can anyone explain this to me?

shamrock

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
8,297
318
83
Boston, MA
My old man worked for AT&T for 40 years. Years ago the government declared this a monopoly & broke them up into several "baby bells".

Why isn't Comcast considered a monopoly, I have no other choice for cable television, they freely raise rates over and over, and the customer has no choice. I realize there is direct TV, but this isn't cable.

Any idea what the deal is here??

Shamrock
 

neverteaseit

I'd pound it
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
5,075
28
0
59
Sunny Florida and Naptown
plus it doesnt help when the feds do this also:

The Federal Communications Commission said Monday that it is planning to hike cable regulatory fees by 7% in fiscal-year 2006, nearly double the rate of inflation as measured by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Under the plan, cable operators will be expected to contribute $48.5 million, or 77 cents per subscriber, compared with 72 cents for fiscal-year 2005. Congress requires the FCC to fund its operations almost entirely through regulatory fees.

The 2006 fiscal year began last October. The FCC permits cable operators to recover regulatory fees by adding them to subscriber bills.

DirecTV Inc. and EchoStar Communications Corp., cable?s chief satellite-TV rivals, will not pay fees on a per-subscriber basis. Instead, they are to pay about $108,000 for each satellite in service, which amounts to a few million dollars. Were the two firms cable companies, they would owe the FCC about $18 million combined.

The National Cable & Telecommunications Association complained about the disparity last year.

?The fact that cable pays a disproportionately higher regulatory fee than its main competitor is simply not fair and distorts the workings of what has become a vigorously competitive marketplace,? the NCTA said.


They are supposed open up competition to lower rates and wadda ya know they are adding to the f'n cost
 

no pepper

OUTSIDE NOW!
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
1,730
151
63
62
St. Louis
Looks like Verizon is moving in gradually to challenge Comcast share. Also a company called RCN offers video in some areas. Here is a recent article that mentions the first deployment areas and price comparisons:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/06/01/more_choices_on_the_verizon_for_three_towns/

It's no monopoly. Anyone with backing can come in and compete. At one time there were probably 20+ competitive phone companies in Boston area, many of whom had their sites set on delivering video. But that was in 2001 when the wave crested. The dot com crash took a shitload of these broadband companies down with it, including the Fairpoint New England CLEC.

Those companies ran through VC money like there was no tomorrow. Ended up selling switches and equipment for pennies on the dollar. Now, the remaining competitors are heavier on voice/data than video. They set their sights on more lucrative business accounts rather than residential.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top