Rockport Missouri wind power produces 123% of town needs

Spytheweb

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 27, 2005
1,171
14
0
That's not a typo in the headline. The meters are running backwards and they're exporting the 23% extra.

Rock Port, Missouri, is a small city of 1,300 people, and they just made history by being the first city in the US to be 100% powered by the wind, also making them #1 in the US for percentage of renewable energy. The Loess Hills Wind Farm, built by the Wind Capital Group, employing 500 workers from 20 states for about a year, is expected to produce about 16 million kilowatt hours annually, while Rock Port only uses 13 million. The excess wind power will be sold to other communities in the area.


http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008...t-missouri.php
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,600
245
63
"the bunker"
That's not a typo in the headline. The meters are running backwards and they're exporting the 23% extra.

Rock Port, Missouri, is a small city of 1,300 people, and they just made history by being the first city in the US to be 100% powered by the wind, also making them #1 in the US for percentage of renewable energy. The Loess Hills Wind Farm, built by the Wind Capital Group, employing 500 workers from 20 states for about a year, is expected to produce about 16 million kilowatt hours annually, while Rock Port only uses 13 million. The excess wind power will be sold to other communities in the area.


http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008...t-missouri.php


`m sure that would work like a charm in nyc or la.......:rolleyes: and btw,tedy kennedy doesn`t want to see those windmills when he looks out the window of his hyannisport summer home....

i`m all for podunk-ville running on air...it`s just not practical in a metropolitan setting with a dense population ...

couldn`t pull up the article,but i thought the piece on "green dating" and the "ecosexual phenomenon" to be very.......informative:SIB ....

lol
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
G W you know how they will get energy to a bigger city, don't you? Your just kidding.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,600
245
63
"the bunker"
i didn`t get the joke,djv,but,it`s hard to buy into the legitimacy of this article....

theres not always enough wind to power the windmills,so you have to have back-up......

there are no power cells big enough to store wind power(not even sure that technology exists).....

and it`s too expensive and time consuming to crank up a fossil fuel power source so you have to consider the expense and trouble to have the back up running...

so you`ll still be using fossil fuels a good portion of the time anyway....

in an ideal world,we have a bunch of wimdmills,it`s windy all the time and everybody lives happily everafter...

unfortunately,we live in the real world....
 

Spytheweb

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 27, 2005
1,171
14
0
enercon_e-126.jpg



World's largest wind turbine powers 5,000 homes.


This is the Enercon E-126, the world's largest wind turbine that's currently being installed in Germany. This monster generates over 7 Megawatts of juice, which is enough to power about 5,000 four-person households in Europe. It's got an insane 413830-foot wingspan, and it's specially designed to kill as few birds as possible, which was a nice touch.
Worlds Largest Turbine

Seriously, why are they not installing a few hundred of these things in those empty, useless states between the coasts? They have lots of space, they could use it to power cities where things actually get done, thereby contributing to the greater good of the country. Wind power is as renewable as energy gets, so only good would come out of harnessing it to power as many homes as possible. Let's make this happen.


The world?s largest wind turbine is now the Enercon E-126. This turbine has a rotor diameter of 126 meters (413 feet). The E-126 is a more sophisticated version of the E-112, formerly the world?s largest wind turbine and rated at 6 megawatts. This new turbine is officially rated at 6 megawatts too, but will most likely produce 7+ megawatts (or 20 million kilowatt hours per year). That?s enough to power about 5,000 households of four in Europe. A quick US calculation would be 938 kwh per home per month, 12 months, that?s 11,256 kwh per year per house. That?s 1776 American homes on one wind turbine.

The turbine being installed in Emden, Germany by Enercon. They will be testing several types of storage systems in combination with the multi-megawatt wind turbines.
 
Last edited:

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,600
245
63
"the bunker"
enercon_e-126.jpg




The turbine being installed in Emden, Germany by Enercon. They will be testing several types of storage systems in combination with the multi-megawatt wind turbines.

"testing several types of storage systems"....they`l have to get a move on because when the wind don`t blow,????

it`s back to fossil fuels....

these articles don`t mention what`s used as back-up.....there has to be a contingency....

and for these things to work,most decent sites are away from population centers(don`t see many houses in that picture).....

they`re working on it...until then,it`s nothing more than a supplemental resource...
 

jer-z jock

Blow $$ Fast
Forum Member
Jun 11, 2007
4,564
3
0
Hurrican Alley may be a spot for them:shrug: OR along the coastal shores....wind comes in off the ocean quite often, theres a few of these in the back bays of Atlantic City,NJ.... not sure how much they produce or what they run, but Ive never seen them at a stand-still
 
Last edited:

jer-z jock

Blow $$ Fast
Forum Member
Jun 11, 2007
4,564
3
0
That's not a typo in the headline. The meters are running backwards and they're exporting the 23% extra.

Rock Port, Missouri, is a small city of 1,300 people, and they just made history by being the first city in the US to be 100% powered by the wind, also making them #1 in the US for percentage of renewable energy. The Loess Hills Wind Farm, built by the Wind Capital Group, employing 500 workers from 20 states for about a year, is expected to produce about 16 million kilowatt hours annually, while Rock Port only uses 13 million. The excess wind power will be sold to other communities in the area.


http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008...t-missouri.php

"testing several types of storage systems"....they`l have to get a move on because when the wind don`t blow,????

it`s back to fossil fuels....

these articles don`t mention what`s used as back-up.....there has to be a contingency....

and for these things to work,most decent sites are away from population centers(don`t see many houses in that picture).....

they`re working on it...until then,it`s nothing more than a supplemental resource...

May not be 5-600 homes in the whole town there:shrug: 1,300 people wouldnt seem to occupy alot of houses
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Well we need a engineer to help teach everyone how this will work. It does and will. But why waiste my time. We just have to many who can only think about oil. Just think about some of these politicians and so call news men. There hot air can run one of these.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
From my days with the electric co-op, there is no way to store electricity, therein lies the rub. You have to have an average wind speed of at least 9MPH to even consider a wind project, and you need around 20 or so for consistent production, so there are many areas that can never produce that power.

And, I know full well how much people like transmission lines stretching across vast areas of land - "Not in my back yard" is the term, so moving it from one area to another is a nightmare to accomplish. It's rarely a cost-effective proposal for those that want to undertake it. Mandating green power to current fossil fuel providers as far as energy goes is a tough thing to look at. Most people who talk about it know little to nothing about it.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Chad true but. The plan of Wind 4% to 5%. Solor 4% 5%. Nat Gas 20%. Nuke now 3% to go to 5%. Every little bit will help lower use of dirty coal and oil. And all the new jobs make these things happen. Just maybe most important those jobs.
 

The Judge

Pura Vida!
Forum Member
Aug 5, 2004
4,909
29
0
SJO
PickensPlan.com

America is addicted to foreign oil.
It's an addiction that threatens our economy, our environment and our national security. It touches every part of our daily lives and ties our hands as a nation and a people.

The addiction has worsened for decades and now it's reached a point of crisis.

In 1970, we imported 24% of our oil. Today it's nearly 70% and growing.
As imports grow and world prices rise, the amount of money we send to foreign nations every year is soaring. At current oil prices, we will send $700 billion dollars out of the country this year alone ? that's four times the annual cost of the Iraq war.

Projected over the next 10 years the cost will be $10 trillion ? it will be the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of mankind.

America uses a lot of oil. Every day 85 million barrels of oil are produced around the world. And 21 million of those are used here in the United States.

That's 25% of the world's oil demand. Used by just 4% of the world's population.

Can't we just produce more oil?

World oil production peaked in 2005. Despite growing demand and an unprecedented increase in prices, oil production has fallen over the last three years. Oil is getting more expensive to produce, harder to find and there just isn't enough of it to keep up with demand.

The simple truth is that cheap and easy oil is gone.

What's the good news?

The United States is the Saudi Arabia of wind power
Studies from around the world show that the Great Plains states are home to the greatest wind energy potential in the world ? by far.

The Department of Energy reports that 20% of America's electricity can come from wind. North Dakota alone has the potential to provide power for more than a quarter of the country.

Today's wind turbines stand up to 410 feet tall, with blades that stretch 148 feet in length. The blades collect the wind's kinetic energy. In one year, a 3-megawatt wind turbine produces as much energy as 12,000 barrels of imported oil.

Wind power currently accounts for 48 billion kWh of electricity a year in the United States ? enough to serve more than 4.5 million households. That is still only about 1% of current demand, but the potential of wind is much greater.

A 2005 Stanford University study found that there is enough wind power worldwide to satisfy global demand 7 times over ? even if only 20% of wind power could be captured.

Building wind facilities in the corridor that stretches from the Texas panhandle to North Dakota could produce 20% of the electricity for the United States at a cost of $1 trillion. It would take another $200 billion to build the capacity to transmit that energy to cities and towns.

That's a lot of money, but it's a one-time cost. And compared to the $700 billion we spend on foreign oil every year, it's a bargain.

plan_3tiermap.jpg


An economic revival for rural America.
Developing wind power is an investment in rural America.

To witness the economic promise of wind energy, look no further than Sweetwater, Texas.

Sweetwater was typical of many small towns in middle-America. With a shortage of good jobs, the youth of Sweetwater were leaving in search of greater opportunities. And the town's population dropped from 12,000 to under 10,000.

When a large wind power facility was built outside of town, Sweetwater experienced a revival. New economic opportunity brought the town back to life and the population has grown back up to 12,000.

In the Texas panhandle, just north of Sweetwater, is the town of Pampa, where T. Boone Pickens' Mesa Power is currently building the largest wind farm in the world.

At 4,000 megawatts ? the equivalent combined output of four large coal-fire plants ? the production of the completed Pampa facility will double the wind energy output of the United States.

In addition to creating new construction and maintenance jobs, thousands of Americans will be employed to manufacture the turbines and blades. These are high skill jobs that pay on a scale comparable to aerospace jobs.

Plus, wind turbines don't interfere with farming and grazing, so they don't threaten food production or existing local economies.

A cheap new replacement for foreign oil.
Natural gas and bio-fuels are the only domestic energy sources used for transportation.

Cleaner
Natural gas is the cleanest transportation fuel available today.

According to the California Energy Commission, critical greenhouse gas emissions from natural gas are 23% lower than diesel and 30% lower than gasoline.

Natural gas vehicles (NGV) are already available and combine top performance with low emissions. The natural gas Honda Civic GX is rated as the cleanest production vehicle in the world.

According to NGVAmerica, there are more than 7 million NGVs in use worldwide, but only 150,000 of those are in the United States.

The EPA estimates that vehicles on the road account for 60% of carbon monoxide pollution and around one-third of hydrocarbon and nitrogen oxide emissions in the United States. As federal and state emissions laws become more stringent, many requirements will be unattainable with conventionally fueled vehicles.

Since natural gas is significantly cleaner than petroleum, NGVs are increasing in popularity. The Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach recently announced that 16,800 old diesel trucks will be replaced, and half of the new vehicles will run on alternatives such as natural gas.

Cheaper
Natural gas is significantly less expensive than gasoline or diesel. In places like Utah and Oklahoma, prices are less than $1 a gallon. To see fueling stations and costs in your area, check out cngprices.com.

Domestic
Natural gas is our country's second largest energy resource and a vital component of our energy supply. 98% of the natural gas used in the United States is from North America. But 70% of our oil is purchased from foreign nations.

Natural gas is one of the cleanest, safest and most useful forms of energy ? residentially, commercially and industrially. The natural gas industry has existed in the United States for over 100 years and continues to grow.

Domestic natural gas reserves are twice that of petroleum. And new discoveries of natural gas and ongoing development of renewable biogas are continually adding to existing reserves.

While it is a cheap, effective and versatile fuel, less than 1% of natural gas is currently used for transportation.

The Mechanics
We currently use natural gas to produce 22% of our electricity. Harnessing the power of wind to generate electricity will give us the flexibility to shift natural gas away from electricity generation and put it to use as a transportation fuel ? reducing our dependence on foreign oil by more than one-third.

How do we get it done?
The Pickens Plan is a bridge to the future ? a blueprint to reduce foreign oil dependence by harnessing domestic energy alternatives, and buy us time to develop even greater new technologies.

Building new wind generation facilities and better utilizing our natural gas resources can replace more than one-third of our foreign oil imports in 10 years. But it will take leadership.

On January 20th, 2009, a new President will take office.

We're organizing behind the Pickens Plan now to ensure our voices will be heard by the next administration.

Together we can raise a call for change and set a new course for America's energy future in the first hundred days of the new presidency ? breaking the hammerlock of foreign oil and building a new domestic energy future for America with a focus on sustainability.

You can start changing America's future today by supporting the Pickens Plan
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
This can= Jobs, JOBS and MORE JOBS. Oil can't do that any more. Oil can = some new jobs.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top