Terrelle Pryor ends up at one of the two top BIG TEN schools (OSU/UM). Both end up running the spread offense, (sooner or later) now will the BIG TEN be able to compete w/the SEC or Pac Ten? WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK????:shrug:
I think the B10 competed just fine with the SEC in bowl games this year. UM dominated the game and beat everybody's sweetheart in Florida. Michigan is now actually 7-2 vs the SEC in bowl games. If you include Vandy games 9-2 their last 11. Not too shabby. We all know what the hairless nuts' record is vs the SEC, save the keystrokes. I will say OSU played LSU a lot tougher than the score would indicate, and let's not forget that game was in New Orleans. They killed themselves with 15 yard penalties, plain and simple. In the other NYD matchup Wisky and Tennessee played to a stand still and Tennessee deservedly won a hard fought game.
As far as the PAC10 goes, well we know UM laid an egg vs Oregon. Illinois vs USC was also a debacle. USC has owned UM as well. I will say I think OSU will compete just fine with USC next September. Could be wrong, but at this point I don't see that game as a blowout. It certainly would be nice to see SC play OSU or UM somewhere outside of their backyard. I assume OSU gets a return visit from SC at some point.
It's clear that the B10 has fallen some distance behind the SEC and PAC10, but I don't think the gap is so great that it can't be closed. With UM adding a great coach (of course IMO) and Tre$$el recruiting better than ever I don't see why the very top of the B10 can't rank right up there. Wisky should continue to be solid under Bilema (2-1 last 3 vs SEC, btw) and Illinois looks to be on the rise thanks to Zook's cheating. We'll see how long that lasts. Don't be surprised to see Ferentz return Iowa to the top of the conference at some point, dude can coach.