Top Ten Junk Science 2006

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Thats Wayne at his finest.

Shifts gears from being busted in his own post with "junk authority" on junk science to chnging the topic to BBC's handicapping record.

You learned well from Bush/Cheney, Grasshopper.

Your source blamed the anti-asbetos movement for the collapse of the World Trade Center. Only in Waynes World. You really need more to do in Bowling Green.

Eddie
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Wayne:

On your "sheep" comment, isn't that the pot calling the kettle black. Bobby and gmroz22 busted you, not me. They came up with there own sources to show what a fraud you are.

It was your neighbor and fellow fly-over, red-stater, 65 that tried to support you with comments like "Oh Dogs...isn't it interesting that...ddt, hurricanes and ivory billed woodpeckers... are all bs" or some such garbage.

The bah's are coming from your flock.

You are low. You use a paid shill for supporting your posts, get busted by BBC, then attack his handicapping record. Who does that sound like.

You are a low-life, neanderthal, hill billy scum from a toothless, shoeless, hick town in the middle of absolutely no where. All you got is the memories of the good old days with Adolph Rupp (and Hitler too). You are a real puke.

You are also exposed for the dumb, fraud that you are.

Eddie

PS: Again, thanks for the bump IO
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,494
171
63
Bowling Green Ky
Edward You pathetic little dweeb--
You know--Theres something about a liberal that is a member of every get-a-life-anonymous org
known to mankind --critiqing me --that makes my day :)

might I suggest anger management as your next venture ;)
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,494
171
63
Bowling Green Ky
Well Edward I was going to let you slide--but since you persist--lets put the facts to your fraud allegations out in open like down in political forum a couple months back where you ran off and hid afterwards. You think they don't know you up here for some reason.

Would you please elaborate on the fraud--for your lemmings.

Should be very easy to do as all areas I contribute to -golf-stocks and foots are on going from start to current--

heres links to the threads--
golf-since 2000 to current
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=43

stocks-from 2003 to current
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=110602

foots-my yearly contribution
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=71586

What you don't see is high-lighting one good day/week/year and forget the rest--starting season till record goes south and abandoning till next year--they are all inclusive--from beginning to current

or is it military issue again --Would you like copy of my military personnel records--AGAIN


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Quite interesting that someone who goes to great lengths to hide their identity--contributes nothing--calling anyone a fraud?

As matter of fact if you paid attention to any of "the" fraudulant links--you could skip a few meetings--and could pay off a some of those Christmas credit card bills coming in ;)
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
lay down diversionary fire by inserting links to football, golf and stock threads. Good job Wayne. Elaborate on the fraud, you ask? Just read this thread, billy.

Fraud.

Eddie
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,154
1,430
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
U.N. climate panel says warming is man-made By Gerard Wynn and Alister Doyle
2 hours, 18 minutes ago

The world's top climate scientists said on Friday global warming was man-made, spurring calls for urgent government action to prevent severe and irreversible damage from rising temperatures.

The United Nations panel, which groups 2,500 scientists from more than 130 nations, predicted more droughts, heatwaves, rains and a slow gain in sea levels that could last for more than 1,000 years.

The scientists said it was "very likely" -- or more than 90 percent probable -- that human activities led by burning fossil fuels explained most of the warming in the past 50 years.

That is a toughening from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) last report in 2001, which judged a link as "likely," or 66 percent probable.

Possible signs range from drought in Australia to record high winter temperatures in Europe.

"February 2, 2007 may be remembered as the day the question mark was removed from whether (people) are to blame for climate change," said Achim Steiner, head of the U.N. Environment Program.

"Faced with this emergency, now is not the time for half measures. It is the time for a revolution, in the true sense of the term," French President Jacques Chirac said. "We are in truth on the historical doorstep of the irreversible."

The Kyoto Protocol is the main plan for capping emissions of greenhouse gases until 2012 but it has been severely weakened since the United States, the top source of greenhouse gases, pulled out in 2001. Emissions by many backers of Kyoto are far over target.

ARCTIC MELT

A 21-page summary of IPCC findings for policy makers outlines wrenching change such as a possible melting of Arctic sea ice in summers by 2100 and says it is "more likely than not" that greenhouse gases have made tropical cyclones more intense.

The report predicts a "best estimate" that temperatures would rise by between 1.8 and 4.0 Celsius (3.2 and 7.8 Fahrenheit) in the 21st century, within a likely range from 1.1 to 6.4 Celsius.

Temperatures rose 0.7 degrees in the 20th century and the 10 hottest years since records began in the 1850s have been since 1994. Greenhouse gases are released mainly by burning fossil fuels in power plants, factories and cars.

Many backers of Kyoto, binding 35 industrial nations to cut greenhouse gas emissions to 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2008-12, want outsiders led by the United States and big developing nations such as China and India to get involved.

The head of the U.S. delegation defended Bush's policies that brake the rise of emissions rather than cap them. Democrats who control both houses of Congress want tougher action.

"The President has put in place a comprehensive set of policies to address what he has called the 'serious challenge' of climate change," said Sharon Hays, Associate Director of the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy.

Bush pulled out of Kyoto, saying caps would harm the economy and that Kyoto should include developing nations. He focuses instead on big investments in hydrogen and biofuels.

The President of Kiribati, a group of 33 Pacific coral atolls threatened by rising seas, said time was running out.

"The question is, what can we do now? There's very little we can do about arresting the process," President Anote Tong said.

The report projects a rise in sea levels of between 18 and 59 centimeters (7 and 23 inches) in the 21st century -- and said bigger gains could not be ruled out if ice sheets in Antarctica and Greenland thaw.

Some leading scientists had criticized a draft for cutting the range from a 2001 forecast of a rise between 9 and 88 cm. Rising seas threaten low-lying islands, coasts of countries such as Bangladesh and cities from Shanghai to Buenos Aires.

DTB: I'm confident you won't read this article beyond the first sentence, but I'd really like tohear your thoughts on this article.

I await your response with feverish anticipation.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,494
171
63
Bowling Green Ky
I read that at drudge this morning--

I can agree there is global warming--but there has also been same in different cycles throughout history (the last in 1930's)--My question is --considering the other warming cycles were referred to just that warming cycles--what makes this one any different--have seen no proof from anyone to contrary--

--with that being said I think we should do everything possible to stop any pollution--whether it causes global warming are not--my main issue is with the premise of proven fact when there is none --yet-- that I have seen. IMO you have 2 sides both with an agenda--and I believe the truth to be somewhere in the middle.

Have seen all the hoopla on australia lately--however both sides admit that Australia's mean temperature has been showing a general warming trend over the past 100 years--so why the--sky is falling--attitude today:shrug:
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Eddie , Dog i think this ranks up there in my top five favorite threads @ Mad Jacks.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top