No pure plays last week, but the two plays that were closest both covered.
No pure plays this week, butI think each one of these is pretty close to the system.
+11 Air Force avg 160 MORE rush yrds than ND and they only give up 6 more rushing yrds on d. Pretty close to a pure play if you ask me. ND is just so explosiive in the air and AF is a one dimensional team like Navy is.
+27 Kent St. avg more than 50 yrds more rushing yrds a game than VT, but VT run defense has much better #'s (102 >154)and has been top 5 rush defenses all year. With Wake on deck for next week I can see this being a game Kent St has a chance to cover. Just hold onto the ball!
+8.5 Marshall avg 60 more yrds rushing than ECU and they have better rush d #'s as well. If this line moves to double digits this is a definite play.
+19.5 Wyoming avg 135 to BYU 143 on rushing yrds, but they allow the same amount of rushing yrds against (108 ypg), WYO has far better pass D (allowing 60 yrds less a game than BYU)
GL this week to everyone, thoughts and opinions welcome
No pure plays this week, butI think each one of these is pretty close to the system.
+11 Air Force avg 160 MORE rush yrds than ND and they only give up 6 more rushing yrds on d. Pretty close to a pure play if you ask me. ND is just so explosiive in the air and AF is a one dimensional team like Navy is.
+27 Kent St. avg more than 50 yrds more rushing yrds a game than VT, but VT run defense has much better #'s (102 >154)and has been top 5 rush defenses all year. With Wake on deck for next week I can see this being a game Kent St has a chance to cover. Just hold onto the ball!
+8.5 Marshall avg 60 more yrds rushing than ECU and they have better rush d #'s as well. If this line moves to double digits this is a definite play.
+19.5 Wyoming avg 135 to BYU 143 on rushing yrds, but they allow the same amount of rushing yrds against (108 ypg), WYO has far better pass D (allowing 60 yrds less a game than BYU)
GL this week to everyone, thoughts and opinions welcome
Last edited:

