--You have given out too much reputation in the last 24 hours, please try again later--
??????????????? :shrug:
:SIB
:bsflag
:nono:
??????????????? :shrug:
:SIB
:bsflag
:nono:
WTF? Why do I keep getting this message?
- Thread starter Agent 0659
- Start date
you can't give reputation points to the same people over and over. Trust me I have been trying to give you a negative for about a month.
Speaking of comments: I have to guess this is you agent:
YEAH, KICK THIS DEUCHE BAGGGGG
:142smilie :142smilie :142smilie
Speaking of comments: I have to guess this is you agent:
YEAH, KICK THIS DEUCHE BAGGGGG
:142smilie :142smilie :142smilie
I found some info for those curious:
The tooltip text changes for certain levels of points. The list of these points and the accompanying tooltip text is below:
<-50 = [User] is infamous around these parts
-050 = [User] can only hope to improve
-010 = [User] has a little shameless behaviour in the past
0000 = [User] is an unknown quantity at this point
0010 = [User] is on a distinguished road
0050 = [User] will become famous soon enough
0100 = [User] has a spectacular aura about
0200 = [User] is a jewel in the rough
0400 = [User] is a glorious beacon of light
0700 = [User] is a splendid one to behold
1000 = [User] is a name known to all
1500 = [User] has much to be proud of
2000 = [User] has a brilliant future
3000 = [User] has a reputation beyond repute
Why do some member's reps count for more points than others?
The amount of points that you give or take from a member's reputation count is determined by your reputation "power". By default the power is 1, however, you receive one extra point of reputation power
* per 1,000 positive reputation points received,
* per 4,000 counted posts, and
* per complete year that you have been a member of the Forums.
I tried to rate someone and it said "You must spread some reputation around before giving it to xxxx again".
There is what is known as a reputation "spread" in effect. This is a minimum number of members you must give reputation to before you may rate the same member again. At the time of writing this number is 6.
You will also receive an error if you try to rate more than 6 members within a 24 hour period
The tooltip text changes for certain levels of points. The list of these points and the accompanying tooltip text is below:
<-50 = [User] is infamous around these parts
-050 = [User] can only hope to improve
-010 = [User] has a little shameless behaviour in the past
0000 = [User] is an unknown quantity at this point
0010 = [User] is on a distinguished road
0050 = [User] will become famous soon enough
0100 = [User] has a spectacular aura about
0200 = [User] is a jewel in the rough
0400 = [User] is a glorious beacon of light
0700 = [User] is a splendid one to behold
1000 = [User] is a name known to all
1500 = [User] has much to be proud of
2000 = [User] has a brilliant future
3000 = [User] has a reputation beyond repute
Why do some member's reps count for more points than others?
The amount of points that you give or take from a member's reputation count is determined by your reputation "power". By default the power is 1, however, you receive one extra point of reputation power
* per 1,000 positive reputation points received,
* per 4,000 counted posts, and
* per complete year that you have been a member of the Forums.
I tried to rate someone and it said "You must spread some reputation around before giving it to xxxx again".
There is what is known as a reputation "spread" in effect. This is a minimum number of members you must give reputation to before you may rate the same member again. At the time of writing this number is 6.
You will also receive an error if you try to rate more than 6 members within a 24 hour period
It means you are spending a LOT of time giving out reputation so you can give repeat negative to some people, sad really.
Yea you deuche bag...that was the point of my post..I couldn't figure out what it meant
Find out anymore intersting facts about your mail order bride this week?
Listen wang lips, you are the one who asked why you keep getting the message.
Just becasue your mom pays Jack to hang around with you now and then and pretend like you have one friend in the entire world doesn't mean the rest of us are on the payroll.
Just becasue your mom pays Jack to hang around with you now and then and pretend like you have one friend in the entire world doesn't mean the rest of us are on the payroll.
By the way, how hard is it really to figure out this was a rhetorical question? :shrug:
rhe?tor?i?cal
Pronunciation: ri-'tor-i-k&l, -'t?r-
Variant(s): also rhe?tor?ic /ri-'tor-ik, -'t?r-/
Function: adjective
1 a : of, relating to, or concerned with rhetoric b : employed for rhetorical effect; especially : asked merely for effect with no answer expected <a rhetorical question
:sadwave:
Yea, either that or a question asked by a dumb ****, could go either way.
In this case I'll go with the latter.
In this case I'll go with the latter.
