sic em Tony

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
New White House press secretary continues to challenge media coverage
PDF
Bill Sammon, The Examiner
May 12, 2006 7:00 AM (11 hrs ago)

WASHINGTON - New White House Press Secretary Tony Snow continued to go after the media Thursday by accusing the Associated Press and Washington Post of unfair coverage of President Bush.


Since starting his job Monday, Snow has challenged five major news outlets in a clear signal that he will be more aggressive than his mild-mannered predecessor, Scott McClellan.

One of those outlets, CBS News, fired back on Thursday.

?The White House is clearly manipulating what I broadcast to fit their agenda,? wrote reporter Jim Axelrod on a CBS blog. ?And they are wrong to do that.?

He was responding to a White House e-mail that criticized a report by Axelrod.

?CBS News misleadingly reports that only 8 million seniors have signed up for Medicare prescription drug coverage,? the White House said. ?But 37 million seniors have coverage.?

Axelrod suggested he was the victim of ?selective editing on the part of the White House to make their own political points.?

?Very simply, the White House is cutting and pasting to make a point, something they accuse their critics of doing constantly,? he said.

?I am always open to criticism,? he added, ?but if the White House has a point to make, perhaps they should furnish the full and proper context.?

Until this week, Bush administration officials rarely issued detailed rebuttals of articles they considered unfair. But Snow, who is expected to give his first public briefing Monday, has taken a more combative stance.

This week he has hit back at The New York Times and USA Today. On Thursday, he criticized the AP for a story headlined: ?Army Guard, Reserve fall short of April recruiting goals.?

The White House countered: ?The Army National Guard, Air Force Reserve, and Marine Corps Reserve all have exceeded or achieved their year-to-date recruitment goals.?

The White House also pointed out that the Washington Post ran an editorial calling Bush?s tax cuts ?a windfall for the rich? on Thursday, the same day the paper also published a news article saying the measure would benefit the ?middle class.?

Although Snow believes that no unfair coverage should go unchallenged, he also appears determined to make administration officials more accessible to the press.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
this white house has had the worst communication practices of any white house that i could remember.....

so i think it's about time that they are changing their practices & answering true or false accusations made against them as quickly as possible....
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
I wonder why Tony has neglected Fox News in his attacks? Strange. I guess it's because Fox was nice enough to do an exclusive with him after he was asked by the administration to take over. They seemed very helpful to Mr. Snow. Odd, don't you think?

:rolleyes:

At least we'll now have fair and balanced answers coming from our new Press Secretary. That will be refreshing.

:jerkit:
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
LOL they have all of right wing radio, Fox News Network and a ton of Murdoch run newspapers and they cry because they are not being given a fair shake?
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
StevieD said:
LOL they have all of right wing radio, Fox News Network and a ton of Murdoch run newspapers and they cry because they are not being given a fair shake?


you guys crack me up......

for years all of the major news stations were friendly towards democrats & liberals (it didn't bother me because i was a liberal)....now that fox news is a prominent force in news you constantly make remarks about them like their not as balanced as cnn or msnbc.....

well guys, i'm here to tell you that they're as balanced as cnn, msnbc, the ny times, abc..etc...but who cares how the media is slanted...intelligent people can decipher the news for themselves....

and they must be doing something right because they're ratings are almost bigger than cnn & msnbc combined

stevie...

if you think that the news is balanced...you're dreaming.....& as i said before stevie you got to get away from the kennedy/kerry cartel.....

chadman....

the way politics is today...most politicans & their aids go on friendly news stations.....if you don't see that you're also dreaming....


btw...

i heard andy rooney (very long time liberal) on the imus a few times & he has said that the news has been slanted towards the liberal side for many years......

i'm waiting for stevie to say..."who cares what andy rooney says".

also no offense towards stevie & chadman....i always read what you guys have to say....but enough with the news being fair....
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
I've never said that any news organization is fair and balanced as I recall. I'm sure many are slanted, including the ones you mentioned, AR. I don't pretend to know the ins and outs of ownership and regulations on how news is delivered across the board. My point is, rarely have any administrations been so blatant with disregard for "the people" to know anything about what they do or why they do it. And rarely have any networks been so blatant in claiming to be "fair and balanced" as Fox News has while blatantly promoting a conservative platform. I would guess that one of the reasons Fox News is #1 is because they have a lot of money backing them up and advertise in a ton of places. So does CNN. They hired personalities and gave them the microphone and gave them free reign to blast away and be as controversial as possible. Including Tony Snow.

I just think it sets a dangerous precedent when an administration hires a major network talk show host to become the mouthpiece of the administration, and then he attacks all others and can control and feed his favorite network. I would see it worrisome if it were the other way around, too. I don't think that general news should generally be monopolized nor should one network have exclusivity and special treatment over general news and public policy issues. Which I would think even the most ardent conservative could see is happening here.

I'll say it FOR stevie. "Who cares what andy rooney says?!?" Since when is he a measure for anything more than being irritated with life's little difficulties?
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Andy Rooney should trim his eyebrows! And that is all I will say on that sunbject. But here is a challange for you AR. Why don't you tell me the name of one, just one, liberal slanted show on Fox?
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Snow was right but a play on words by all. Yes recruitment for year is on schedule. But April did fall short. And the numbers to meet are lower then last years. Witch they fell just short of. That's a easy fix. However those huge bonuses offered are getting more to stay that are in already. I think it's great that there paying them better.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
Chadman said:
I've never said that any news organization is fair and balanced as I recall. I'm sure many are slanted, including the ones you mentioned, AR. I don't pretend to know the ins and outs of ownership and regulations on how news is delivered across the board. My point is, rarely have any administrations been so blatant with disregard for "the people" to know anything about what they do or why they do it. And rarely have any networks been so blatant in claiming to be "fair and balanced" as Fox News has while blatantly promoting a conservative platform. I would guess that one of the reasons Fox News is #1 is because they have a lot of money backing them up and advertise in a ton of places. So does CNN. They hired personalities and gave them the microphone and gave them free reign to blast away and be as controversial as possible. Including Tony Snow.

I just think it sets a dangerous precedent when an administration hires a major network talk show host to become the mouthpiece of the administration, and then he attacks all others and can control and feed his favorite network. I would see it worrisome if it were the other way around, too. I don't think that general news should generally be monopolized nor should one network have exclusivity and special treatment over general news and public policy issues. Which I would think even the most ardent conservative could see is happening here.

I'll say it FOR stevie. "Who cares what andy rooney says?!?" Since when is he a measure for anything more than being irritated with life's little difficulties?


let me see if i can answer your post, chadman...


i agree about the bush administration being secretive......i don't like it either...i have said since the start of the iraq war that bush should have had something similiar to fdr's fireside chats....but since snow & bolten have been aboard there is a noticeable difference so far....ie...this past week as been an example of bush trying to be more open.....hopefully it will continue...

people shouldn't take fox's 'fair & balance" slogan so serious.....it's just an adverising gimmick....similiar to the ny times slogan.."all the news that's fit to print"....it doesn't mean anything.....

is fox network money more than time-warner who owns cnn or ge that owns nbc...no....fox news production of the news is very crisp....while msnbc & cnn is old & stale....also roger ailes who runs fox news is a marketing genius.....he used to run gop campaigns like begala & the guy who runs bush (funny i can't remember his name).....

who cares if snow came from fox or nbc or any other network...as long as he is competent.....bush needed to make a change..i felt sorry for the previous guy...i always thought he was in over his head (btw..i heard his mother his running for governor of texas).....

don't discount andy rooney's knowledge of journalistic history...he has been around since the morrow days......i always found rooney to be very witty...eventhough i don't agree with him often....& i agree andy rooney should trim his eyebrows (lol).....

i don't watch the news too often...i usually pick it up on the net....

what i do watch during the week when i can is....

wolf blitzer....packed with information....

brit hume....imo, the best political show on tv...

bill o'reilly.....ii know people don't like him & i sometimes disagree with him...but t's amazing how he has taken up the cause of children being raped & helped push jessica's law in many states... & has exposed some judges for being too soft...because the printmedia dislikes him & fox not many newspapers have credited him for for this action....however i have seen democrats & republican acknowledge & thank him for what he had done.....i think people are missing out on the quality of his shows...

lou dobbs.....thanks to smurphy i re-discovered dobbs..he is fast becoming my favorite show...

stevie...

to answer your question....

chris wallace (son of mike wallace) is a liberal....& greta van susterin (sp?) is a democrat...don't watch her show so i don't know how liberal she is.... fox also has a few people from public radio on their show.....

but again who cares who is a liberal or a conservative ?

and stevie...thanks for not being angry about my kennedy/kerry cartel joke.....of course i don't mean anything by it.....it just cracks me up everytime i type it...
 
Last edited:

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
AR, not sure how you can call Chris Wallace a lib. As for the few times I have seen Greta she wasn't talking politics. And hey, you can poke fun of my MA politicians all you want. And the next time you need some emergency progressive medical surgery, or are in need of someone educated at one of the top colleges in the country, we will even let you in.
But the question is why can't the administration get out all this good news the "liberal" media is hiding from us when the administration has so many outlets from which to release all this good news? :shrug:
 
Last edited:

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
Mike Wallace sdef slanted Liberal--Ditto Greta--she is only one either of Clintons will do interviews with--No doubt Fox basically slanted right--Gibson slanted very right and in my view the worst person on fox--refuse to watch him--not so much for politics but idiot in general.
All panels are fox are split--with some very ardent liberals participating.VERY rarily will you not see main topic with 2 quest following each representing one side.
As AR said after discussion with both points of view it is up to each to seperate the wheat from the chaff.
I would agree that at times Fox does not have sharpest tack in box representing liberal side(Hannity/Colmbs)--but far better than many networks that bring up their points --have one guest on same side an no mention of counter points--one of biggest abuses I saw of this was on CNN reporting on Anwar drilling--Never did see speaker with other sides views and never saw such lengthy footage of caribau and wildlife.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
The Clintons are snugged right up in bed with the Bush's and the Neocons so their opinions on Gretta don't count. And yes Mike Wallace is a liberal but how does that doesn't make his son any more a liberal than Bush a Nazi because of his granddad.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top