DID NOT GET A CHANCE TO POST MUCH ON SAT -WAS HANGING WITH THE FAM HOPE YOU GUYS DID WELL- ALOT OF STUFF I REALLY LIKE THIS WEEK - LETS START WITH SOUTH FLORIDA -2.5 6% NOT A BIG ROAD FAV GUY BUT I SEE NO ADVANTAGE FOR RUTGERS ACCEPT HOMEFIELD -THEY ARE FOR REAL AND I SEE 6-7 POINT VALUE IN THIS LINE
THURS TO SAT
- Thread starter THUNDER
- Start date
Totally agree w/ you. USF is solid and I think they are as good as it gets this year. Gl w/ the play!!
HERE ARE MY THOUGHTS ON THE SF GAME- RUTGERS HAS PLAYED 2 DECENT TEAMS AT HOME MARYLAND AND CINCY THEY GOT DOMINATED BY BOTH- AND THAT WAS AT HOME BESIDES THAT THEY HAVE PLAYED NOBODY AND A COUPLE OF THOSE GAMES WERE UNIMPRESSIVE- MEANWHILE SF HAS PLAYED AUBURN,WEST VIRGINIA,AND A DECENT CF - EVEN FAU IS COMPETITIVE TEAM THEY ARE DOMINATING ON D AGAINST QUALITY TEAMS AND SHUTTING DOWN THERE STARS AND THERE CORNERS ARE SHUT DOWN- RUTGERS D I NOT GETTING TO THE QB AND NOT MAKING THE BIG PLAYS ON D LIKE THEY WERE LAST YEAR-GROTHE WILL EAT THEM UP- RUTGERS D NUMBERS ARE VERY MISLEADING LOOK WHAT THEY HAVE DONE WITHANY BODY WITH A O NAVY,MARYLAND AND CINCY AND THESE ARE AVERAGE OFFENCES SF IS NOT AVERAGE IN ANY RESPECT ,SF WINS 31-20
I AM READING FROM A FEW THAT RUTGERS IS TALKING THIS GAME PERSONAL BECAUSE SF IS NUMBER 2 AND THEY ARE NOT GETTING ANY CREDIT - I DONT BUY IT I GUESS THEY HAD NO REASON TO BEAT CINCY - ALL I READ THAT WEEK WAS REVENGE FOR LAST YEAR RUTGERS GAVE CINCY THERE BEST SHOT IT WAS NOT GOOD ENOUGH- THIS LINE IS ABOUT RIGHT A 4-2 TEAM AT HOME AGAINST A 6-0 TEAM - SF IS BETTER THAN CINCY AND MARYLAND - THEY CAUSE TURNOVERS AND MAKE BIG PLAYS GL
ONE MORE NOTE HERE NUMBERS AGAINST RUTGERS ON D - NAVY RUSHED FOR 255, MARYLAND HAD 460 YARDS OF O, AND CINY HAD 420, THERE D LINE IS UNDER SIZED AND THERE CORNERS ARE MISTAKE PRONE,
- Sep 13, 2005
- 2,895
- 24
- 38
Agree Thunder...what the negative pundits don't realize is that SF has Athletes all over the field. The put a beat down on a real good West Virginia team.
Guys, no disrespect, but if SF was that good, then the line would be much higher. This line is fishy and all I have to say is beware.:nono:
IMO...Line looks fishy b/c books want RU money and that is what they are gonna get with the line movement. Rutgers is not as good this year as they were last. SF rolls by 10+. Let's get'em THUNDER!!!! SF is much better than most give them credit for and Rutgers is getting WAY to much credit. If Rutgers wins, I'll eat my words, but SF all the way.
how can books et more money on rutgers when the line moved down a point...if anything they will get more money on south florida...thats why 85% of the public money is on SF and the line dropped...rutgers takes this game,,,thursday nite, home dog, everyone on sf...it can only be a rutger cover
I've got Rutgers +3.5. The thing that worries me is USF is the Rutgers of last year. So many doubters in the media and they are still feeding off that. I may buy USF back if I can get a -120 ML?
WHAT DO PEOPLE THINK VEGAS SHOULD HAVE BEEN SET LINE AT 6 OR 7- RANKInGS MEAN NOTHING-THIS LINE IS Set WHERE it SHOULD BE-IF VEGAS WANTED MONEY ON SF,RUTGER WOULD BE FAVORED LIKE BAMA THIS WEEKEND OR OTHER UNRANKED AGAINST RANKED- NOTHING SMELLY ABOUT THIS LINE- MAYBE RUTGERS WINS- BUT UNLESS USF TURNS THE BALL OVER AND RUTGERS SHOWS THEY CAN STOP SOMEBODY ALL OF A SUDDEN I DONT SEE IT
So much to like about S. Fla IN this spot. Nice restful last game out, no real look ahead situation, revenge on the side of S. Fla, if anything this is a big focus game for them. I like your take on this one, Thunder. I agree, I can't make sense of the other side, even when trying to.
Good luck to you.
Good luck to you.
not trying to bragg, but was dead on with that shady rutgers line, there was a reason it was -2 on the road, with an unranked opponent and 80% of the money on sf and the line went down
Once that offensive lineman went down for USF late in the game it was all she wrote. Grothe had no time to do shit, and is too short to really see anything. Alot of heart though.
