US 'Iran attack plans' revealed

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
i'm not surprised that there are such plans....but it doesn't mean that anything will happen in the near future...




US contingency plans for air strikes on Iran extend beyond nuclear sites and include most of the country's military infrastructure, the BBC has learned.

It is understood that any such attack - if ordered - would target Iranian air bases, naval bases, missile facilities and command-and-control centres.

The US insists it is not planning to attack, and is trying to persuade Tehran to stop uranium enrichment.

The UN has urged Iran to stop the programme or face economic sanctions.

But diplomatic sources have told the BBC that as a fallback plan, senior officials at Central Command in Florida have already selected their target sets inside Iran.

That list includes Iran's uranium enrichment plant at Natanz. Facilities at Isfahan, Arak and Bushehr are also on the target list, the sources say.

Two triggers

BBC security correspondent Frank Gardner says the trigger for such an attack reportedly includes any confirmation that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon - which it denies.

Alternatively, our correspondent adds, a high-casualty attack on US forces in neighbouring Iraq could also trigger a bombing campaign if it were traced directly back to Tehran.
Long range B2 stealth bombers would drop so-called "bunker-busting" bombs in an effort to penetrate the Natanz site, which is buried some 25m (27 yards) underground.

The BBC's Tehran correspondent Frances Harrison says the news that there are now two possible triggers for an attack is a concern to Iranians.

Authorities insist there is no cause for alarm but ordinary people are now becoming a little worried, she says.

Deadline

Earlier this month US officers in Iraq said they had evidence Iran was providing weapons to Iraqi Shia militias. However the most senior US military officer later cast doubt on this, saying that they only had proof that weapons "made in Iran" were being used in Iraq.


Gen Peter Pace, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said he did not know that the Iranian government "clearly knows or is complicit" in this.

At the time, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said the accusations were "excuses to prolong the stay" of US forces in Iraq.

Middle East analysts have recently voiced their fears of catastrophic consequences for any such US attack on Iran.

Britain's previous ambassador to Tehran, Sir Richard Dalton, told the BBC it would backfire badly by probably encouraging the Iranian government to develop a nuclear weapon in the long term.

Last year Iran resumed uranium enrichment - a process that can make fuel for power stations or, if greatly enriched, material for a nuclear bomb.

Tehran insists its programme is for civil use only, but Western countries suspect Iran is trying to build nuclear weapons.

The UN Security Council has called on Iran to suspend its enrichment of uranium by 21 February.

If it does not, and if the International Atomic Energy Agency confirms this, the resolution says that further economic sanctions will be considered.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Read today where the Iran oil production capabilities are nearing extremely low levels, could cause severe shortages. I'm wondering if this could trigger something more aggressive on their part - or something more "giving" in the area of foreign policy. Oil shortages can certainly cause unrest in the public, and governments to look for some dramatic solutions.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
I can't believe anyone told the BBC Anything. Unless this is another Cheney brain fart idea. On the other hand any one of us could say about same thing. Or take a guess like BBC. As for Iran's oil. The world can over come it for some time. But you will pay over 3 bucks again. Big problem is how much other then Iran's gets stopped from getting out of the area. Then you will pay over 5 bucks and wait in line. So wild bunch we have in W H better be right this time.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,914
140
63
17
L.A.
if we pre-emptively attack iran, we are fukked. stupidest thing we could possibly do.
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,538
1,591
113
51
Earth
www.ffrf.org
if we pre-emptively attack iran, we are fukked. stupidest thing we could possibly do.

ACTUALLY,we have already done the STUPIDEST thing we could possibly do: We invaded a foreign country under false pretenses and declared war on something intangible......Very hard to top that.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Iran is absolutely no threat to us and this is another neocon crock of crap to divert and instill fear. 2/3 of their people don't even like their gov't and they know this. How quickly we once again fall for a bunch of Neocon bullcrap.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Cheney, who has been wrong about everything he ever said about Iraq, has the balls to be attacking other people for what they say. This should prove that these neocons have no soul and cannot be trusted.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Cheney, who has been wrong about everything he ever said about Iraq, has the balls to be attacking other people for what they say. This should prove that these neocons have no soul and cannot be trusted.

Stevie, Cheney is the most rotten poor excuse for a human bein I have ever come across in my lifetime. To think his wife had the gaul to call Kerry a very bad man is laughable. They say only the good die young but pricks live forever. why isn't this rotten bastard being tried for treason in the Joe Wilson case. You know this scum was the one behind outing Wilson's wife. Its been his MO with anyone who disagrees with him and why would he hire a guy with such a bad memory? This is our country and his top guy has a very bad memory. Oh lawd even the neo cons could have come up with a better defense than this.
.
 
Last edited:

Pujo21

Registered
Forum Member
May 14, 2002
2,772
2
0
i think if The USA attacks IRAN then there is a real potential that IRAN will try to obliterate Israel.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top