Saturday... Fade.. Now.. 36 - 5
- Thread starter hammer1
- Start date
Sat June 23rd, 2006.
Sat June 23rd, 2006.
Today Fade is on Texas
This one of those i would consider following
and the line has moved to Texas after last night
typical of public $$$ being wrong.
Haven't updated other fade records to have a 2nd play.
So We Play Colorado
Also my pay service is on
Toronto
Washington
Dodgers U 9
0- 2
1 - 2
1 - 2 this week with passes on 2 of 5 days
For a Bladder Burstin' 2-6 week.... a mere $500 charge
Not gonna fade em today..just have a gut feel they win 2 of 3 esp Toronto. So......if i've talked too
much and given too much info and confused every body...I have two words for ya ........... _____ _____!!!!...enuff said
Good Luck ................I'm outta here!!!!!!!!
Sat June 23rd, 2006.
Today Fade is on Texas
This one of those i would consider following
and the line has moved to Texas after last night
typical of public $$$ being wrong.
Haven't updated other fade records to have a 2nd play.
So We Play Colorado
Also my pay service is on
Toronto
Washington
Dodgers U 9
0- 2
1 - 2
1 - 2 this week with passes on 2 of 5 days
For a Bladder Burstin' 2-6 week.... a mere $500 charge
Not gonna fade em today..just have a gut feel they win 2 of 3 esp Toronto. So......if i've talked too
much and given too much info and confused every body...I have two words for ya ........... _____ _____!!!!...enuff said
Good Luck ................I'm outta here!!!!!!!!
Always Listed !!!!
Always Listed !!!!
Line may keep going to Texas...may wait till later to play it !
Always Listed !!!!
Line may keep going to Texas...may wait till later to play it !
For information only...........
For information only...........
I personally Parlayed all 3 service plays with
The Red Sox...also bought 1/2 point in parlay
Dodgers u 9 1/2.
For information only...........
I personally Parlayed all 3 service plays with
The Red Sox...also bought 1/2 point in parlay
Dodgers u 9 1/2.
37-5 or 5-37 SWEEEEEEET!!! Great call on your other service as well. You nailed it as they took 2 of 3 and very close to 3 of 3. Keep up the great work Hammer, will be looking fowrad to todays play(if one).
Thanks
shultz
Thanks
shultz
Two out of 3 Fade Parlays won yest so actual units won was almost 3-1 but gonna leave it at 2-1 lest i get accused of padding my record.
Colorado comes thru in blowout fashion yest with 6 runs in the first
against a pitcher that around here is affectionately called a" gas can"
yet $$$$$$$ went on him
So lets call it a 3 1 - night 39 - 6 now.
My comment about the pay service may shed some light as to how this is really done. My help illuminate to the naive that there is a pick phone , web site or poster where u just go and get 89% winners because u can.
Gonna go out fer brunch.......too much time in the Jacuzzi and a few too many Grey Gooses, and 3 Olives last night.
Try and get back to do some work in a few hours.
And Last.....Really ?????????????????? U mean someone who claimed they picked 87% winners would have to be a Crack addict, a 6th grade dropout and write in gibberish..........or as a life form from Atlanta inferred that i was stupid and had no clue on how to get to ""Victory Lane".........eat SH** Sonny!!! As I told u the last time u tried to put 3 words together in a sentence. "MONEY TALKS....BULLSHIT WALKS!!!!!......and last bit of advice to u Pal........almost 13,000 posts on a web site in 4 years ...............Get A Life........Victory Lane is Here Pal.......Like I told u I can give u directions................Still think I'm "Full Of Myself"
Aren't u glad u checked my post?........Just lettin' everyone know my warm and fuzzy side disappears when someone gets in my face.
Brunch it is Gentlemen....................Latah.
Damn I missed my Humility Management class again.......LOL.
Come on Jack don't move it its Gambling Related.
We haven't addressed the 70% winning percentage claims in a while so let's start with that. 70% winning percentages don't exist and never will. It is amazing how many novice and even mediocre bettors still believe 70% winners are possible. With all the variables in sports betting and the law of averages a 70% winning percentage is asinine. A solid professional handicapper wins 55-58% of the time and with some discipline and a sound money management plan, that handicapper makes a fantastic living betting on sports. But again the public seems to think 70% winners is obtainable and assumes a 55-58% percent winning percentage is worthless. There was an article published a few years ago that proved if you could pick 55% winners, make 200 bets a year while betting 5% of your $4000 starting bankroll you would accumulate 2 million dollars in a 6 year time span. Now how does that 55% winning percentage sound? The point we are trying to enforce here is if you have realistic expectations, can pick 55% winners, manage your bankroll intelligently, and wield a little self control 55% winners can lead to a great deal of prosperity.
Colorado comes thru in blowout fashion yest with 6 runs in the first
against a pitcher that around here is affectionately called a" gas can"
yet $$$$$$$ went on him
So lets call it a 3 1 - night 39 - 6 now.
My comment about the pay service may shed some light as to how this is really done. My help illuminate to the naive that there is a pick phone , web site or poster where u just go and get 89% winners because u can.
Gonna go out fer brunch.......too much time in the Jacuzzi and a few too many Grey Gooses, and 3 Olives last night.
Try and get back to do some work in a few hours.
And Last.....Really ?????????????????? U mean someone who claimed they picked 87% winners would have to be a Crack addict, a 6th grade dropout and write in gibberish..........or as a life form from Atlanta inferred that i was stupid and had no clue on how to get to ""Victory Lane".........eat SH** Sonny!!! As I told u the last time u tried to put 3 words together in a sentence. "MONEY TALKS....BULLSHIT WALKS!!!!!......and last bit of advice to u Pal........almost 13,000 posts on a web site in 4 years ...............Get A Life........Victory Lane is Here Pal.......Like I told u I can give u directions................Still think I'm "Full Of Myself"
Aren't u glad u checked my post?........Just lettin' everyone know my warm and fuzzy side disappears when someone gets in my face.
Brunch it is Gentlemen....................Latah.
Damn I missed my Humility Management class again.......LOL.
Come on Jack don't move it its Gambling Related.
We haven't addressed the 70% winning percentage claims in a while so let's start with that. 70% winning percentages don't exist and never will. It is amazing how many novice and even mediocre bettors still believe 70% winners are possible. With all the variables in sports betting and the law of averages a 70% winning percentage is asinine. A solid professional handicapper wins 55-58% of the time and with some discipline and a sound money management plan, that handicapper makes a fantastic living betting on sports. But again the public seems to think 70% winners is obtainable and assumes a 55-58% percent winning percentage is worthless. There was an article published a few years ago that proved if you could pick 55% winners, make 200 bets a year while betting 5% of your $4000 starting bankroll you would accumulate 2 million dollars in a 6 year time span. Now how does that 55% winning percentage sound? The point we are trying to enforce here is if you have realistic expectations, can pick 55% winners, manage your bankroll intelligently, and wield a little self control 55% winners can lead to a great deal of prosperity.
Well said hammer1. I bet only 1% of bankroll.
I know it's still early but will you be around for the football season?
I know it's still early but will you be around for the football season?
hammer1 said:
go read that stupid shiit sonny just posted today about being a vampire, he is seriously mental and a head case!
Whats EE ..EL PASO ELECTRIC.only thing i can think of down there in the wasteland of Texas. Thought we buried the Hatchet..ur apology was accepted..case closed as far as i'm concerned.
Anyway.....Gonna go """" with""" the service plays again today instead of fading them
here they are:
Yankees G 1 Under 9.5
Red Sox Over 10.5
San Francisco..Cain looks like a Stud!!
Not enuff time to do Fade #1 Selection....................
Anyway.....Gonna go """" with""" the service plays again today instead of fading them
here they are:
Yankees G 1 Under 9.5
Red Sox Over 10.5
San Francisco..Cain looks like a Stud!!
Not enuff time to do Fade #1 Selection....................
Cisco..used to be mediocre in Football.but since off-shores showed up 15 or so years ago and the advent of all kinds of teasers probably 75% of my bets are what are termed ""Sucker"" bets.....TEASERS.they have put me in the PLUS $$$ column every year since then.
hammer1 said:
you posted this--
"eat SH** Sonny!!! As I told u the last time u tried to put 3 words together in a sentence. "MONEY TALKS....BULLSHIT WALKS!!!!!......and last bit of advice to u Pal........almost 13,000 posts on a web site in 4 years ...............Get A Life........Victory Lane is Here Pal.......Like I told u I can give u directions................Still think I'm "Full Of Myself"
Aren't u glad u checked my post?........Just lettin' everyone know my warm and fuzzy side disappears when someone gets in my face.
Brunch it is Gentlemen....................Latah.
Damn I missed my Humility Management class again.......LOL.
Come on Jack don't move it its Gambling Related.
We haven't addressed the 70% winning percentage claims in a while so let's start with that. 70% winning percentages don't exist and never will. It is amazing how many novice and even mediocre bettors still believe 70% winners are possible. With all the variables in sports betting and the law of averages a 70% winning percentage is asinine. A solid professional handicapper wins 55-58% of the time and with some discipline and a sound money management plan, that handicapper makes a fantastic living betting on sports. But again the public seems to think 70% winners is obtainable and assumes a 55-58% percent winning percentage is worthless. There was an article published a few years ago that proved if you could pick 55% winners, make 200 bets a year while betting 5% of your $4000 starting bankroll you would accumulate 2 million dollars in a 6 year time span. Now how does that 55% winning percentage sound? The point we are trying to enforce here is if you have realistic expectations, can pick 55% winners, manage your bankroll intelligently, and wield a little self control 55% winners can lead to a great deal of prosperity."
I was referring to what you posted. You referenced SONNY, and 13,000 posts in a year. So who were you talking about b/c I assumed you meant that 'other' site, EE. But I guess you werent-so who were you talking about?
this is what i mean, you wont tell us where you get Fade #1, and today you say you are gone now for the day, and we cant get the plays. why not just post where you get them or help us figure out where? We would like to play the original fade's plays but cant now because you are gone for the day.
