Halliburton, LOGCAP and gov't contracting

marine

poker brat
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
3,867
73
48
50
Fort Worth, TX
Thought I would post this up and get someone on the left spun up for fun.

Also of note, the top 100 list of Federal Contractors has been published. It lists (in terms of $$$ volume contracts won) the top 100 companies for the past year.

Surprisingly, KBR nor Haliburton were listed. With all the yimmer yammering I hear in the news about all these no bid contracts that KBR gets handed to them, they should be at least in the top 10.


http://www.washingtontechnology.com/top-100/2006/

Verizon was in the top 20 though.



HOUSTON ? KBR, the engineering, construction and services subsidiary of Halliburton (NYSE: HAL), addresses below inaccurate reporting regarding the Company?s activities in Iraq included in a soon-to-be-released documentary-style production from Brave New Films.

While we have not seen Brave New Films? privately-funded production regarding civilian contractors in Iraq in its entirety, we can deduce that its content regarding the Company is nothing more than a theory in search of a conspiracy.

Unfortunately, Brave New Films chose not to include detailed, factual information provided by the Company beginning in July 2006 as well as factual information regarding the Company?s work in Iraq which has been publicly available on the Company?s Web site beginning in 2003. Perhaps the production company chose not to include this information because the facts did not support their thesis for the film. Halliburton supports an organization like Brave New Films? right to free speech?even when they have the facts wrong.

The claims alleged against KBR in this film represent yet another recycled rehash of inaccurate information.

Unlike a fictitious place such as Xanadu, the reality of Iraq, regardless of any political opinion or agenda, requires support and dedication that KBR is proud to continue providing to U.S. and coalition forces.

Despite the adversity KBR and its parent company, Halliburton, have faced regarding its military support work, there is no match for the Company?s combination of hard work, commitment and outstanding employees.

KBR has helped the U.S. Military efforts in both Republican and Democratic administrations for more than 60 years and currently is operating in a war zone where decisions are made in minutes, not months, because of the ever changing conditions.

With various media continuing to research KBR?s support to troops in Iraq through the current Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) contract, KBR offers the following facts:

The LOGCAP III contract was awarded to KBR in December 2001, following an open, competitive bidding process. KBR currently has more than 50,000 employees and subcontractors in Iraq, Kuwait, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan and Djibouti who daily face danger and hostilities to ensure that our troops have the best food, shelter and quality of life possible.

Every potential employee on the LOGCAP III contract receives very specific warnings about the dangers of working in a war zone. Not one of our employees leaves the United States for Iraq without thorough and repeated briefings on the dangers in Iraq. In fact, during the training process, we spend most of our time giving recruits all the reasons they should NOT accept this job. In Iraq, however, we have a situation that is constantly changing. Both the military and our employees have to change with it.


While there has been coverage of an April 2004 convoy attack since its occurrence, KBR?s priority has always been the safety and security of its employees, regardless of where they work around the world. The U.S. military has command and control of all KBR convoys in Iraq, such as supplying pre-trip threat assessments and determining routes, and is required to provide security for KBR's employees through the company's contract with the Army. We cannot comment on matters related to pending litigation other than to say that Halliburton and KBR deny any allegations of wrongdoing and fully intend to vigorously defend our position.

KBR?s work is conducted under extraordinarily hostile conditions, yet our customer has continued to give us outstanding performance ratings for our work. To date under the LOGCAP III contract, KBR has been awarded 46 ratings of ?Excellent,? the highest score possible, and 12 ratings of ?Very Good,? the second highest score possible. This is great news for KBR and validates that our customer is pleased with the work the company is doing to meet the troops' often urgent needs, even while operating in a hostile war zone.

In financial terms, KBR?s margins on Iraq-related revenue have averaged quite low ? 2.2 percent of revenue ? since early 2003 through June 30, 2006.

By all accounts, KBR's logistical achievements in support of the troops in Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan have been nothing short of amazing. To date under the LOGCAP III contract, KBR has:

-- Prepared nearly 411 million meals

-- Washed more than 21.7 million bundles of laundry

-- Produced 5.85 billion gallons of water

-- Transported more than 648 million gallons of military fuel

-- Hosted more than 73.5 million patrons in MWR (Morale, Welfare and Recreation) facilities

-- Delivered nearly 205.7 million pounds of mail

-- Logged more than 100 million miles driven in support of the troops, with more than 650 trucks on the road on any given day

Following are links to public press releases and statements regarding KBR?s work in Iraq on the LOGCAP III contract, all of which are available on the Company?s Web site:
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
crimeney,man.........did you really say "halliburton"?... .:142smilie

marine...put your tin foil hat and/or your troll skin beanie on.....they`re gonna be on you like a hollywood celebrity at an anti-war rally....
this place is gonna be worse than a liberal arts college...

now i`m torn...hang out or read jimmy carter`s new book(Mr Peanut Goes To New York)...

incoming!!!!

.
 

marine

poker brat
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
3,867
73
48
50
Fort Worth, TX
yea, I really said Halliburton, KBR too. I searched and searched for some kind of listing for them in the top 100. I can't find them anywhere. Maybe there is a big conspiracy that the administration has orchestrated in order to take their names off the books to further punish the american public. I mean really, Lockheed Martin has been #1 for 12 straight years... this year pulling over $12 BILLION in contract awards. Why are the hippies not frothing at that mouth over them?
Verizon too... #14? surely there must be some sort of a conspiracy that public officials get free nighttime minutes starting at 5pm instead of 7pm and they toss all these magic no bid contracts to them.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Looks like the Neocons are waking up after the drubbing they took.

Not sure how they would rate a no bid, open ended, contract.
 
Last edited:

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,716
290
83
53
Belly of the Beast
Marine,

You may want to click the link that says "How we got our numbers" and then maybe you might realize that HAL doesn't really do Information Technology so they probably wouldn't belong on a list that includes that the top 100 Information Technology providers to the US Gov't and then maybe realize that your at a website called www.washington****ingtechnology.com :banghead:

Please edit your post before gw starts sending it out in email form . . . . and then Ctownguy will get it in about three years . . . . and then he'll repost it.
 
Last edited:

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
167
63
Bowling Green Ky
"Unfortunately, Brave New Films chose not to include detailed, factual information provided by the Company beginning in July 2006 as well as factual information regarding the Company?s work in Iraq which has been publicly available on the Company?s Web site beginning in 2003. Perhaps the production company chose not to include this information because the facts did not support their thesis for the film. Halliburton supports an organization like Brave New Films? right to free speech?even when they have the facts wrong."
++++++++++++++++++++++++

What??- omitting facts that don't support their thesis-who would have thought:142smilie
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Yes I believe you have to looked under no bid screw the Government in Iraq contracts. If Hal is not leader then there buds they just sold off KBR should be.
However on a make money bases Hal's stock may be a good buy right now.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Yes I believe you have to looked under no bid screw the Government in Iraq contracts. If Hal is not leader then there buds they just sold off KBR should be.
However on a make money bases Hal's stock may be a good buy right now.

Dj i wouldn't touch this stock with your money. Word has it these companies are starting to "cut and run"
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
Marine,

You may want to click the link that says "How we got our numbers" and then maybe you might realize that HAL doesn't really do Information Technology so they probably wouldn't belong on a list that includes that the top 100 Information Technology providers to the US Gov't and then maybe realize that your at a website called www.washington****ingtechnology.com :banghead:

Please edit your post before gw starts sending it out in email form . . . . and then Ctownguy will get it in about three years . . . . and then he'll repost it.

I'm sorry, but your facts have no business in this thread. It's too late - they're already rolling and are too stubborn to admit any errors or misinterpretation of data.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Marine, something tells me that you aren't having as much fun as you thought you would with the leftists here...lol.

Since you are on a mission to deliver the truth about government contracts, I thought I would look at that. I did find a list from 2005, which is fairly recent. Some interesting names on that list. I have not gone back to look, I am sure many are the same as they were back in the pre-Bush days, so will not make any assessments until I find some older numbers. But I think you may be surprised to look at the list and see who some of the largest 200 recipients are. I know I was. This should be an interesting exercise, glad you brought it up.

The list:
http://www.govexec.com/features/0806-15/0806-15s2s1.htm
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Hmm, lets examine a few of the companies.

Halliburton
2005 - $6.09 Billion, #6 overall.
2001 - $758 Million, #26 overall.

CH2M Hill Companies Ltd.
2005 - $1.2 Billion, #39 overall
2001 - $194 Million, #111 overall

Shaw Group
2005 - $588+ Million, #71 overall
2001 - Didn't make the list

Bechtel
2005 - $4.6 Billion
2001 - $2.1Million

Carlyle Group
2005 - $2.799 Billion
2001 - $1.37 Million

Interestingly, many other major contractors numbers stayed in the same ballpark, showing the contrast of these select contractors with Bush administration ties, for instance:

#1. Lockheed Martin
05 - $20 Billion
01 - $26 Billion

#2. Boeing
05 - $21 Billion
01 - $14.6 Billion

General Dynamics $11B/$4B; General Electric $2.6B/$1.9B, etc.

It would seem that most contractors without Bush administration direct ties stayed about the same, with rising costs figured in, numbers should rise. Don't see any at first glance that went from Millions to Billions, and many of the top dogs are defense contractors with big government contracts.

I don't think this really should surprise anyone. Bush administration companies - especially Halliburton - have benefitted directly by association to an amazing degree. Much more so than the non-Bush administration tied companies. I'm sure there are some that did, it would make sense. But this is a pretty striking story. Glad you brought it up, Marine.
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
LMAO

you leftists want to give money away for FREE but complain about it when money is paid for WORK????

What a bunch of loons!!!!

:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
LMAO

you leftists want to give money away for FREE but complain about it when money is paid for WORK????

What a bunch of loons!!!!

:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:

No, I am complaining about why the monetary expenditures from my tax dollars go specifically to a select few companies because of their connections to this administration. A disproportionate amount.

Maybe you could stick to the point, and not change the subject. Or not.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
What, no witty retorts? No Manson characters rolling around on the ground laughing, before being embarrassed soon after? No righties even care to try to spin this away from the sad truth?

Man, we GOTTA find a cricket smiley for our forum.
 

BetterUp

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 4, 2005
123
0
0
Poor righties how are they supposed to spin a good yarn when you guys keep coming in here with facts.

Keep up the good work.
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,716
290
83
53
Belly of the Beast
What, no witty retorts? No Manson characters rolling around on the ground laughing, before being embarrassed soon after? No righties even care to try to spin this away from the sad truth?

Man, we GOTTA find a cricket smiley for our forum.


You have to look at the positive side of things that we learned in the post. Along with Fox News, Wall Street Journal, Wikipedia, DTB also accepts Halliburton's PR department as a legitimate and unbiased newsource.

We report, you decide.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
167
63
Bowling Green Ky
I think Halibuton has right to claim ommisions of facts inliberal reporting--and you don't?

If not you still think Rove was indicted per your truthout liberal blog.

--and yes I consider WSJ-FOX-Wikipedia as some of most fair and balanced and would suggest your reading them will get you much further in life than your move.on- now defunct air america ect ect.

--it might get you into position to realize that higher taxes--and redistribution of wealth--social programs ect are not your road to improvement of life.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
--it might get you into position to realize that higher taxes--and redistribution of wealth--social programs ect are not your road to improvement of life.

Or it might help if some realized that the above examples are pretty blatant and we might not have to have such high taxes if so much money weren't "redistributed" by this administration to their own special interests and those that helped them achieve their position. It all adds up, doesn't it? Of course, selective indignation is probably a norm on both sides in the overall picture, but it doesn't make it right - and it certainly remains very wrong to do what these people have done - and continue to do.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top