Hannity -Palin interview

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
167
63
Bowling Green Ky
HANNITY: Senator Obama on the campaign trail, and Senator Biden as well, they often criticize John McCain that his plan is he is going to continue the policies of tax cuts for the wealthy.

For those that maybe buy into that class warfare agreement or think why shouldn't the rich pay more, my question to you is the converse. Why does everyone benefit if the rich pays less or if everybody pays less in taxes? Why is that good for the economy?

PALIN: That is a great question. And everybody does benefit when government takes less from the people, no matter what their income bracket is because our businesses then and our families are able to keep more of what they're earning, reinvest in what they have as priorities.

That's how jobs are created and that's how we are going to grow our economy. But let me talk really quickly about our opponent's position on taxes.

Barack Obama has had 94 opportunities to be on the side of the American taxpayer and 94 times he has chosen to be on the opposite side. He could have either voted for tax cuts or at least not for tax increases in 94 times. He has chosen, I believe, the wrong position on those.




entire interview
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/sarah_palins_interview_with_se.html
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
HANNITY: What was your family's reaction? Was that time to huddle and have a hockey team meeting?

.................................................................

what a softball

a pussy talking to a pussy

:142smilie
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
HANNITY: Senator Obama on the campaign trail, and Senator Biden as well, they often criticize John McCain that his plan is he is going to continue the policies of tax cuts for the wealthy.

For those that maybe buy into that class warfare agreement or think why shouldn't the rich pay more, my question to you is the converse. Why does everyone benefit if the rich pays less or if everybody pays less in taxes? Why is that good for the economy?

PALIN: That is a great question. And everybody does benefit when government takes less from the people, no matter what their income bracket is because our businesses then and our families are able to keep more of what they're earning, reinvest in what they have as priorities.

That's how jobs are created and that's how we are going to grow our economy. But let me talk really quickly about our opponent's position on taxes.

Barack Obama has had 94 opportunities to be on the side of the American taxpayer and 94 times he has chosen to be on the opposite side. He could have either voted for tax cuts or at least not for tax increases in 94 times. He has chosen, I believe, the wrong position on those.




entire interview
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/sarah_palins_interview_with_se.html

even if you go by this administrations #'s............. #'s no one can trust...... tax cuts under bush have created (0) jobs..... I do believe tax cuts can work and have worked in the past but cuts are just part of the equation.....I guess, only in a certain segment of American , can you be this stupid and rise to the level of this hockey mom.....
 
Last edited:

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
I believe anyone that was not for Bush should have voted if they were even there to do so. NO/NO/NO. Rich don't need anymore. If I count right she said reform about 12 times in her answers. She didn't say how that reform would work. She better start with her huspand. I don't think Mc Cain will want him at work with his wife like he does many days as Gov. Or flying around country at our expense. Chit hannity for got to ask those tough questions. Like why do they say trooper gate is all Dems fault. When the vote to investigate what hell she was doing was given by majority Reb's. She thinks shes running for Prez twice today she asked voters to vote Palin/Mc Cain. Old John thrown under bus.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
167
63
Bowling Green Ky
even if you go by this administrations #'s............. #'s no one can trust...... tax cuts under bush have created (0) jobs..... I do believe tax cuts can work and have worked in the past but cuts are just part of the equation.....I guess, only in a certain segment of American , can you be this stupid and rise to the level of this hockey mom.....

-- We had around 95% employment past eight years--thats with increase of population--illegal and otherwise.
So maybe you could enlighten us on math of 0 jobs created?
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
They still want to call this a interview. I listen again and it's more like a Brother asking a sister what she wants for xmas. O'Rilly interview of Obama was just that.
 

qwas789

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2004
229
10
0
66
Columbia,MD
YES let`s reject a throwback to Jeffersonian politics the way it was meant to be. An average citizen rises to the top and speaks.

WE MUST PUT HER IN HER PLACE
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
-- We had around 95% employment past eight years--thats with increase of population--illegal and otherwise.
So maybe you could enlighten us on math of 0 jobs created?

Oh sure, there?s been job creation in the past eight years but what the Bush Administration doesn?t want to talk about is that most of them are minimum wage jobs in the service industry. Meanwhile, they?ve done nothing to prevent the erosion of our manufacturing base, our crumbling financial and housing markets, the weakening dollar and the exporting of living wage jobs in this country.

Don?t look behind the curtain. Look over here - 95% employment! Healthcare, profit-sharing, overtime pay, pension plan? You don?t need those things. If you can?t live on $8 an hour and no benefits, you?re just not trying hard enough. Toughen up you ?nation of whiners?.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top