I assume the part in bold was a good point?:shrug: I guess it could have been if it was at all true. But it's FALSE ...as in totally inaccurate. So what's the point of that?
No... if u dont remember, i said the article was exactly as sent to me... I didnt put any part of the article in bold.. it was sent to me that way.
And what i thought of as 'good points' dont have anything to do w/ Barack necessarily.. moreso excerpts like this:
Install your candidate in an atmosphere of deception because questioning him on any issue involving Africa or Islam would be seen as 'bigoted racism'; two words too powerful to allow the citizenry to be informed of facts.
What those 'facts' are - I dont know ?? Remember, im not making any accusations here..
I should add I wasnt familiar w/ Rich Carroll b4 reading this article and havent read any since.. im not the most political guy so if u want a drawn-out debate im not interested.. just wanted to hear some thoughts..
Last edited:

