wash. going after briggs ?

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
Redskins may put together offer for Bears' Briggs

By Len Pasquarelli
ESPN.com


PHOENIX -- While a proposal has yet to be formalized, the Washington Redskins will make a trade offer to the Chicago Bears aimed at acquiring two-time Pro Bowl weakside linebacker Lance Briggs, agent Drew Rosenhaus and two league sources told ESPN.com late Monday night.

Washington will propose a swap of first-round draft picks in this year's draft -- the Redskins own the sixth overall selection and Chicago has the 31st choice -- in exchange for Briggs. The potential deal, which is expected to pick up steam on Tuesday morning as the annual NFL meetings continue, would be contingent on the Redskins signing Briggs to a long-term contract.

Having failed last spring to consummate a long-term contract with Briggs -- reportedly a seven-year, $33 million deal on which both sides worked for several weeks before the negotiations collapsed-- the Bears invoked the franchise tag last month to keep the four-year veteran off the open market.

Briggs, 26, told ESPN.com three weeks ago that he preferred to be traded or have Chicago rescind the franchise tag and make him a free agent rather than return to the Bears. On Monday, Rosenhaus told the Chicago Sun-Times if his client is not dealt and remains under the team's franchise tag, Briggs would sit out the first 10 games, then return for the final six to accrue a played season under league rules.

On Monday afternoon, Briggs arrived at the resort hotel where NFL owners are meeting and met briefly with Bears general manager Jerry Angelo.

"It was good in the sense that we talked man-to-man," Briggs said. "But not much changed [during the meeting]. But it was good, a positive step, in that we both know where each other stands in this thing."

Subsequent to that meeting, Briggs spoke with representatives with a few teams, including the Redskins. The standout linebacker spoke with Washington owner Dan Snyder, coach Joe Gibbs and general manager Vinny Cerrato. At some point in the evening, the Washington brass determined to make a play for Briggs, and there were discussions with Rosenhaus about potential contract parameters.

Rosenhaus, who has struck several deals with Snyder, said later Monday that reaching a contract agreement with the Redskins was "a strong likelihood." But he also acknowledged that Washington still had to formalize a trade proposal and the Bears had to accept.

"But it's a win-win situation," Rosenhaus said. "Chicago only wants to sign Lance to a one-year contract anyway. If they made the trade, they would move up 25 spots in the first round and be able to choose one of the premier players in the draft. And Lance, obviously, would get the long-term deal he wants [from the Redskins]. It's a good resolution for everyone."

By using the franchise marker on Briggs, the Bears ostensibly made him a one-year qualifying offer worth $7.206 million. Briggs has the right to negotiate with any team and to sign an offer sheet. If the Bears decline to match the offer sheet, the team which signed Briggs would have to send Chicago a pair of first-round draft choices as compensation. But such compensation is considered prohibitive, and pretty much precludes an offer sheet.

The kind of trade the Redskins will propose makes more sense for all of the parties involved. There have been rumors for much of the offseason that the Redskins wanted to trade out of the No. 6 slot in the first round. And a deal for Briggs, one of the NFL's top young linebackers, would represent the kind of big splash Snyder likes to make. It would also allow Chicago to get value for Briggs and to rid itself of an unhappy player.

A former University of Arizona standout, Briggs was chosen by the Bears in the third round of the 2003 draft. He earned a starting job as a rookie, emerged by his third season as one of the NFL's top young weakside linebackers, and was chosen for the Pro Bowl in each of the past two seasons.

Even playing in the lengthy shadow of middle linebacker Brian Urlacher, with whom he has become close friends, Briggs is regarded leaguewide as a top defender and playmaker.

Len Pasquarelli is a senior NFL writer for ESPN.com
 

IntenseOperator

DeweyOxburger
Forum Member
Sep 16, 2003
17,897
63
0
Chicago
highly doubt it's ever going to happen

I'm thinking Briggs gives in. His agent has another Bear (Harris I think) on his client list and whatever other players he gets down the road. I think Angelo is gonna draw a line in the sand and stick to it. Briggs and his agent can chirp to the public and create whatever trade they like. At the end of the day, IMO it would be a monster mistake by the organization to give in to this players demands and all the orchestration of his agent Drew.
 

Chill

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 12, 2005
668
4
0
I think they would be better off without him if he doesnt want to be there. Its also a hell of a cap hit to pay him. They probably arent gonna sign him into next season anyway. i would trade him and take the high draft pick. They could land Quinn or Landry with a selection that high. Safety and QB should be a priority for them.
 

IE

Administrator
Forum Admin
Forum Member
Mar 15, 1999
95,440
223
63
Acquiring Briggs makes no sense

THE WASHINGTON TIMES

So much for the Washington Redskins showing offseason restraint and valuing their draft picks.
Several online media outlets reported Monday night that the Redskins in general and owner Dan Snyder in particular have reached out to the Chicago Bears, offering the No. 6 overall pick in next month's draft in exchange for disgrunted linebackers Lance Briggs and the No. 31 overall pick.
Briggs' agent Drew Rosenhaus and Redskins owner Dan Snyder confirmed the offer to Fox Sports on Monday.
This move would make zero sense on several levels.
1. It would cost too much money.
Briggs is scheduled to make $7.2 million in 2007 after the Bears placed the franchise tag on him, taking him off the financial bonanza that was this year's free agent market. The Redskins being the Redskins, if they traded for Briggs (who ended Patrick Ramsey's tenure as the Redskins starter with a clothesline-like hit in the 2005 opener), they would undoubtedly hand him a long-term, big-money contract instead of letting him play out 2007 with his current salary. The Redskins have been restrained only because they have had little money to spend/waste.
2. Do the Redskins really need help at linebacker?
London Fletcher got big money to start in the middle, Marcus Washington is getting big money to continue starting at strong-side linebacker and second-year player Rocky McIntosh (remember, whom the Redskins gave up an '07 second-round pick and a sixth-round pick last year to acquire) is expected to get the first shot at weak-side linebacker. Plus, there's Lemar Marshall. Trading for Briggs would make drafting McIntosh a waste and serve as a slap in the face to a scouting department who convinced the coaches that McIntosh was worth trading up for last year.
3. It's not a guarantee Briggs will thrive in the Redskins' scheme.
The Bears play a Cover 2 and we all know how Archuleta's transition from St. Louis' Cover 2 philosophy to the Redskins' system went. Briggs has been raising hell this offseason, ripping the Bears every chance he can get, vowing to sit out the season if the Bears don't move him or give him a long-term contract. If the Redskins acquire him and give him his money, where's the incentive for Briggs to perform? The Bears and Briggs cut off negotiations last season after discussing a 7-year, $33 million deal.
4. It would disable the Redskins' efforts to bolster their depth chart.
The No. 6 pick would go to the Bears. There isn't exactly a hot market for the second-to-last pick of the first round. If the Redskins trade out of the first round, they wouldn't get very much in return. The sixth pick has a chance to be extremely valuable, especially if Miami and/or Minnesota become enamored with Brady Quinn and want to trade up a couple spots to draft him.
 

IntenseOperator

DeweyOxburger
Forum Member
Sep 16, 2003
17,897
63
0
Chicago
IE

as far as the Bears are concerned, if they made the move they would have to pay for the 1st round pick which would probably be more. They would be paying a ton for an unknown commodity instead of being in a position of strength and paying Briggs in a more controlled setting. Briggs can be placed in the same situation next year as well. The Bears told him he was going to be franchised if he dismissed last years offer. He then brought the super agent in and planned on this confrontation. I also heard that Drew Rosie is currently the agent for 5 other Bears players as well. Local radio has stated that Washington has been shopping this pick for some time and they can't throw much more in to the deal because they have burned much of their draft options.
 

bert07

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 22, 2005
2,379
10
0
46
Maryland
surprise surprise we want to give up another first round draft pick
although this guy seems young and good
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
54
So. Cal
my honest opinion as a bears fan

fuk off rosenhaus, you are an agent not a gm and floating trades actually ruins your clients value.

the bears are super bowl ready now and trading briggs and a #1 pick for the #6 pick wouldn't be wise unless they were able to get calvin johnson (not happening unless they are able to trade up from 6 to 2 or 3) OR trade down from 6 and get Olson the TE from Miami and addtl picks. Sounds great but even by doing that you get multiple ? marks and almost the same payout as Briggs and 2 more rookies and a hole at outside linebacker. Now, if they had signed Cato June (cover 2 linebacker to compliment Urlacher) then this would be an option but getting rid of Briggs leaves a hole on the defense for a team that is super bowl ready.

My gut tells me that Briggs eventually gets offered another contract by the bears and signs it or agrees to show up to camp on time with the bears agreeing to not franchise tag him next year and they sit pat with the 31 and 37 picks and gets his replacement drafted this year.
 

escarzamd

...abides.
Forum Member
Dec 26, 2003
1,266
1
0
57
5ft, pin high......
I'd send him to 'Skins.

#1) He doesn't want to play for the Bear? He feels disrepected? He wants Top 5 LB $$$? (Urlacher is #8) Fine. Enjoy your crazy new owner and playbook and make other plans for the Pro-Bowl in '08.

#2) Looks like a stellar defensive draft at the top......Branch or Okoye next to Harris for the next 3-4 yrs in the Tampa 2? Thats the blueprint.
Adams to add to excellent DE depth.....Dah quottabahk musgo down hahd. Landry or Nelson to replace Brown?? SS is more important to the Tampa 2 than the Sam LB if the last 2 playoff losses have shown us anything.

#3) I have faith that any good LB will look great next to #54. Briggs is awfully good, but he doesn't hold Derrick Brooks jock at the same stage in his career. If we can hide Hillenmeyer next to him for 2 yrs and still coast thru the division, something tells me we can find another one in the 2nd or 3rd rd again.

I'd hold out for a player from the 'Skins in addition to the 1st rd switch. They have to have an extra LB if they take on Briggs.

...........and Drew RosenKnuckle can lick me........

Question: If you saw Drew strolling across the street in front of you, yammering away on his BlackBerry, would you step on the pedal on the left? OR the vertical one on the right??
 

Dayad

Sic 'em
Forum Member
Dec 14, 2005
978
0
0
NM
I don't see this happening the way it is currently offered. UNLESS the Bears have a trading partner to move down with multiple picks and giving up the #6. Just my thoughts
 

IntenseOperator

DeweyOxburger
Forum Member
Sep 16, 2003
17,897
63
0
Chicago
Off local radio...

Some big names from the Bear's defense will not be attending this years Bears convention. It is thought this is some show of support for Briggs.
 

Dice34

Off parole
Forum Member
Dec 18, 2004
4,731
27
0
D.O.C.
Bears counter-offered and it was rumored to be one of the 3 following redskins(LB- ROcky mcIntosh, LB-Lemar Marshall or DT_Kedric Golston) along with their 6th for Briggs and 31st.......

Redskins came back according to the tool on NFL network.......and their final offer is 6th pick for Briggs and 31st pick, no other players involved

Also rumored, according to Paulino from Scouts that the Bills and Giants have come into play
 

Big Daddy

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2000
4,382
13
38
69
Wisconsin
No busy signals on Briggs front
Bears GM Angelo disputes Internet rumors, knows of no new interest in LB


April 25, 2007


Jerry Angelo might have been bluffing, an act as involuntary as sneezing for NFL general managers this time of year.

But what would Angelo gain by publicly acknowledging little or no league interest in trading for linebacker Lance Briggs, other than a pat on the back for standing his ground?


"I haven't had anybody call me personally about Lance [Briggs] other than Washington," Angelo said Tuesday at Halas Hall in a predraft conversation with Chicago media.

He was responding to Internet rumors that have popped up in at least five NFL cities regarding their teams' supposed interest in Briggs. The latest was Tampa Bay, which the Bucs' front office shot down Tuesday as the team simply doing its "due diligence" on franchise players who eventually could hit the free-agent market.

In truth, Angelo says he hasn't discussed a deal for Briggs with any GM and didn't sound like someone expecting to hear an offer he couldn't refuse in the final days before the draft when the trade market fluctuates.

"I don't know, I really don't," Angelo said. "Could it happen? It could happen, but I can't sit here and put a percentage on that. I am not in control of that."

In one of the many interviews Briggs has conducted since protesting the Bears' decision to designate him a franchise player and guarantee him $7.2 million, he once talked about wanting to be the focal point for another team the way Brian Urlacher is for the Bears. But if only one team calling Angelo directly in the past month about making a deal for the Pro Bowl linebacker is an indication, Briggs has a long way to go before entering Urlacher's NFL neighborhood.

If Urlacher put himself on the trade block, Angelo would need to add an office phone line and buy a BlackBerry to monitor trade interest. Briggs shopping himself around the league barely disturbed Angelo during the past three weeks of internal draft meetings.

The less Angelo's phone has rung, the louder the message. Maybe Briggs and agent Drew Rosenhaus overestimated how much teams are willing to give up for a player who wants $20 million guaranteed and has acted over the past two months like a potential locker-room lawyer.

It has been nearly four weeks since the Redskins offered what amounted to the 16th overall pick of the NFL draft for Briggs. It has been even longer since Rosenhaus did everything but take bids on eBay for Briggs at the NFL owners meetings in Phoenix that Angelo decried again Tuesday as "a circus."

Every day since then that Briggs remains a Bear, Angelo gets a little more leverage.

"I was very turned off by that," Angelo said of the Rosenhaus stunt of parading Briggs from team to team. "We are a business, we are a profession and there are certain ways you do business."

Rosenhaus continued to operate by his own rules Tuesday in an interview with Dan Patrick on WMVP-AM 1000. Asked about the trade prospects for Briggs, Rosenhaus contradicted what Angelo had said just an hour earlier.

"All you have to do is look on the Internet and see the teams interested," Rosenhaus said.

He predicted a deal would get done on draft day because, in what sounded like transparent patter, Angelo is too intelligent not to get something in return for a player who could walk away for nothing after next season.

"They're good, the Bears are very smart," Rosenhaus said. "I have to believe [Angelo] can manipulate this interest [into a trade]."

Angelo surely could?if legitimate interest existed.

Rosenhaus also, in what only served to deepen the image of Briggs as a greedy poster child for selfish professional athletes, implied to Patrick that Briggs would play for a perennial loser as long as it paid him.

"We don't have a preference other than get a long-term deal," Rosenhaus said.

It would serve Briggs right if the Oakland Raiders agreed to a long-term deal and the Bears shipped him there, into NFL oblivion, for their second- and two third-round draft picks. But that would be a petty overreaction and the Bears have taken the high road no matter how hard Rosenhaus keeps trying to veer the dispute off-road into the muck.

Coach Lovie Smith, for example, restated his belief that Briggs will start the opener against San Diego and said he didn't take anything said or done so far personally.

"Once [Briggs] has to be here, he'll be a part of it," Smith insisted.

Likewise, Angelo tried putting a happy face on the potential distraction of the '07 season by complimenting Urlacher for defending his teammate against the Bears in a national radio interview last week.

"I'm understanding of that," Angelo said. "Players are loyal to one another. I respect that. You can't make decisions based on emotion."

No matter what Angelo's heart says, his head keeps telling him if he lets Briggs bully him into a bad trade or a new contract, he won't be the last pouty player to speak up in the locker room.

"Yes, that's very important to us that that message comes through loud and clear," Angelo said.

With the draft just three days away, the Bears just need to stay on message.

That is, draft four players who could contribute immediately. Think offense, ideally wide receiver, running back, offensive line and tight end. Don't give Briggs away out of fear he will hold out and don't over-reach for his potential replacement. Under no circumstances take Briggs' contract dispute into the draft room this weekend.

Don't do anything at all regarding Briggs this week except answer the phone from a potential trade partner. Assuming one ever calls.

dhaugh@tribune.com
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
54
So. Cal
the bears are NOT trading briggs and the 31st pick to the redskins for lance briggs

now, if the 4th pick is available from the bucs AND calvin johnson is there, dont be surprised if that trade happens.....although i doubt it will.

the bears will either make a trade with the giants at #20 to get olsen from miami,
or
keep briggs and trade down from #31 and pick up an early second and another pick (most likely scenario)
 

IntenseOperator

DeweyOxburger
Forum Member
Sep 16, 2003
17,897
63
0
Chicago
Local writer with radio show that does the Bears beat (Mike Mulligan) said he pretty sure a deal will be done with Washington. The only thing undecided is whether the pick will be from this year or next years draft. If nothing is done by the time the draft starts, Briggs will most likely be staying. Because all the calling back and forth between the teams and then clearing it with Briggs is all too much to get done in a 15 minute window.

Never knew Minnesota recently missed making their pick in the alloted time and got dropped a pick.:mj07:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top