I dont care what anyone says, Denver was the right side here. 75% on Indy and the line doesnt move one bit. The house lost big on this game. Indy was a square play and the squares cashed.
in game colts broncs
- Thread starter pt1gard
- Start date
SQUARE PLAY?? LOL
IF YOU THINK THAT VEGAS GOT MORE TOTAL MONEY ON INDI THAN THEY DID ON DENVER YOU HAVE YOU ARE WRONG- I CAN ALMOST GUARANTEE YOU THAT VEGAS MADE OUT ON TOP IN THIS GAME BECAUSE THEY WERE GETTING HEAVY ACTION ON DENVER DESPITE WHAT THOSE CONSENSUS SIGHTS SAY
IF YOU THINK THAT VEGAS GOT MORE TOTAL MONEY ON INDI THAN THEY DID ON DENVER YOU HAVE YOU ARE WRONG- I CAN ALMOST GUARANTEE YOU THAT VEGAS MADE OUT ON TOP IN THIS GAME BECAUSE THEY WERE GETTING HEAVY ACTION ON DENVER DESPITE WHAT THOSE CONSENSUS SIGHTS SAY
That is a 100% accurate statement. Darent Williams better not be starting next week.
Last edited:
Manning was just picking them apart with short gains all day long, then he'd get to the red zone and hit Wayne. I guess destroying isn't the word, but he was definetly picking them apart.
there is no square side when youre talking about two of the best teams in the nfl. the game ended on a field goal, which shouldnt be a huge surprise.
Cant say I disagree with this, but everything I saw all week was baiting people to take Indy... By the line, ect.
- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,300
- 425
- 83
- 74
lets be objective with this. is indy a square team? of course. the same way the suns are in the nba, the same way hawaii and boise are in college. but there was nothing anti-public about denver, a 5-1 team coming in on an unprecedented defensive run and playing at home. plenty were on that. indy is plenty square, just not in a huge matchup like this. shake off the loss and get em next week man. plenty of good times to go anti-indy. just didnt see this week as oneof them
EXACTLY WHAT I AM SAYING...ALSO, WHAT ABOUT THAT STAT ABOUT UNDEFEATED TEAMS COMING INTO DENVER AND ALSO DENVER BEING UNDEFEATED LAST 13 AT HOME PLUS EVERYONE AND THEIR MOTHER KNOWS INDI CAN'T STOP THE RUN AND DENVER SPECIALIZES IN RUNNING THE BALL....ALL THAT ADD UPS
- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,300
- 425
- 83
- 74
square schmare,
most of you guys just look at percentages. they mean absolutely NOTHING. It only matters where the money goes. you can have 80% on the colts and 20 % on the broncos and still have more money on the broncos. for example 80 $100 bets and 20 $1000 bets means much more exposure for the "house" on the broncos. what you really need is percentage of money on each side and no book is going to publicly put that out there.
percentages mean squat. yeah, they are an indicator, but don't move a line. money does that and very few people know where it is, myself included for the most part.
gl
most of you guys just look at percentages. they mean absolutely NOTHING. It only matters where the money goes. you can have 80% on the colts and 20 % on the broncos and still have more money on the broncos. for example 80 $100 bets and 20 $1000 bets means much more exposure for the "house" on the broncos. what you really need is percentage of money on each side and no book is going to publicly put that out there.
percentages mean squat. yeah, they are an indicator, but don't move a line. money does that and very few people know where it is, myself included for the most part.
gl
I totally agree with you, and theres no possible way to figure out how much money is going on those teams only a % of the bets. However, since that is the best information available to us, analyzing it can't be all bad. Personally, I think using those % works better for the NCAA but it can help in the NFL too.
There is one way to tell but nobody ever follows thru on it and that is to ask your book at home. Start a thread every week and ask guys who have a good relationship with thier books to see where the money is. This is full proof but nobody does it.
On this game here to me Shanahan just got flat out out coached. At the end he runs all over Indy and then indy stacks the line with nine guys and he runs to palys right into the line. Did he not see Indy do this? And how about one. just freaking one blitz on Manning. You just don't keep rushing 4 guys all game long when it isn't working for shit. I have never like this coach with his braindead move to get Bubby Brister and now with Jake. I think Elway had a lot to do with this so called guy being called a genuis. He stunk today.
