Wk. 8.

MrChristo

The Zapper
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2001
4,414
5
0
Sexlexia...
7-1 last week, gives a 34-19 (+ 13.37) :00hour

Washington @ Detroit over 43 (2.00)

League: 15-3-1 over (Av. total 41.9...av. score 51.0) away 7+ fav off a SU win but ats loss as home 7+ fav, with <30 mins TOP. [Wash]
7-0 (Av. score 59.6!!) if opp last won ats.


Well, this Detroit D really sucks! Last in just about all major categories, and have given up 28 or more to everyone except Minni...who still gained nearly 400 yards!
Washington have had a couple of down weeks, but gained over 350 yards in both...3 TO's v. a similarly bad D (SL) hurt scoring badly.
Lions (Orlovski) actually showed something last week, scored 18 second half points and actually looked like moving the ball.
Should see some points both ways.

Pittsburgh v. NYG over 42 (1.97)

League: 16-4 over (Av. total 43.2...av. score 51.8) home, non-Div fav, off a 14+ ats win as away 7+ fav. [Pits]
(inc. NYG v. Cinci this year)
10-0 (Av. score 55.2!) if they held opp to <180 yards passing!


Surprising, but Pittsburgh score at home! Just 2 home games this year they've hit 38 and 23...av'd over 28 ppg last year...32 if we take out the 3-0 v. Miami in a blizzard!
Giants 2nd in total offense @ 395 ypg...
...Wow!...now I look, the Steelers are an incredible 21-4-2 over at home since 2004!! :scared
er, over? :0corn

Seattle +5 (2.00)

League: 3-13-1 (1-15-1 this no!...av. LOSS 2.7) any fav off an ats loss as a 10+ dog, with <50 yards rushing. [SF]
0-11-1 (Av. LOSS 7.5!) if they had 2 or more TO's.

...Story of the 9ers year so far really...2 wins with 1 total TO...17 in the rest!
Have held just 1 team under 23 points so far, should they really be favoured by 5 here?
Yeah, beat Seattle up there, but Gore was held in check (20/61), and forget Seattle's QB worries, 'cause Hasselbeck was terrible on that day going 18/36 189 and 2 picks.
Sure, Seattle arre a disaster atm, but SF aren't much (more than a FG maybe?!) better! kurby

NE -7 (1.91)

League: 0-31 SU! (11-20 ats ...Av. loss 15.7) as a 7+ dog off a SU win as home 7+ dog. [SL]
(Cleveland @ Washington last week)
1-10-1 this no. if they had <160 yards passing.
(Also 0-12 under, team av's 7.6 ppg!)

But, I prefer the team here rather than the total, a NE are scoring well and are in a 13-3 ats spot themselves. (With an av. team score over over 30)

Just can't read anything into the last 2 Rams games...dominated by Washington (8-22 FD's, over 150 more yards), but Redskins couldn't score enough to put them away...and 3 TO's, one of whch went the other way for 7.
Another +3 TO game last week when Brad Johnson had 3 picks in his first start for 15 years or so...
...they just won't get those breaks against NE.
And, the Pats showed last week what they can do against a poor rush D.
250+ on the ground, and no reason why things will be any different this week against a SL team giving up 161 @ 5.0. (Denver allow 154 @ 5.4)
SL not epected to scre much at all, giving up big chunks on the ground and Cassel playing with no pressure...
...should be a big Pats win.

Philli -7.5 (1.92)

League: 9-0 (Av. win 26.0!!) home, non Div 7+ fav, total 42+ off a BYE with a non-Div game ahead. [Phil]
(NYG v. Seattle this year, 44-6)
(also 9-0 over this no...teams av. 42.4 ppg!!)

Big favs, with high totals do have a good history of scoring well off a BYE...and with no look ahead game, seems they go even better!
Atlanta have played 3 games on the road so far...lost 2 (scored 9 in both) against 2 top 10 defenses.
(Won @ GB with over 170 yards rushing)...
...but again, Philli 7th overall in total D, and giving up just 3.5 ypr, so I suspect the Falcons wil struggle to score again.

Good Luck all :cool:
 

Statman02

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,063
8
38
Mr C ....Was wondering if you had any inclination to an over or under in the Phill/Atlanta game......I know you do a lot of totals and I really don't but the numbers that have been coming up on my computer are staggering in favor of an under for that game.......the line hasn't moved yet still standing at 45......but I mean I don't remember a game that came up under in so many different situations.....I go back to 1998 in my research and this one has come up with 12 trends to the over and 631 trends to the under.......I know you would have listed it if you had it but it seems like I am the only one showing these trends.......I would like to know if you see anything there or if I am on something I should just bet twenty dollars on it and let it go......... thanks anyway
 

MrChristo

The Zapper
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2001
4,414
5
0
Sexlexia...
Hey guys...

Statman...I show Philli scoring a LOT...42.1 ppg in this situation!...
...so no surprises this particular situation has a 8-0-1 over @ 45.

On the flip side, Philli themselves are something silly like 0-13 under last 13 off a BYE!! (I'll just check that...)...
...yep, since 2000 (includes 4 play-off games and the 'extra' week off in 2001)

Logic (to me anyway!) suggests they shut Atlanta down, so I prefer the favs, but yeah, certainly pros/cons either side of the total.
(Good luck! :toast: )

bj...I've got Miami in an 8-2-1 situation...but I've been sitting on this one for a total!...
...they score 28.2 ppg...so...

Miami v. Buffalo over 41.5 (1.91)

League: 11-0 over (Av. total 37.8...av. score 50.6!) home (-3 to +3) off a 14+ ats loss as a home fav, if opp is off a 7+ ats win. [Mia]

Miami allowing 8.5 ypp, 3rd worst behind SL and Det...so Edwards with his 5th best 8.0 ypp, and 2nd best 69.7% passing should be able to pick them apart and hit some big plays.
Miami have played 2 very strong run D's at home so far (Jets and Balt), but had 23 FD's and 390 yards v. a similar run D (SD) and scored 17 and missed a FG.
23-20 looks a comfortable score either way. :shrug:

McAllister over 55.5 rushing (1.83)

Deuce has been over this number in his 4 full games (last 4), despite having less than 10 carries in 3 of thse games, and playing 3 teams with a better run D (ypc) than SD (Allowing 111 @ 4.2).
Bush has had at least 9 carries in those 4 games...of course him gone now should logically lead to more carries for McAllister.
SD have allowed that many yards to Lynch, Brown, Young and Williams...NE and Jets both had a max of 10 rushes to a person (Faulk and Jones) and 14 to Bush (Oak).
4 a carry...I think he'l get at least 15 carries here.

Gerrard under 220.5 (2.00)

He's only gone over this number once all season...(236 v. Houston but 46 in OT)...276 v. Denver who are ranked 28th for passing @ 240 ypg...
Cleveland are 7th best @ 183, due mainly to their crap run D!
Browns have allowed Romo 320 (8.2 ypp..3rd overall @ 266)
...but no others over this number...and 3 very comparable teams they've allowed;
Wash: 14/23 164 (Av. 7.1...19th @ 195)
NYG: 18/28 196 (Av. 7.3...12th @ 225.3)
Pits: 12/19 186 (Av. 7.6...21st @ 189.5)

Jax throw @ 6.9 ...20th @ 190.

Super price at an above av. price.

:mj06:

...oh, one late cherry...

Jets/Houston parlay (1.45)

League: 0-23 SU (Av. loss 12.4) away 7+ dog off a 14+ ats loss as home 7+ dog. [Cinci]
League: 11-0 SU (Av. win 16.3) home 7+ fav off an ats loss but SU win as home 7+ fav if opp is off a 7+ ats loss. [Houston]

League: 0-19 SU (Av. loss 15.3) any 10+ dog off a 10+ ats loss as home 7+ dog. [KC]
League: 11-0 SU (Av. win 14.2) any 10+ fav off any ats loss as a fav with 150+ rushing, f opp is off a 7+ ats loss. [Jets]

Super spot for the big home favs, while both 'dogs lost big as home 'dogs last week, so look to have little hope on the road here.
KC in a spot where the team av's 9.6...(0-8 under), but like last week I just can't trust tthem not to allow a heap of late points to a team who could (literally) run all over them.
Cinci just can't score enough to keep up with Houston at home without Palmer.
2 big favs, but both look pretty solid winners.
 
Last edited:

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
Christo,

Just wanted to say congrats on that Seahawks play. I was absolutely, 100% wrong on that game. I didn't see it coming, but the Seahawks are just destroying the Niners.

GL with the rest of your plays today, and going forward.
 

MrChristo

The Zapper
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2001
4,414
5
0
Sexlexia...
Thanks guys. :toast:

I hardly expected that kind of result tho...simply figured a turnover prone SF shouldn't be laying more than 3, possibly 4 to anyone.

Could have done with a bit of luck elsewhere tho...

Giants settle for FG's all day, get stood up on the line (when I thought replay pretty well showed the ball was over :shrug: ), Steelers get a TD called back for a hold...

Washington somehow manage only a FG from a 1st and goal on the 1 against one of the worst run D's in the NFL, miss a FG and miss a reasonably meaningless 2 pt conversion...
...I miss by a point.

Miami had a FG blocked, I miss by 1/2 a point.

McAllister; 55...couldn't have pushed for 2 yards on that last run Deuce?...I think he had a -3 there somewhere too...

Gerrard was under until the last minute, when Cleveland couldn't run out the clock...

:director: Frustrating day!!

:sadwave:
 

Hooks

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 14, 2000
3,058
13
0
VEGAS
Chris, , sorry for the frustration.
What blows me away is how the linemakers can even get yds. rushing right on the # :confused:
Let's get em next week.
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top