ron paul holdind steady.....at 0 percent

[The Judge]

first off,spongy,he`s a tin foil hat wearing moron......anybody that wants to run for president of the u.s.a. and actually believes that the government was involved in 9/11,loses all credibility.....

If you truly believe this then you are more brainwashed than I previously had even imagined and that is saying a lot.


?If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.? - Joseph Goebbels

A Fox, a Wolf and a whole lot of BULL (Part One)

A Fox, a Wolf and a whole lot of BULL (Part Two)

 

[gardenweasel]

Harry Caray

excellent,i.o....

thanks,bjf.....i do it for my peeps..i hate disappointing my public.....:thumb:

"how many polls could ron paul win, if ron paul could win polls?"

(say 5x fast).....

one more....ron pol pot-head..........:142smilie

dweezil and moonunit zappa?......

:mj10: ....o.k.,i`m gettin` carried away....

 

[gardenweasel]

If you truly believe this then you are more brainwashed than I previously had even imagined and that is saying a lot.


“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” - Joseph Goebbels

A Fox, a Wolf and a whole lot of BULL (Part One)

A Fox, a Wolf and a whole lot of BULL (Part Two)

quoting goebbels?........

lets have one piece of REAL proof....not rabbit-hutch/chicken wire simulations.....

one conspirator come forward.....there had to have been hundreds...at a minimum....

anybody else remember lucy van pelt once recommended to charlie brown that they name their baseball team "the goose eggs" (for obvious reasons)....

maybe ron paul should take a tip from the funny pages (a place that he is, apparently, familiar with)........

 

[gardenweasel]

here`s a laugh.....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/07/10/nmusic110.xml


murder trial?....somebody`s life`s on the line?......

la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la.....


guys...."i`m so glad we had this time together...

just to have a laugh and sing a song"...


"seems we just get started,then before you know it.......

comes the time we have to say so long".....:sadwave:

.....

 

[The Judge]

lets have one piece of REAL proof....not rabbit-hutch/chicken wire simulations.....

one conspirator come forward.....there had to have been hundreds...at a minimum....

Rewatch the debate, Weasel. Paul never said anything even remotely close to "The US Government was behind the 9/11 attacks." You have been brainwashed by your favorite network and the links that I posted demonstrate that all too clearly.

 

[gardenweasel]

then why is he encouraging the inmates?....




http://michellemalkin.com/2007/05/19/trutheriness-and-ron-paul/



just say,"it`s been investigated,and theres no prrof of any gov`t conspiracy".......end...finis...kaput......

 

[buddy]

tried posting a pic of lucy van pelt but it dint work

shucks

:rant2:

 

[AR182]

"i`m so glad we had this time together...

just to have a laugh and sing a song"...


"seems we just get started,then before you know it.......

comes the time we have to say so long".....:sadwave:

.....

gw...never figured you for a carol burnett fan...loved that show.

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

speaking of gallup polls--

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070710/pl_nm/usa_congress_politics_dc;_ylt=Audws4YgEiNhcAD1VyJnHGFZ.3QA

By Steve Holland
Tue Jul 10, 10:03 AM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - These are tough times for the Democratic-led U.S. Congress, where partisan battles have led to little progress on big issues and have made lawmakers collectively less popular than President George W. Bush.

Congress, typically never all that popular to begin with, starts the second half of 2007 with an anemic job approval rating of about 25 percent, down from 43 percent in January, with one Gallup poll ranking lawmakers at 14 percent.

 

[smurphy]

I like the threads where Gardenweasel makes four separate posts without interruption ....and still finds time to quote himself later!:0corn

 

[The Judge]

http://michellemalkin.com/2007/05/19/trutheriness-and-ron-paul/

There is nothing in that blog entry that makes any claim that Paul stated that the US was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. However, that goofy bitch Michelle Malkin makes a complete fool of herself in on of the video links that I posted earlier with idiotic claims that you just have to see to believe. Weasel, please tell me that her blog is not the source of your delirium.

On second thought, that makes perfect sense.



About Michelle Malkin:

I?m a mother, wife, blogger, conservative syndicated columnist, author, and Fox News Channel contributor. My other blog is a group videoblog, Hot Air.

Random fun facts:

My current ringtone (at my kids? request): ?Breaking Free? from High School Musical.

My Normblog profile number: 137

Favorite charity: Soldiers? Angels

Shoe size: 6 ?.

First car: 1993 Toyota Tercel, white, stick shift, no air conditioning.

Secret: I?m really a member of the Left. Left-handed club, that is.

Here?s my YouTube page.

Here?s my Technorati Faves page.

Despite my online presence, I was born and remain an ink-stained wretch. I started my newspaper journalism career at the Los Angeles Daily News in 1992, moved to the Seattle Times in 1995, and have been penning nationally syndicated newspaper columns for Creators Syndicate since 1999.

I?ve written three books:

Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores (Regnery 2002)

In Defense of Internment: The Case for ?Racial Profiling? in World War II and the War on Terror (Regnery 2004)

Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild (Regnery 2005)

I?m a Philly-born, South Jersey-raised alumna of Holy Spirit HS and Oberlin College. I live with my husband and two children near Washington DC. Reach me via e-mail at writemalkin -at- gmail -dot- com.



In reality, this woman is one of the most hateful spinners of Dubya's doctrine alive today. To watch her on camera, you would swear that she excretes toxins from her pores everytime she mentions the word "liberal."

Nice "source" Weasy but she doesn't come close to passing the smell test.

 

[smurphy]

Yeah, Malkin is another one of those snide female conservative icons. No open discussion or sharing of facts from all sides, just a series of jabs at anything other than her core politics. She's very worthy of filling in for O'Reilly whenever he's not up for manning his post on Fox.

 

[djv]

That congress were mad at. I for one am. And at all reb/dem alike. As I believe most intelligent folks are. And even mad as heck at Bush for vetoing every ones work. And Bush pushing for a useless immigration bill.
As for Ron Paul it's the American way anyone can run.

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Michelle Malkin:
Certainly no Pelosi

If you think she's a dummy you should see her in the many one on one debates with Dem stratagist.

They are having hard time now finding any that will go on with her.

The only thing I have seen her fail to do is get direct answer to yes/no questions from them--but no one else can either.

My fav however is still Charles Krauthammer.
They generally have him vs 2 liberals--

 

[The Judge]

If you think she's a dummy you should see her in the many one on one debates with Dem stratagist.

I never said that Malkin was a "dummy," in fact she is far from it. Her attitude is calculated to say the least but it is also extremely condescending and exudes an air of superiority that I find distasteful and unnecessary. Her hateful delivery is a big part of what is wrong with American politics.

 

[Chadman]

Michelle Malkin:
Certainly no Pelosi

If you think she's a dummy you should see her in the many one on one debates with Dem stratagist.

They are having hard time now finding any that will go on with her.

The only thing I have seen her fail to do is get direct answer to yes/no questions from them--but no one else can either.

My fav however is still Charles Krauthammer.
They generally have him vs 2 liberals--

Yeah, no doubt, Wayne. Hand-picked Fox News "liberal" dem strategists are always top shelf debators, right? Not only are they cream of the crop, they are always given the same open-mic latitude to comment as say, Michelle Malkin, right?

Would LOVE to see MM go up against Ed Schultz (for one) on virtually any political topic, when both are allowed to make points and not be railed in to narrow areas by the commentators on Fox. Comparing the two sides in situations presented on Fox News is laughable, at best. No doubt it goes the other way on more liberal media, but please be realistic.

 

[Chadman]

And, in reviewing the provided link, I see no direct commentary showing Paul saying the US was behind the attack on 9-11. For any person to say they are sceptical of this administration and any administration sponsored "fact-finding" mission, they have to have be given credit. To say you blindly accept what they tell us about anything is pretty silly at this point - for most here, that is.

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

She does get a little testy at times Gregg

Chad I doubt she would dodge going on any network--debating anyone--however don't believe your networks are keen about having her-

--on flip side all your presidential hopefuls have open invite to largest prime time cable viewing audience on TV --and run like rabbitts

--now using the logical part of your brain--what does that tell you?

 

[Jabberwocky]

edit edit edit

 

[gardenweasel]

gw...never figured you for a carol burnett fan...loved that show.

well well well.......look what the cat dragged in.....

worry everybody half to death....the heat in az. is melting kid`s braces......no word from ar182....


and here we are a stones throw from foots` season....

have a heart.......:nono: