Dubya stinks? Try worst Prez since WWII, poll sez

Pujo21

Registered
Forum Member
May 14, 2002
2,772
2
0
DAILY NEWS FRIDAY JUNE 02,2006

VOTERS aren't just dissatisfied with President Bush------they think he's the worst President since WW II, according to a shocking new OUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY Poll.

BUSH has sunk so low in the public's estimation that Richard Nixon, who resigned in disgrace after Watergate,looks good by comparison.

While 34% of the poll participants rated BUSH the worst President, Nixon got the thumbs down from 17 % of 1534 registered voters polled nationwide from May 23 thru 30.

And Democrats "just plain don't like President Bush," QUINNIPIAC Polster Maurice Carroll said.

The war in Iraq is the primary reason for Bush's unpopularity. But even the so -called RED STATES voters disapprove of BUSH by 52 %-to- 39 % margin.

Adding insult to injury, Former President Bill Clinton emerged in the poll as the second best presidents------right after Ronald Reagan.

"There's no contest for the GOP favorite: It's The Gipper, Carroll said.

But there may be a silver lining for Bush despite job-approval numbers that " remain in the cellar "

"He might finally have hit bottom", Carroll said.

CORKY SIEMASZKO
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,486
165
63
Bowling Green Ky
Don't think there is any insult or injury when your looking at poll from law school in the northeast---would expect same results if taken in hollywood.

you have consider source --you have National Org of Women being huge supporter on Bill and anti Bush--one frees million of women the others a serial molestor--go figure.

Would be interesting if they outlined their reasons for both --anti Bush--pro Clinton
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Carter still number 1 on chit list. This guy is trying to catch him. But Has time to turing it around some.
 

nervousTic

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 8, 2005
435
2
0
Try again - Bush makes Carter look like King Arthur. How many lives are Carter's hands bloodied with?
 

Marco

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 29, 2003
793
0
0
They've just had time to see how much of a true redneck Dubya is while he's added 3 trillion to a national debt that's now around 8.3 trillion.

That and all the profits sucked up by him and his cronies in war profiteering and big oil.

Thanks. :mj07:
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
nervousTic said:
Try again - Bush makes Carter look like King Arthur. How many lives are Carter's hands bloodied with?


i am starting to sour on bush, but as i have said before & i'll say it again..it's too early to judge bush's presidency...


andf if anybody doesn't think jimmy carter is the worst president since the great depression i would say that person is bias or hasn't checked the record of carter's presidency...ie..runaway inflation, waiting for hours to get your car filled with gas just to name a few things carter did wrong.....and as a matter of fact carter gave a speech from the oval office admitting that there was a "great malaise", as he put it towards his administration....

and you don't judge a presidency about the number of soldiers who were killed because then lincoln & fdr would rate very low....
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
nervousTic said:
Try again - Bush makes Carter look like King Arthur. How many lives are Carter's hands bloodied with?


carter is in no small part responsible for the shah being ousted and replaced by the mullahs in iran....

figure out the number of terrorist deaths attributable to hezbollah(iran`s terrorist arm),and you`ll have your answer...

hezbollah is the group that supposedly has sleeper cells in america,europe,canada,australis,spain...just waiting to respond if the west takes any action against iran`s nuclear ambitions....be they an attack on nuclear sites or any type of embargo or economic sanctions....

we are probably seeing some hezbollah cells being rounded up in canada,the u.s. and britain as we speak...
 

shamrock

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
8,315
329
83
Boston, MA
Carter should never have been a president, maybe a diplomat. Bush, I'm not sure yet what he should have been?
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Carter had his hands tied with Ollie North and Reagan and old man Bush making deals with terrorists behind his back.
 

ctownguy

Life is Good
Forum Member
Jul 27, 2000
3,065
16
0
SoCal
StevieD said:
Carter had his hands tied with Ollie North and Reagan and old man Bush making deals with terrorists behind his back.


WHY IN THE HELL DON'T YOU MOVE TO A SOCIALIST SOCIETY AND OPEN A BREAD LINE.

You are undoubtedly the most leftist whining puss I have ever met. You would have made a great right hand to Karl Marx and Lenin.

Comrade you need to move.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
""Jimmy Carter, upon taking office in 1977, declared that advancing “human rights” was among his highest priorities. Because America’s ally the Shah of Iran was torturing approximately 3,000 prisoners (many of them agents for Iran’s bordering neighbor the Soviet Union), Mr. Carter ostentatiously withdrew U.S. support from the Shah.

Mr. Carter ordered the Central Intelligence Agency to stop paying $4 million per year in bribes to the religious Mullahs to tone down their rhetoric. Many of these Muslim leaders disliked the Shah not because he was dictatorial but because the Shah was secular, pro-Western, and expanding the rights and equality of women.

Because Mr. Carter withdrew U.S. support and unleashed Mullah fury, the Shah was toppled. Did this liberate the 3,000 political prisoners? No. The new theocratic dictatorship of the Ayatollah Khomeini put many of these “godless Communists” up against walls alongside more than 20,000 pro-Western Iranians and liquidated them all by firing squads. Women were sent back into servitude. Citizens were arrested merely for owning satellite dishes that could tune to Western programs. And, of course, American diplomats were taken hostage.

The Soviet Union, seeing President Carter’s indecisiveness and incompetence, took advantage of the chaos he had caused to invade Iran’s eastern neighbor Afghanistan, a power grab calculated to open the way for eventual Soviet takeovers in Iran and pro-Western Pakistan.Jimmy Carter’s manly response to this outrageous Soviet aggression was to withdraw our athletes from the 1980 Olympics so that, as in Afghanistan, the Soviets could win without our opposition.


Within a year of the Shah’s ouster, Iran on its western flank was locked into the Iran-Iraq War. Just as the U.S. had sided with Stalin to defeat Hitler, in this war the U.S. sided with secular Iraq and its military dictator Saddam Hussein to quarantine Islamist fanaticism’s contagious potential to infect a fifth of the world’s population.""

throw on top of all this the fact that only months ago,this num-num was in havana kissing marxist dictator fidel castro on the lips and giving propaganda aid and comfort to this mass murderer who had far, far more than 3,000 political prisoners at the time of carter’s visit....

even the liberal washington post said,.."Jimmy Carter’s “willingness to engage with any dictator, no matter how odious, has at times been disturbing”....

he`s also hugo chavez` buddy....

too bad for the shah of iran......that he was pro-american....if he had been a marxist friend of the soviet union and renamed his nation the peoples socialist republic of iran,carter would instantly have ceased all criticism of the shah’s political prisoners and other human rights violations.....

carter has a very selective, pro-socialist definition of “human rights.”....

it`s not clear whether carter could have done more harm to america if he`d been a secret soviet agent... seems like everything he`s done since being booted by the people has been to harm our friends and give aid and comfort to our enemies...
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
The Russians found themselves bogged down in a war against Afghanistan while we supported the Taliban. The cost of that war helped the Soviets implode. Sound familiar?
 

Pujo21

Registered
Forum Member
May 14, 2002
2,772
2
0
someone makes a good point of all the trillions Dubya and his cronies have sucked up.

Now Dubya has his new scam set in place, " THE BORDERS", how many trillions will his cronies get from this new scam ??????

I think Dubya knows this IRAQ scam has run it's limit...now he's harping on this wall/border thing.

The big problem with DUBYA is no one trusts him so everytime he comes up with some money making scheme for his cronies people are reluctant.

Let's see;

1-Iraq money making scheme machine for his cronies.
2-Social security scam for coprporations,banking,wall street cronies.
3-Control of ports by arab butt buddies.
4- gasoline stick-up by arab butt buddies.

Dubya is rather transparent at this point...he needs leave and stop trying to employ ponzie schemes.
 
Last edited:

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
kosar said:
He's back to the important things today. The Gay Marriage Amendment.


it's so transparent what bush is trying to do..it's sickening. if he's trying to reach his conservative base he should take the house's stance on immigration & cut spending.

i also think that this issue should be determined by each state.
 
Last edited:

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
i`m with kosar and ar on this one.....

an obvious effort to get his base back in the fold....

maybe i`m wrong,but,i just can`t get to indignant about the gay marriage thing...with the war...iran...the borders...gasoline prices...

i realize that we are in a bit of a culture war(as we see on this board)...and maybe i`m not seeing the bigger picture...

but,i just don`t care..
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Yeah, I heard Biden talking about that yesterday...tackling the gay marriage issue and the flag burning issue and forcing votes on them in time for the election cycle. A lot of legislators don't think we need constitutional amendments on these issues at face value, and a vote no because of that thought will be construed as someone against the flag and America, or anti-traditional marriage or anti-family in political ads for the next two years.

And so it goes.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top