately, it can't predict a team that is playing well below the league's worst team of Kansas City...

Just wanted to vent and it seems as though I'm always the "1" or the exception...LOL !

But Cisco...keep it up...if we're all in this for the long run, then that's what it's all about....we just hit a speedbump....or more like a steel re-enforced concrete wall for some of us...LOL !

Anywho...GL today people....trying to chase my way out of the hole I dug myself this week....

 

[Dullamite]

I'm confused on why we are even debating about a game 4.

I thought the system was 3 games after a team had lost 3 homes games as a favorite. So when San Diego lost the third game - the record should have been 6-1 (now 7-1 with Detroit winning).

Last year the record was something like 45-1, so how long did you ride out that one loss last year.....

Dido on San Diego does blow, and yes, I lost quite a bit of money yesterday as well.

So why are we chasing S.Diego in a Game 4/5?

 

[Hoshtaylor]

I barely followed it last year....but I think it was a 3 game chase last year...this year it's a 4 game chase...correct me if I'm wrong Cisco...

 

[ces]

I'm voicing my support for your system and the many others that are viewing and understand the risks and how it works. Keep up the good work.

 

[cisco]

Hosh- You are correct about the four game chase. last year we lost Texas on game #3 and it hit on Game #4. This year I changed to a 4 game chase.

I know guys at another site that started the Padres chase a game before us (The day early game) and they were down some 47 units or so after 4 games.


Note:
I wrote to Pinnacle and asked for the closing line to prove the -108 and this is what I recieved.

Dear Sir,

We apologize, but we do not have the information you are requesting.


Regards,

Customer Service Department
Pinnacle Sports


(CaseNumber-240748_4)
-----------------------------------------------------

Can you please give the closing line for yesterday's (April 28) game between the Los Angeles Dodgers and the San Diego Padres?

Thanks-
_____________________________________

The next time San Diego is favored by -110 ore more I will be putting it up as a game #4


If you did play yesterday at -110 your total loss on this chase is 25.21 units.

-1.48
-5.10
-8.35
-10.28

 

[Its Gravy]

san diego blow-dres
dammit roar !!!!!!

 

[Jake DeNiro]

Don't know if this helps or not :shrug:

Pinnacle

Time Favorite Line O/U Money
4/27/2006 2:44:27 PM SDG - C YOUNG -R -116 (108)
4/27/2006 2:45:29 PM SDG - C YOUNG -R -116 (108) 7.5u-105
4/27/2006 2:51:28 PM SDG - C YOUNG -R -116 (108) 7.5u-109
4/28/2006 12:28:53 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -116 (108) 7.5o-106
4/28/2006 4:35:24 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -120 (112) 7.5o-106
4/28/2006 5:23:38 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -120 (112) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 5:29:37 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -118 (110) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 9:59:39 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -116 (108) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 10:00:00 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -118 (110) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 10:44:31 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -119 (111) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 10:45:12 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -123 (115) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 10:46:44 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -122 (114) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 10:47:25 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -121 (113) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 10:52:23 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -119 (111) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 10:52:43 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -118 (110) 7.5o-106
4/28/2006 11:13:04 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -118 (110) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 11:18:32 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -116 (108) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 11:19:34 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -114 (106) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 11:20:15 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -112 (104) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 11:26:48 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -113 (105) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 11:36:33 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -112 (104) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 11:37:35 AM SDG - C YOUNG -R -111 (103) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 1:16:58 PM SDG - C YOUNG -R -110 (102) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 2:15:09 PM SDG - C YOUNG -R -111 (103) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 5:09:55 PM SDG - C YOUNG -R -110 (102) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 5:38:07 PM SDG - C YOUNG -R -111 (103) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 5:42:14 PM SDG - C YOUNG -R -112 (104) 7.5o-110
4/28/2006 7:54:17 PM SDG - C YOUNG -R -111 (103) 7.5u-105
4/28/2006 7:56:20 PM SDG - C YOUNG -R -109 (101) 7.5u-105
4/28/2006 8:39:43 PM SDG - C YOUNG -R -110 (102) 7.5u-105
4/28/2006 9:09:40 PM SDG - C YOUNG -R -111 (103) 7.5u-105
4/28/2006 9:48:10 PM SDG - C YOUNG -R -109 (101) 7.5u-105
4/28/2006 9:56:01 PM SDG - C YOUNG -R -108 (100) 7.5u-105

 

[BuffaloBill]

As we have all seen, this system, just like UT's chase system, is not the way to go.

A few losses and your bankroll is gone.

I have been saying this from the start.

The system is good.............until it loses.

 

[cisco]

Jake, you helped me out immensely. It shows that I wasn'r lying.
Can I ask how you got this info?

Thanks again-

 

[Jake DeNiro]

cisco.....you're welcome, and I would have posted it either way. It's from a site I subscribe to and can't post it here. GL