I think that you can thank BTJ for that word being censored on this site. :142smiliemoe777 said:since when is ******** a censored word??wtf..but you can blasts peoples religon or see porn on here,but you can type in ********
I think that you can thank BTJ for that word being censored on this site. :142smiliemoe777 said:since when is ******** a censored word??wtf..but you can blasts peoples religon or see porn on here,but you can type in ********
This is straight from 'Art of War'. You simply can't win a pre-emptive war that gets prolonged more than a few years. Wars like Iraq and Vietnam need to be won quickly. They are a sideshow and Americans don't directly feel like their life is at stake. We eventually get tired of the deaths and begin to feel the fighting isn't worth it. Not all of us, but most of us. These kinds of wars need to be won quickly and convincingly or not fought at all. Our leaders show complete incompetence when they don't recognize this.DOGS THAT BARK said:Show me a war that was won with words--apears Japan would point to the greater the destruction the more their willing to listen.
AND on Viet Nam ONCE AGAIN
U.S. troops deaths
1967>9,378
1968>14,594
1969>9,414
1970>4,221
1971>1,380
Now people for the last time LOOK at these #'s
Can anyone but an utter fool come up with any other conclusion that the liberals and press were solely responsible from snatching defeat from the jaws of victory in Viet Nam?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.