Best Late Game

Scoop Mackenzie

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 20, 2003
2,090
1
0
55
Okay my best bets and chalks are biting it while my dogs and totals are doing okay but its load up day so out of the two late games what's the best bet???


s coo P
 

Destructor D

Destructor
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2005
8,640
138
63
Kansas City, MO
I took both chalk on the RL... probably a split, but you have to like Lincecum to throw well and facing Livan... this looks like the better play IMO.

I like the Angels RL as well... they have everyone healthy tonight and Gio Gonzalez is still a kid... should have problems in a tough environment. A's lineup is a joke as well.
 

Scoop Mackenzie

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 20, 2003
2,090
1
0
55
I do like both chalk too--the problem is the Rox are playing good ball and the A's still keep trying any thoughts on the totals?

s c OO p
 

BUCSnotYUCKS

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 6, 2007
11,839
28
0
40
Ohio but not a Buckeye
I think Livan is so bad that even the Giants could put a 3-4 run spot on him easily. I just learned not to bet against Lincecum. As far as the As game...the Halos are at full strength, they're playing an As team who already stole a game, and I just don't see how they beat the Angels 2of3 at home. As also struggle against LHP.

I took both at the RL, gl me!

Stayed away from the totals. I couldn't get a good feel for that As/Angels total, and Lincecum is capeable of going CG and SF wins 6-0...just don't wanna mess with it.

GL ALL
 

Destructor D

Destructor
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2005
8,640
138
63
Kansas City, MO
GL RL chalk players. Hate laying the wood, but you have one SP who really sucks in Livan & the Angels finally have everyone playing and you know they want home field
 

Destructor D

Destructor
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2005
8,640
138
63
Kansas City, MO
i think if u play both dogs for same amt u will make money...i like over on both...gl

Really considered both dogs, but I like playing dogs with at least decent pitching. Oakland's kid was born in 1985 and Livan... you know he sucks.

Lincecum would be NL Cy Young favorite if Webb wasn't having a MONSTER season. Lincecum still might have the best stuff in the NL.

Saunders is scary as he hasn't thrown well lately and might be tiring over the course of the season. Saunders might be a nice fade the rest of the season, but hopefully not tonight.
 

turksure

play the under
Forum Member
Jul 8, 2005
1,362
4
38
OK
see what you mean, got both overs and LAA-1

hopefully its break even on the late games
 

Destructor D

Destructor
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2005
8,640
138
63
Kansas City, MO
Angels are done... San Fran on life support... sorry to anyone who followed my BAD advice.

I should have taken the A's, but you couldn't have talked me into the Rockies with Livan... still have to remember a SP only has to pitch good for a few innings to have a chance and Livan isn't facing the best offense in baseball.
 

Destructor D

Destructor
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2005
8,640
138
63
Kansas City, MO
Better to be lucky than good... Giants win was fairly lucky. Still could get Halos, but highly doubtful.

I said Giants were better play, but didn't see Lincecum throwin 132 pitches and didn't see Livan pitching awesome... still a win is a win.

Saunders SUCKS... guy is tired as he's young... fade when big chalk rest of the way IMO.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top