Wk. 2...(hopefully) blow-outs!

MrChristo

The Zapper
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2001
4,414
5
0
Sexlexia...
4-2 (+1.87)

Not sure I can tell anyone here to take this seriously or not, 'cause I'm struggling to believe it myself.
Week 2, notorious for big over-reactions, big favs aren't the way to a solid gold house and a rocket car at the best of times, and here I am laying about 60 points!!!! :scared
Oh man...

Everyone loves a good trend, so here goes... ;)

Since '89 League: 2-15 ats (Av. loss 20.4!) away 10+ dog, off any ats loss as a home fav of 3 or less, if this weeks opp was last away. [Cleveland & Tenn]
(0-3 last season; SL 28-45 Indi @ +13.5, Jets 3-16 NE @ +10, Oak 3-22 Denv @ +13)

Cinci -10.5 (1.95)
SD -11.5 (1.95)


Basically, these 2 teams are every bit as bad as they looked this week, and SD/Cinci (happy to be back home it seems) really should be able to run away with big wins.
They wil need to of course, given the -10/-10.5 spreads, but I think I'd take both up to 14!

As expected Cleveland didn't fire a shot on the weekend. Frye was hurried all day, was sacked 14 times!!...threw for just 4.9 y/p with 2 picks. The running game produced just 41 yards in 13 attempts (minus scrambles), and that was against a below par NO D.
Cinci's main concern is their pass D, but I just don't think Frye will have the protection/time/options (Jurevicius out now too) or talent to take advantage.
Rudi Johnson will have another massive day given the Browns allowed 150 yards rushing and Palmer will have multiple options (the Housh should be back)
Cleveland do have a very good recent record @ Cinci, but I just can't see them being able to score enough to keep it close.

Same goes for the Titans. No stability @ QB at all. A rookie and a guy still learning the system who has been a bust for the last few years anyway! Against this hungry SD defense it will be a long and ugly day I suspect.
SD's running game will be outstanding all year, and Rivers definately showed enough today to suggest he can make big throws when necessary.
Add that the Chargers are 14-3-1 last 18 v. losing teams, and we should have another blow-out.

Chicago -8.5 (1.93)

League: 10-4 (12-2 this no...av. win 20.4!!) home 7+ fav, off a 21+ ats win as away fav of 7 or less, if opp was last a 'dog. [Chic]
(1-1 last season; Sea 41-3 SF as -16, Pits 35-21 Det as -16)

League: 1-12-3 (1-15 this no!...Av. loss 22.1!!) away 7+ dog, off any ats win as home dog, if opp won by at least 7 ats as any away fav. [Det]
(0-1 in 2005; Jets 3-30 Caro as +9)

...there's 2 common games in those trends, so combined this is a 25-3 ats (at this number) situation!! :SIB

Effectively both say the same thing. Chicago are playing very well, winning big as an away fav, and the line is too low because Det performed above expectations, but they are still rubbish, as witnessed by them being a home dog in the first place.
Grossman threw for over 10 y/p, the running gme was solid, the defense always solid...The Lions are still very much rebuilding and will struggle, esp. on the road this season.
Specifically, in this game I doubt if they will have any success on the ground at all (they had just 39 rushing yards last week), which will inevitably lead to a pick or 2, or 3.
...oh, and anyone who doesn't believe things aren't quite right in the Lions camp....Marinelli spent the previous 10 seasons coaching Tampa Bay's defensive line and coached the unit in place of Joe Cullen, who was arrested twice recently on suspicion of drunken driving and because police say he was driving nude. Cullen will be back to coach in the next game at Chicago, Marinelli said.
I rest my case. :mj07:
Game of the week for me.

Indi -13 (1.95)

League: 10-1 (Av. win 20.2) home 10+ fav, off any ats win as away fav of 3 or less, if opp is off a 7+ ats loss. [Indi]
(2-0 last season; Den 27-0 Jets as -13, SD 34-10 Oak as -11)

League: 1-8 (Av. loss 24.9!) away 10+ dog, off a 7+ ats loss as a home dog, if total is >44.5. [Houston]

Again, 1 common game here, so a combined 17-2 trend.

Probably my least favourite pick of the week. It's tough taking Indi as a big fav when they will have one of the most negative rushing differentials this season...but, having said that, they did play the Giants who are one of the very best running teams...and also it didn't matter!
Pretty strong trend, saying that Indi did the job last week, and should go on their merry way playing a crap team at home who under performed last week anyway...and the high total shows what we already know, that Houston's D is crap. McNabb 300+ yards, 3 TD's...over 5 y/r, so Manning will have fun, and hopefully they can get something going on the ground.
One thing Indi's D is good at is rushing the passer, and Carr was sacked 5 times last week, and continues to throw poor balls and make bad decisions under pressure.
Indi dominated the meeting last year...won by just 14, but fumbled twice. They had 26-11 FD's and 419-209 yards...besides, 14 will do the trick here anyway.

Minni +2 (1.99)

League: 18-1-1!! (Av. WIN 6.4...16-4 SU!!) home dog of 3 or less, off a SU win of 3 or less as an away dog of <7. [Min]
10-0 (9-1 SU!!...Av. WIN 10.9!!) if the total is <40.

I can't really understand why Carolina are favs in this game anyway? Coming off a terrible performance, getting completely out-played at home, are people banking on the 'bounce-back' factor here??
Delhomme threw for just 4.7 y/p and was sacked 4 times...which isn't likely to improve in a hurry, given their starting left guard is now out for the season.
I know Minni are learning a new system and aren't the greatest of teams themselves, but they do have a solid running game, Brad Johnson doesn't make mistakes and can make a big play when needed, and their defense looks to have improved significantly.
I don't think they deserve to be home dogs here...hopefully a +3 will be available somewhere...but very tempted by the ML as it is.

Denver -10.5 (1.94)

League: 3-9 (1-11 this no...av. loss 18.2) away 10+ dog off a 10+ ats home loss, if opp is also off a 10+ ats loss. [KC]

Basically says that they are crap and the line is too low because of Denver's (non!) performance last week....and I agree.
KC are about the worst team in football right now! A makeshift o-line in progress, a terrible defense and now a no. 2 QB....and bascially Denver moved the ball easily enough, but turned it over 5 times.
They won't have to worry about Plummer throwing it away this week, because he might not have to throw it at all!
The Broncos ran for 161 yards @ 6.4 y/r! But 2 early fumbles lead to Jake playing catch-up and forcing silly throws.
If they protect the ball this week, they should be able to run up a big enough score to cover the -10 easily.
They've won the last 5 home meetings by an av. of 13.8 ppg, inc. a 20 point win last year.


Good Luck all :cool:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ajoytoy

amich1

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 27, 2003
209
0
0
the 3 team 10 pt teaser definitely looks juicy this week....
 

MrChristo

The Zapper
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2001
4,414
5
0
Sexlexia...
Christo, thanks for the valuable information! Hey, what does 1-11 this no mean? Thanks in advance.

Take the Chicago situation for example, W&W...

League: 10-4 ats but 12-2 at this number...

In the specific situation, 14 teams went 10-4 ats...but 2 of the teams won by more than this [Chicago] spread...

...(ie. Pitsburgh won by 14 points in this situation last season, but their spread was -16...so they lost ats, but would have won ats at his number (-8.5))

[no. = 'number' too, in my shorthand anyway!]

I hope that makes sense...:mj06:

Hey, Pawa...Hope you didn't get out-teased by those pesky Pats last week mate...'twas a very unpopular result! :sadwave:

Might throw in a 7-teamer myself...these and Miami (who I'm waiting to drop to -6 to play.) :cool:
 

moe777

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 8, 2003
3,568
7
0
east coast
gl mcCristo
the vikes impressed me last week .im also surprised at how much they were willing to throw the deep ball.kudos to brad johnson.chester taylor will be a stud ,he looked very good also.oline was good.
if i had to play this game id be on the vikes.
panthers sufferd some key injuries last week,and if steve smith is out i will be playing the vikes also..they are a diffrent team without him in the lineup.it hard to see one of the superbowl faves start 0-2 but it does happen,especialy b/c of injuries.
denver will roll.
 

MrChristo

The Zapper
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2001
4,414
5
0
Sexlexia...
When in doubt, plug away at another big fav...:142smilie

Miami -6 (1.98)

League: 13-2-2 (Av. win 8.4) home 3+ fav off a 10+ SU loss as away 3- dog, if total <40 and opp is off any ats win. [Miami]
6-0 (Av. win 12.3) if opp won ats away.

Shows that Buffalo are being over-rated after over-performing (on the score-baord at least!!) last week, and Miami will look to bounce back, esp. on D.
Buffalo only scored 10 points after the opening fumble return, and managed just 12 FD's for the game, and I think Miami's D is better still.
The 'Phins should be able to get something going on the ground this week to take the pressure of Culpepper, so he can manage the game, rather than trying to make big plays and forcing poor throws.
Miami won the home meeting last year 24-23, but Buff were 14-0 up within 5 minutes after burning Miami deep for 46 and 54 yard TD passes very early.
I'm expecting Miami to be a lot more focussed this time, and these are the games they have to win since they consider themselves a genuine play-off team this year.
(Everyone knows about Vincent by now)

There's another trend that says...

League: 10-1 (Av. win 15.4) home 7+ fav on a Sunday off a Thursday game. [Miami]
8-0 (av. win 18.3!) if they were away.

Only seems to work for favs of 7 or more, but it seems that when a team gets a few extra days to plan/rest up for a game against a team they "should" beat, they make sure they do!
I guess the principle remains the same.
 

soul train

Go Mets!
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2005
8,807
20
0
I was thinking that the Browns might keep this
game close some how......

Bengals might be looking ahead to the Steelers

Good luck
 

MrChristo

The Zapper
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2001
4,414
5
0
Sexlexia...
NO @ GB under 38.5 (1.91)

Seeing a lot of people on the over here, but I just don't see it. Bad defense is one thing, but one totally inept, and one conservative, running offense shuld make points hard to come by.
A 52-3 point meeting last year, but Green Bay only had 309 total yards in that game.
2 INT returns for TD's, a 3 play, 19 yard TD from a fumble and another NO fumble on their 30 lead to a FG.
Some wild weather predicted (rain and 20+ mph winds) should see both teams running more than they throw...as I suspect they would have anyway.
NO will emphise a conservative, ball control offense all season...GB should this week more than any other!
Like getting this one above 38 anyway.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
i caught what i thought was an excellent 6 point teaser when the lines opened.....

da` bears-1.5/phins-1.............

i hate teasers,but i touched this one relatively substantially.....

culpepper had better get his groove on this week.....
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top