Public Financing of Elections - what do you think?

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Have been seeing and hearing more and more about this movement, and I think the idea has some merit. Really haven't looked into the pros and cons of the idea too much, just spent a little time on some of the Web sites that are pushing for it. An interesting group spearheading the idea includes a "bi-partisan group of former senators: Bill Bradley (D), Bob Kerry (D), William Rudman (R) and Alan Simpson (R). Some pretty heavy hitters that obviously were around for a long time and had a lot of private money thrown their way. Here is an excerpt from the Web site Just6dollars.org that highlights (the good of) the idea. Would like to hear some thoughts on this...I'm just starting to look into it.

------------------------------------

Congress would only have to spend $6 per citizen per year to publicly fund each and every election for the House, the Senate and the White House. When you consider that "pork barrel" projects cost every one of us more than $200 last year alone, it?s no contest.

Think of it. With public funding, wealthy special interests and their hired lobbyists would no longer have a commanding influence over our politics and government. Instead of begging for campaign donations, candidates would spend their time communicating with voters. Once elected, our leaders would be free to focus on our nation's challenges rather than having to worry about financing their next campaign. And there's no doubt that more of our most able leaders would run for federal office when the ability to finance a campaign isn't such a daunting obstacle.

Americans for Campaign Reform is building a nonpartisan grassroots movement of citizens who support voluntary public funding and want Congress to act now. We can make this happen. Public funding is already working in Arizona and Maine, and was just passed by the Connecticut legislature.

As citizens we can complain about the corrosive influence of our election finance system, or we can do something about it. With your help, we can mobilize citizens across the country and put pressure on Congress to enact real reform.

ACR Honorary Chairs,

Bill Bradley - Former Senator - (D) New Jersey
Bob Kerrey - Former Senator - (D) Nebraska
Warren Rudman - Former Senator - (R) New Hampshire
Alan Simpson - Former Senator - (R) Wyoming
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Sorry but I do believe the only way to get lobbyist out of government is throw them out of Wash D C. As for a plan such as above it has some good points. I wish the would flat out cap what can be spent period. And in force it.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,496
172
63
Bowling Green Ky
Heres something on slightly diff tangent but close--the people can get issues resolved--
from Britt Hume's grapevine--

Pay-Raise Politics

Pennsylvanians have voted out two Republican State Senate leaders who were behind a controversial legislative pay raise along with 15 incumbents in the House, the most defeats since 1980.

President Pro Tem Robert Jubelirer and Majority Leader David Brightbill became the first major Senate leaders to lose a primary in the state in 42 years after their opponents attacked them for orchestrating the pay raise last July. Taxpayer outrage over the bill ? passed at 2 a.m. with no debate ? forced its repeal just 4 months later.

Jubelirer, a 32-year legislator, called the electoral shake-up a "dramatic earthquake in Pennsylvania."
 

ImFeklhr

Raconteur
Forum Member
Oct 3, 2005
4,585
129
0
San Francisco
Chadman said:
Have been seeing and hearing more and more about this movement, and I think the idea has some merit. Really haven't looked into the pros and cons of the idea too much, just spent a little time on some of the Web sites that are pushing for it. An interesting group spearheading the idea includes a "bi-partisan group of former senators: Bill Bradley (D), Bob Kerry (D), William Rudman (R) and Alan Simpson (R). Some pretty heavy hitters that obviously were around for a long time and had a lot of private money thrown their way. Here is an excerpt from the Web site Just6dollars.org that highlights (the good of) the idea. Would like to hear some thoughts on this...I'm just starting to look into it.

It's an attractive idea if it fixed the problems. But it is hard for me to reconcile the free speach infringments.

So, if the government pays for the campaigns, you are forbidden by law to send out fliers or advertise on television with your own money? What about hold rallies (if paid for by private campaign money?). Seems unconstitutional to me.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top