ortiz...

IE

Administrator
Forum Admin
Forum Member
Mar 15, 1999
95,440
223
63
from twins writer after ortiz's last start....


Within Ortiz's 3-0 record and sparkling 2.05 ERA are signs that his improvement is far from sustainable. For instance, Ortiz has managed to strand 87.2 percent of the runners he's allowed to reach base through three starts, which is simply not going to last. To put that in some context, consider that Johan Santana left about 78 percent of his runners on base over the past three years, while Ortiz stranded about 72 percent.

Similarly, Ortiz has seen 80 percent of the balls put in play against him converted into outs thus far. The Twins' defense is good, but no defense is that good. Over the past three seasons, the Twins turned 70 percent of balls in play into outs and Ortiz himself also had about 70 percent of his balls in play find gloves over that span. If a team is able to convert 72 percent of balls in play into outs during a given year, it's typically good enough to lead all of baseball. Eighty percent is not even close to sustainable.

None of that takes away from what Ortiz has already done, of course. In fact, for as much as I hated the decision to sign Ortiz, what he's done through three starts goes a long way toward making it a successful move regardless of what happens from here on out. With that said, all the talk of Anderson working a miracle and Ortiz turning into a new pitcher is extremely premature, because the underlying numbers within his performance suggest that he's been extraordinarily, unsustainably lucky.




KC TOTAL RUNS
o4?-120

could be be a worthy gamble today...
 

Destructor D

Destructor
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2005
8,632
133
63
Kansas City, MO
My concern would be the Royals anemic bats. KC is averaging less than 4 runs per game and hitting just .238 as a team. They have 2 starters batting over .255.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top