Is Cheney Betting On Economic Collapse?

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
The Veep's Curious Investment Portfolio

Is Cheney Betting On Economic Collapse?
By MIKE WHITNEY

Wouldn't you like to know where Dick Cheney puts his money? Then you'd know whether his "deficits don't matter" claim is just baloney or not.

Well, as it turns out, Kiplinger Magazine ran an article based on Cheney's financial disclosure statement and, sure enough, found out that the VP is lying to the American people for the umpteenth time. Deficits do matter and Cheney has invested his money accordingly.

The article is called "Cheney's betting on bad news" and provides an account of where Cheney has socked away more than $25 million. While the figures may be estimates, the investments are not. According to Tom Blackburn of the Palm Beach Post, Cheney has invested heavily in "a fund that specializes in short-term municipal bonds, a tax-exempt money market fund and an inflation protected securities fund. The first two hold up if interest rates rise with inflation. The third is protected against inflation."

Cheney has dumped another (estimated) $10 to $25 million in a European bond fund which tells us that he is counting on a steadily weakening dollar. So, while working class Americans are loosing ground to inflation and rising energy costs, Darth Cheney will be enhancing his wealth in "Old Europe". As Blackburn sagely notes, "Not all bad news' is bad for everybody."

This should put to rest once and for all the foolish notion that the "Bush Economic Plan" is anything more than a scam aimed at looting the public till. The whole deal is intended to shift the nation's wealth from one class to another. It's also clear that Bush-Cheney couldn't have carried this off without the tacit approval of the thieves at the Federal Reserve who engineered the low-interest rate boondoggle to put the American people to sleep while they picked their pockets.

Reasonable people can dispute that Bush is "intentionally" skewering the dollar with his lavish tax cuts, but how does that explain Cheney's portfolio?

It doesn't. And, one thing we can say with metaphysical certainty is that the miserly Cheney would never plunk his money into an investment that wasn't a sure thing. If Cheney is counting on the dollar tanking and interest rates going up, then, by Gawd, that's what'll happen.

The Bush-Cheney team has racked up another $3 trillion in debt in just 6 years. The US national debt now stands at $8.4 trillion dollars while the trade deficit has ballooned to $800 billion nearly 7% of GDP.

This is lunacy. No country, however powerful, can maintain these staggering numbers. The country is in hock up to its neck and has to borrow $2.5 billion per day just to stay above water. Presently, the Fed is expanding the money supply and buying back its own treasuries to hide the hemorrhaging from the public. Its utter madness.

Last month the trade deficit climbed to $70 billion. More importantly, foreign central banks only purchased a meager $47 billion in treasuries to shore up our ravenous appetite for cheap junk from China.

Do the math! They're not investing in America anymore. They are decreasing their stockpiles of dollars. We're sinking fast and Cheney and his pals are manning the lifeboats while the public is diverted with gay marriage amendments and "American Celebrity".

The American manufacturing sector has been hollowed out by cutthroat corporations who've abandoned their country to make a fast-buck in China or Mexico. The $3 trillion housing (equity) bubble is quickly loosing air while the anemic dollar continues to sag. All the signs indicate that the economy is slowing at the same time that energy prices continue to rise.

This is the onset of stagflation; the dreaded combo of a slowing economy and inflation.

Did Americans really think they'd be spared the same type of economic colonization that has been applied throughout the developing world under the rubric of "neoliberalism"?

Well, think again. The American economy is barrel-rolling towards earth and there are only enough parachutes for Cheney and the gang.

The country has lost 3 million jobs from outsourcing since Bush took office; more than 200,000 of those are the high-paying, high-tech jobs that are the life's-blood of every economy.

Consider this from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) June edition of Foreign Affairs, the Bible of globalists and plutocrats:

"Between 2000 and 2003 alone, foreign firms built 60,000manufacturing plants in China. European chemical companies, Japanese carmakers, and US industrial conglomerates are all building factories in China to supply export markets around the world. Similarly, banks, insurance companies, professional-service firms, and IT companies are building R&D and service centers in India to support employees, customers, and production worldwide." ("The Globally integrated Enterprise" Samuel Palmisano, Foreign Affairs page 130)

"60,000 manufacturing plants" in 3 years?!?

"Banks, insurance companies, professional-service firms, and IT companies"?

No job is safe. American elites and corporate tycoons are loading the boats and heading for foreign shores. The only thing they're leaving behind is the insurmountable debt that will be shackled to our children into perpetuity and the carefully arranged levers of a modern police-surveillance state.

Welcome to Bush's 21st Century gulag; third world luxury in a Guantanamo-type setting.

Take another look at Cheney's investment strategy; it tells the whole ugly story. Interest rates are going up, the middle class is going down, and the poor dollar is headed for the dumpster. The country is not simply teetering on the brink of financial collapse; it is being thrust headfirst by the blackguards in office and their satrapies at Federal Reserve.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
The Neocons are at war with the American working class. Their goal is not to bring democracy to Iraq but to break the middle class. As soon as that debt, that we are adding to the tune of a billion dollars a day in Iraq, reaches the point where it cannot possibly be paid look out below!
 

blgstocks

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2005
3,181
12
0
So. Cal
Money Magazine ran an article on who is betting that the Dollar is going to hit hard, their were 4 or 5 recognizeable names but the one i can remember is Warren Buffet. He has said that he thinks the dollar is ripe to lose big time value. He just bought up a huge Isreal toolmaking company.
There are alot of other smart money guys that are betting on the dollar getting stronger though.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
Would say it would be wise to hedge against any adverse possibilties.

and a little on Stevies--"The Neocons are at war with the American working class."

You can always move to ultra liberal state like New Jersey--who takes great care of working class with highest property taxes in U.S. and their ultra liberal gov Corsine solution now is to raise sales tax from 6% to 7%--- While his liberal constituents claim only a 1% increase--a few "smarter" folks have brought it to their attention it's actual about a 16 % increase. ;
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Not sure what the crooks in New Jersey have to do with the Neocons and the debt they are raking up. You can live in New Jersey or East Bumfvck and you will still feel the wrath of the Neocon debt. Call them taxes or calll them fees or call it inflation it all hurts the working class the hardest.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
42,927
2,075
113
On the course!
Has the guy who wrote that piece been on vacation for 30 years? This shit didn't just start!
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
yyz said:
Has the guy who wrote that piece been on vacation for 30 years? This shit didn't just start!

I'm not sure what you are referring to. This article is dealing almost entirely with Bush-era economic effects and where Dick Cheney is putting his investment money - which gives you an idea of where he thinks the economy is headed. We certainly did not have the debt escalation in the previous administration.

Dogs, I note that you criticize New Jersey Libs for their high property taxes and raising the sales tax. Half of the proceeds from the sales tax increase is going directly to property tax relief, according to Corzine. I'm not saying that is appropriate economic policy, but half of the reason for the increase is to address the first "problem." I heard on Sean Hannity's show yesterday from a guy from Pennsylvania who owns property on the Jersey Shore that said this was a great plan for him - as he cannot vote on any of the issues, but the Libs are addressing the high property tax issue for landowners. He was a republican, but commended the Libs on this attempt to help those that own property - who are really getting socked, as you mention.

You also mention that some "smarter folks" are saying the increase is about 16%. Of course your spin is that the conservatives are smart and the Libs are not, which is constant, but maybe you can share some figures and footnotes from the "smarter folks." I'd guess the actual figure to be somewhere in the middle at the end of the day, but I certainly don't know.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
With feds funds to states going down. Guess what? With gas prices up and states saying they will spend millions more on fuel. Guess what? N J Won't be last state needing help. Of course some states don't give a chit.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
42,927
2,075
113
On the course!
Yeah, Bush is the "guy" in the office selling us down the river today. Yesterday it was this guy, tomorrow it will be that guy.

You really have to be insane if you think the guy in office makes a bit of difference as to what really happens in the political/economic world anymore.

The families who run the world will continue to do so, and the rest of us will dance to their desires.
 

Jabberwocky

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2006
3,491
29
0
Jacksonville, FL
Where is a response to this by the "conservatives" on this board? Remind what "conservatives" conserve? When hit with the hard economic facts of this administration and the devestating consequences of their policies, the idiotic emotional issues like gay hating, flag burning, and "activist judges" used by the right to enlist middle class americans who think they are in the republican club ring a little hollow. The silence is deafening.
 

Jabberwocky

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2006
3,491
29
0
Jacksonville, FL
"Yeah, Bush is the "guy" in the office selling us down the river today. Yesterday it was this guy, tomorrow it will be that guy."


I generally agree that the power structures that be remain election after election. But to equivocate between the economic policies of the neocons and the Clinton administration? Are you kidding me? Look at the record. After 12 years of "conservative", trickle down economics, we were 4 trillion in debt and heading south fast. After 8 years of the "tax and spend" liberals in office the deficit had been cut to less than half the inherited debt with budget surplusses as far as the eye could see. The current administration has EXPANDED government and engaged in deficit spending the likes of which has never been seen by any country in the history of the world. This is not by accident. These guys are not good old red, white and blue Americans looking out for the interests of the United States. They wave the flag all the while serving the interests of multinational corporations who are plundering this country for their own short sighted, short term economic gain.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Cut Taxes, Cut Taxes, Now you don't have enough money to run the show. So the conservatives say cut spending. Really. That's what they say. Really. But they don't believe it.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
Do you believe this----or would you rather rather cut all those corporate profits to the bone via litigation-federal intervention ect.
Then answer this one--If they are not getting sufficient taxes from corps--guess whose taxes they raise to make up deficeit--
--if not for 911-the war"s"-hurricane expenditures--the surplus would be unbelievable.



Unexpected tax revenue to shrink U.S. budget deficit

E-mail | Print | | Disable live quotes By MarketWatch
Last Update: 3:35 PM ET Jul 8, 2006


NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- An unexpected spike in revenue from corporate taxes, individual stock market profits and executive bonuses is curbing the projected budget deficit this year, according to a media report.
The White House on Tuesday is expected to say that tax receipts are about $250 billion higher than they were a year ago, rising twice as fast as the administration forecast, the New York Times reported Saturday.
As a result, the budget deficit will be about $100 billion less than the White House predicted six months ago, the paper said.
The tax receipt windfall has been building for months, but its size and effect on the deficit surprised budget analysts, given the high costs for the war in Iraq and hurricane relief.
Congressional analysts told the Times that the greater-than-expected tax receipts could cut the deficit to $300 billion this year from $318 billion a year ago.
Corporate taxes that have nearly tripled since 2003, executive bonuses, and higher individual taxes on stock market profits are fueling the spike in tax revenue, the paper reported.
The Congressional Budget Office said Friday that corporate tax receipts rose 26% for the nine months ending in June compared with the year-ago period.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Ex-bonus take form pensions. Example ATT top 1100 at this company as pension stands now get 42% of the take. The other 180000 workers split the remaining 58%. Yet this is where ATT said they are looking to cut cost. Who gets screwed. Not the CEO he gets 6 mill a year. At least that was how it was reported in USA last week. We are still waiting to see if all the extra money they say is coming really appears.
 

blgstocks

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2005
3,181
12
0
So. Cal
Dogs that bark brings up a good point that i hadnt thought about -
though it maybe the presidents fault, the wars in iraq have cost us billions upon billions,

and hurricane katrina, even though the spending on it isnt satisfactory is quite a bit as well and 911 was a big hit as well along with afghanistan invasion, even though im sure some on this board would say katrina and 911 were planned by bush as well to somehow screw up all the way to becoming rich but that is another point

Clinton was never faced with any of these issues that needed the kind of spending Bush needed.

By the way, if you guys wanted to do something about it, Money magazine had a few good tips. Invest in big blue chips like GE and Catapillar who do MOST of their business over seas and with a falling economy/dollar their items can become less expensive and still turn the same profit. If you tryuly believe the article above and you really think this administration is sending our economy/country to hell in a handbasket then you guys could be making money off of it instead of just complaining.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
I understand DJV and am against the golden parachutes prob more than most--from humanitarian standpoint would much prefer compensation being divied out to little guy instead--but from tax revenue standpoint empasizes why top 25% of wage earners pay bout 90% of taxes--and another reason why I discount arguement of rich not paying fair share of taxes--while we now have 1/3 of our population paying "no" taxes. Quite a disturbing evolution that we are approaching more non tax payors with basically the same political affiliation?

Table 1: Growing Share of Zero-Tax Filers


Number of Zero-tax Filers
(in Millions)
Zero-tax Filers as a Percentage of All Filers

1980
18.6
19.8%

1985
16.7
16.5%

1990
21.5
19.0%

1995
26.7
22.6%

2000
29.9
23.1%

2004 est.
44.0
33.0%

Source: IRS Statistics of Income and Tax Foundation estimate.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Would we be right in saying many none tax payers are the rich with the best lawyers. In fact DTB did't they use to run a list of companies that didn't pay taxes because they used every trick in the books. I have not see it for a while and your better with the computer then Me maybe you can find that.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top