I know it's just a prestige thing, but how in the world did Ohio State NOT get #1 overall seed?
On top of it, how the heck did they end up 3rd!:scared
Let's see, Ohio State:
#1 in coaches poll
#1 in AP poll
#1 in RPI
Won the Big 10 regular season
Won the Big 10 tournament
In winning the Big 10 tourney, they beat the #4 RPI team, and #3 ranked team, not some bunny.
Who did FL beat in the tourney? #35 or so Arkansas. Who did NC beat in the tourney? #83 North Carolina State.
What does the NCAA even have polls, or better yet, even ever reference the RPI? Obviously it has no meaning to the committee at all.
I seriously doubt the committee does any analysis at all. They probably sit around the table with pizza and beer and ask each other as they get drunk "Who do you like?". The computers we see on the table are the ones you see at open houses when buying a house - in other words, they are made out of cardboard and are there for looks only.
What is so hypocritical is in football EVERYTHING revolves around the BCS and the ranking. Then when basketball comes, they claim they use the RPI (which admittedly isn't perfect, but either is the BCS) which is the only real tool to compare schedules and results and they totally disregard it.
Not that I am a Ohio State fan at all, but of any team's seeding in the tourney, they certainly gotted screwed the hardest. #1 in every conceivable ranking, but end up ranked as the 3rd ranked team for the tournament.
And the head of the committee is from Princeton? And I thought Ivy League guys were smart... :mj07:
On top of it, how the heck did they end up 3rd!:scared
Let's see, Ohio State:
#1 in coaches poll
#1 in AP poll
#1 in RPI
Won the Big 10 regular season
Won the Big 10 tournament
In winning the Big 10 tourney, they beat the #4 RPI team, and #3 ranked team, not some bunny.
Who did FL beat in the tourney? #35 or so Arkansas. Who did NC beat in the tourney? #83 North Carolina State.
What does the NCAA even have polls, or better yet, even ever reference the RPI? Obviously it has no meaning to the committee at all.
I seriously doubt the committee does any analysis at all. They probably sit around the table with pizza and beer and ask each other as they get drunk "Who do you like?". The computers we see on the table are the ones you see at open houses when buying a house - in other words, they are made out of cardboard and are there for looks only.
What is so hypocritical is in football EVERYTHING revolves around the BCS and the ranking. Then when basketball comes, they claim they use the RPI (which admittedly isn't perfect, but either is the BCS) which is the only real tool to compare schedules and results and they totally disregard it.
Not that I am a Ohio State fan at all, but of any team's seeding in the tourney, they certainly gotted screwed the hardest. #1 in every conceivable ranking, but end up ranked as the 3rd ranked team for the tournament.
And the head of the committee is from Princeton? And I thought Ivy League guys were smart... :mj07: