Kerry asks Goodell to air Pats/Giants on NBC

DR STRANGELOVE

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 13, 2003
27,355
51
0
Toronto, Canada
December 24, 2007
Mr. Roger Goodell
Commissioner
National Football League
280 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017


Dear Commissioner Goodell,

As a Bostonian, I couldn't be more pleased that in just five days, the New England Patriots will attempt to become the first NFL team in 35 years to finish the regular season with an undefeated record. But as someone who represents all of Massachusetts and not just those in the Boston media market, I remain deeply troubled that today as many as 250,000 Massachusetts households, and millions of Patriots fans nationwide, may be denied access to this historic sporting event.

Despite an unwillingness by both sides to strike a compromise that best meets the interest of the fans, there remain several options for making this game widely available. One option is found in what is referred to as the NFL's "flex schedule", which permits the League to switch the currently scheduled Sunday night NBC game for a game of broader public appeal. Electing to air the game on NBC would ensure that every television in America has access to such a historic game. Throughout the season, the NFL has made this decision with respect to other games of high importance and broad national interest.

For a game of this significance to be used as a bargaining chip or point of leverage between corporations locked in a dispute would say a great deal about the esteem in which America's football fans are held by the big interests. Under the unfortunate circumstance that this matter remains unresolved, leaving 60 percent of households across the country - including thousands in Massachusetts - without access to Saturday's game, I will ask the Senate Commerce Committee to hold hearings on how the emergence of premium sports channels are impacting the consumer, and I will consider what legislative measures may be necessary to ensure that consumers are more than bystanders in this process.

I hope very much to see a satisfactory solution achieved. I've offered - and my offer stands - to convene a meeting of all parties with the goal of reaching an 11th hour solution. I hope it is not too late to get something done for fans everywhere. Thank you for consideration of this request.

Sincerely,

John F. Kerry
United States Senate


cc: Brian Roberts, President, Comcast Corporation
Glenn Britt, President, Time Warner, Inc.
 

Eternal

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 17, 2003
513
0
0
Massachusetts
I may get blasted for my opinion on this one, but if I do, so be it. I am a registered independent voter.......I take the Repub side on some things and the Dem side on others....but here is where my Repub side comes out.

The NFL is a private BUSINESS. They have the legal right to make money in any legal and ethical way they see fit. They created their own network in which to air their events which will draw advertisers, who's revenues will all go directly to they NFL, and not have to be shared with a third party network. If cable companies want to offer NFLN as part of an extra channel package, or not offer it at all, it is their private business decision, not something that the government needs/should get involved with. This is not an issue of health care, education, national security, a company "cooking the books" to scam investors, or other subjects in which the federal government should be sticking their nose into.

Merry Chistmas
 

Sun Tzu

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 10, 2003
6,197
9
0
Houston, Texas
The whole thing is nonsense. people outside Boston and NY have no "right" or expectation to see that game. If it matters to you that much get Directv....otherwise shut up.
 

ELVIS

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 25, 2002
3,620
1
0
memphis
I may get blasted for my opinion on this one, but if I do, so be it. I am a registered independent voter.......I take the Repub side on some things and the Dem side on others....but here is where my Repub side comes out.

The NFL is a private BUSINESS. They have the legal right to make money in any legal and ethical way they see fit. They created their own network in which to air their events which will draw advertisers, who's revenues will all go directly to they NFL, and not have to be shared with a third party network. If cable companies want to offer NFLN as part of an extra channel package, or not offer it at all, it is their private business decision, not something that the government needs/should get involved with. This is not an issue of health care, education, national security, a company "cooking the books" to scam investors, or other subjects in which the federal government should be sticking their nose into.

Merry Chistmas

just one more area - f'k me , but especially kerry.tool. how do you make a request then drop a blatant threat..... mr. billionaire, why not pony up for a few big screens, at a few local stadiums and not charge admission. let this dirt bag communist pay for the direct tv and donate the public viewership. why ask the nfl to give up their money. f'n hypocrite.
 

Coach_K

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 3, 2007
665
1
0
Does anyone have any statistics that prove the NFL is making more money since the inception of the Network?

My opinion is that the NFL is being to greedy here and need to go back to the day when all games were on national television but I'm not here to rant an rave about those pricks so I actually want to see some proof that they are making money off this because from what I have seen is that most of the US population are cable subscribers as opposed to Dish and do not want to spend the extra money to get a handfull of extra games each year.

I do agree the NFL has every right to do what they choose however I think they may be taking a step in the wrong direction financially on this one. The NFL needs to except the fact that they will always play second fiddle to soccer as the worlds most popular sport. I am not a big soccer fan but no one can argue that it is not the most popular world wide. So if someone has some numbers to prove they are making a profit please show me so we can decide if it is worth losing fans and possible revenue in other parts of the game.
 

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
I could care less about the politics of it, as a football fan I'm happy it will be televised. This NFL Network bullcrap is getting really old. IMO this is still a sport for the fans (without fans it wouldn't exist), and I'm guessing most fans would want to see this game if given the opportunity. And I'm sure a lot of people who disagree with Kerry's proposal will be watching the game like everyone else anyway? :shrug:
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
54
So. Cal
as a bears fan living in so cal its completely unfair that all bears games arent on my tv every sunday and the sports bar is 200 yards away, i cant take the time to walk across the street......can i get a local congressman/senator to write a letter for me to the nfl commish????

now that i think of it, every u of a football and basketball games isnt televised as well.....can somebody pen a letter to the ncaa as well!
 

Jabberwocky

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2006
3,491
29
0
Jacksonville, FL
just one more area - f'k me , but especially kerry.tool. how do you make a request then drop a blatant threat..... mr. billionaire, why not pony up for a few big screens, at a few local stadiums and not charge admission. let this dirt bag communist pay for the direct tv and donate the public viewership. why ask the nfl to give up their money. f'n hypocrite.

dirtbag communist? Wrong forum, but I am guessing you voted for an idiot pussy ass draft dodging coke snorting drunk driving little silver spoon blue blood cheerleader. Good for you.

I pay an extra 4 bucks a month for the NFL network. Not really breaking the family budget.

bush_clown.jpg
 

ELVIS

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 25, 2002
3,620
1
0
memphis
dirtbag communist? Wrong forum, but I am guessing you voted for an idiot pussy ass draft dodging coke snorting drunk driving little silver spoon blue blood cheerleader. Good for you.

I pay an extra 4 bucks a month for the NFL network. Not really breaking the family budget.

bush_clown.jpg


i have DTV and pay for the direct ticket every year. no big deal. btw, cannot stand bush. truly believe he is lined with $$ from all sides. possibly in the minority that believes that "anti abortion "statements don't give you the green light to slaughter young men in uniform for greed.


however, the gov, and the beloved anti-soldier dick, kerry has no right threatening the nfl if they do not show the game. this guy married into a heinz fortune so if he wants everyone to view the game - he can make a f'n donation to the nfl network. i pay for the right to watch these games every week for the last 8-9 years. sorry, if i do not feel that others are entitled to watch for free.

the Raiders are terrible and i pay the fees to watch them anyway because i am a fan.

maybe i should sue because HBO isn't free either.

c'mon. do we seriously need the congress dictating what sport is on tv ? dude.
 

IntenseOperator

DeweyOxburger
Forum Member
Sep 16, 2003
17,897
63
0
Chicago
Pats-Giants to be first three-network simulcast game in NFL history

Pats-Giants to be first three-network simulcast game in NFL history

NEW YORK -- The New England Patriots' shot at history Saturday night will be available for every household in the country with a television after months of wrangling.

The game against the New York Giants, in which the Patriots could become the first NFL team to go 16-0 in the regular season, was originally scheduled to be shown only on the NFL Network, which is available in fewer than 40 percent of the nation's homes with TVs.

But the league announced Wednesday that the NFL Network feed will be simulcast on NBC and CBS. It's a major concession by league officials, who repeatedly said they would not show the game anywhere but the NFL Network. The NFL had faced mounting pressure from politicians in recent weeks to make the game available to more viewers.

This will be the first three-network simulcast in NFL history and the first simulcast of any kind of an NFL game since the first Super Bowl in 1967, when CBS and NBC both televised the first meeting of the champions of the newly merged National Football League and American Football League.

"We have taken this extraordinary step because it is in the best interest of our fans," commissioner Roger Goodell said. "What we have seen for the past year is a very strong consumer demand for NFL Network. We appreciate CBS and NBC delivering the NFL Network telecast on Saturday night to the broad audience that deserves to see this potentially historic game. Our commitment to the NFL Network is stronger than ever."
 

Dr. Fade

Colllector
Forum Member
Sep 29, 2005
1,476
17
0
Kansas City
I'm really tired of politicians intervening in issues regarding pro sports. Seriously,are there not other issues to focus on?

I payed to have NFL Network. I understand that many cable co.'s do not have it as an option- GO TO A BAR! SPEND SOME $$.
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,864
670
113
50
TX
I'm really tired of politicians intervening in issues regarding pro sports. Seriously,are there not other issues to focus on?

I payed to have NFL Network. I understand that many cable co.'s do not have it as an option- GO TO A BAR! SPEND SOME $$.


:iagree: The NFL is a private enterprise. Just be glad John Kerry did not win President in 2004, ugh.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
43,116
2,164
113
On the course!
I love the spin the NFLNetwork put in their ads the last couple of days!

Telling how they "did this for all the fans".

What a crock of bullshit!!!!! You did it because there was a fuking gun to your head!

And now.....people are going to hear Gumball, and say, "Why the hell would I ever pay for this shit???"

(Oh......except for all of you fish who already do, of course!)

Great selling point! Tonight should be the Hindenburg for this outfit with any luck.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top