SEATTLE +5

CartersCubs

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 2, 2008
1,586
4
0
Indiana
I dont understand why everone is on seattle this week.
They havnt played good all year and now they r on the
road to a SanFran team that has played tough at home against the Pats, Eagles, and Lions.
By the way in mid-september they went up to seattle and won by 3.
Someone please explain to me WHY i should take Seattle on the road this week!​
 
Last edited:

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
Yeah, I can't see any good reason for taking the Hawks this week. I'm not sure if people still believe they're a good team that is just going to "snap out of it" or what, but they're very, very bad. Don't know if I'll play SF yet, but I sure as hell wouldn't play the Hawks.
 

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
Why is a very, very bad team favoured by 5 in the first place?! :shrug:

You're right, SF isn't a great team. But when Seattle doesn't have Hasselbeck in the lineup SF is the better team, IMO. And Seattle hasn't been a very good road team over the years, even when completely healthy. They tend to make bad teams look great when they play on the road. To me -5 is a very fair number.
 

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
are they very very bad?

are they very very bad?

in comparison to sea, do they fit the very very bad moniker--if so, what then is sea?

HC nolan got fired--holmgrem would've had it not been the idea that he'll be gone at seasons end.

SF has better defense and better RB and rec corps here, No?
 
Last edited:

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
in comparison to sea, do they fit the very very bad moniker--if so, what then is sea?

HC nolan got fired--holmgrem would've had it not been the idea that he'll be gone at seasons end.

SF has better defense and better RB and rec corps here, No?

Don't forget better QB. And that's not because O'Sullivan is anything special, it's because Seneca Wallace should be playing receiver.
 

TONYDAHORSE

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 17, 2007
777
1
0
New Jersey
Carters,

Both teams are bad. I actually think Seattle is worse and in fact believe that some college teams could beat Seattle any given sunday this year. Be careful, don't throw too much on it.

GL! Hope you get it!!!
 

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
Don't forget better QB. And that's not because O'Sullivan is anything special, it's because Seneca Wallace should be playing receiver.


i actually liked seneca at iowa st. he was fun to watch, almost as much as singletary's press conference. i was ready to run through a wall after hearing him--he's fired up, no news theres though
 

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
i actually liked seneca at iowa st. he was fun to watch, almost as much as singletary's press conference. i was ready to run through a wall after hearing him--he's fired up, no news theres though

Don't get me wrong, Seneca is a hell of an athlete. And he was a very good QB for the Cyclones. However, he's a guy whose game is much more suited for college.

Impressive win by the Hawks today. Really didn't see that coming at all.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top