Couture vs Liddell IV in the works!

BUCSnotYUCKS

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 6, 2007
11,839
28
0
40
Ohio but not a Buckeye
Something told me a this was going to happen...oh yeah, I predicted it!!

Report: Randy Couture vs. Chuck Liddell IV in works for Germany event
by MMAjunkie.com Staff on Nov 23, 2008 at 10:54 am ET

After competing in three legendary light-heavyweight fights, former UFC champions Randy Couture (16-9 MMA, 13-6 UFC) and Chuck Liddell (21-6 MMA, 16-5 UFC) could now meet during a heavyweight encounter at a June 13 event in Cologne, Germany.

The report comes from the U.K.-based The Sun, which cites UFC officials as saying Liddell has been offered the heavyweight main event.

Couture recently lost his heavyweight belt to Brock Lesnar at UFC 91. Liddell, meanwhile, has dropped three of his four past fights at light heavyweight, but he's made no public statement regarding a potential move up to heavyweight.

A source told MMAjunkie.com (www.mmajunkie.com) that Couture is open to a fourth Liddell fight, but we've been unable to confirm is the fight has been offered to Liddell.

With the event apparently in the works for Germany, it should come as little surprise that the UFC invited a small contingent of German press to UFC 91 to see Couture's main event with Lesnar. The 45-year-old Couture speaks German and has long been considered a likely headliner once the UFC does head to Germany, a market UFC officials have continually mentioned as a site for future expansion.

Couture and Liddell took part in a popular trilogy of fights that played out between 2003 and 2006. Couture scored a third-round TKO at UFC 43 to win the first match-up for the interim heavyweight title (former champ Tito Ortiz had been stripped of the title), but the 38-year-old Liddell won back the belt and made a successful title defense over Couture with knockout wins at UFC 52 and UFC 57.

With Liddell potentially tied up with the Germany event, he is apparently no longer being considered as an opponent for Anderson Silva at UFC 95 in London, England.

The Sun reported the possibility of the bout, and though not opposed to the fight, Silva's manager, Ed Soares, last week told MMAjunkie.com that the UFC had not officially approached them about it.

The newspaper now reports that Silva, the UFC's current middleweight champion, could instead meet one of the losers from UFC 92's two marquee 205-pound fights: UFC light heavyweight champion Forrest Griffin vs. Rashad Evans or Wanderlei Silva vs. Quinton Jackson.

The fight would take place at 205 pounds as a non-title affair.
====================

I just don't see how Wandy would want to fight Silva. They had their differences, but it's all been settled since Anderson left Chute Boxe. I'd just be suprised if Wandy would agree to it. If it did, that'd be a meggggga fight!
 

joz

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 29, 2005
3,397
9
0
new jersey
Bleh, really not interested. Lot better fights out there for the fans to see. Couture only has a few fights left adn we have to watch him fight Chuck again? :shrug: :shrug: :mad:
 

BUCSnotYUCKS

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 6, 2007
11,839
28
0
40
Ohio but not a Buckeye
This fight is great for both fighters and where they are in their careers.

Also, read the article, this time it's at HEAVYWEIGHT. Every other time they've faced it has been at LHW. Big Big difference. I think it's possible that Randy tries to do to Chuck what he did the firt time they fought.
 

joz

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 29, 2005
3,397
9
0
new jersey
This fight is great for both fighters and where they are in their careers.

Also, read the article, this time it's at HEAVYWEIGHT. Every other time they've faced it has been at LHW. Big Big difference. I think it's possible that Randy tries to do to Chuck what he did the firt time they fought.

I don't think anyone but you really gives a shit about these two fighting again. HW or LHW; this fight is basically just a way to guarantee one of there big PPV sellers gets a win. This better not be the headliner for the card...... Classic boxing trick put two named fighters at the twilights of there careers together for a payday.
 

BUCSnotYUCKS

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 6, 2007
11,839
28
0
40
Ohio but not a Buckeye
There have been several people on this board who've said it'd be a good match at this point in both careers.

I'm sorry you can't look outside the box and see that.
 

joz

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 29, 2005
3,397
9
0
new jersey
There have been several people on this board who've said it'd be a good match at this point in both careers.

I'm sorry you can't look outside the box and see that.

Point me in the direction of those posts so i can look outside the box and see. :mj07:
 

joz

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 29, 2005
3,397
9
0
new jersey
So 1 person, rawli would like to see this fight at 205 so one can retire 'on top' Far cry from several people :0corn :mj07: :mj07: Great reasoning for these two to headline a ppv as well :confused: A lot more intriguing fights for these two out there.:banghead:
 

BUCSnotYUCKS

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 6, 2007
11,839
28
0
40
Ohio but not a Buckeye
Others commented on it...way to just find 1 reply. Also, has been mentioned on mmaforums and sherdog.

I'm sorry that you think "nobody but me" wants to see this fight. WOW, way to speak for everyone in the world.
 

joz

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 29, 2005
3,397
9
0
new jersey
Others commented on it...way to just find 1 reply. Also, has been mentioned on mmaforums and sherdog.

I'm sorry that you think "nobody but me" wants to see this fight. WOW, way to speak for everyone in the world.

Nah, nobody else commented on it einstein, so all I can go off is 1 post :mj07: take a look for yourself "big boy". :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Why am I trying to convince some kid who takes almost 6 months to send a fantasy check :mj07: :mj07:
 

BUCSnotYUCKS

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 6, 2007
11,839
28
0
40
Ohio but not a Buckeye
Ok, you say that nobody wants to see it, but then you say they put the fight together quote "this fight is basically just a way to guarantee one of there big PPV sellers gets a win."

So which is it? Nobody wants to see it, or do they? Obviously if nobody wanted to see it they wouldn't sell.

You prove my point for me.
 

joz

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 29, 2005
3,397
9
0
new jersey
Ok, you say that nobody wants to see it, but then you say they put the fight together quote "this fight is basically just a way to guarantee one of there big PPV sellers gets a win."

So which is it? Nobody wants to see it, or do they? Obviously if nobody wanted to see it they wouldn't sell.

You prove my point for me.

How did I prove your point? :mj07: Did I say they are still going to be huge ppv sellers after there past performances? Nope :nono: They want to get one of there horses who helped carry and make the UFC the organization it is today a win. Match them against each other and you're pretty much guaranteeing one of them a win, and more fights at the twighlight of there career. "gg" - Christ, how old are you?
 

BUCSnotYUCKS

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 6, 2007
11,839
28
0
40
Ohio but not a Buckeye
You said that nobody but me wants to see them fight. Well, if that were the case, then why would it draw big PPV buys??? Drop it, the fact is, people would want to see them fight again. Just like people want to see Rampage vs Wandy III, and Chuck vs Wandy II, and Rampage vs Chuck III. Understand that just because you may not, that doesn't mean everyone else doesn't want to. You don't speak for the majority, sorry to tell you.
 

joz

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 29, 2005
3,397
9
0
new jersey
You said that nobody but me wants to see them fight. Well, if that were the case, then why would it draw big PPV buys??? Drop it, the fact is, people would want to see them fight again. Just like people want to see Rampage vs Wandy III, and Chuck vs Wandy II, and Rampage vs Chuck III. Understand that just because you may not, that doesn't mean everyone else doesn't want to. You don't speak for the majority, sorry to tell you.

It won't draw big ppv #'s imo. Never said i spoke for the majority, simply believe that the majority would prefer not matching these two together once again. Of course people will buy it, I admit I will buy it, theres always an undercard :shrug: :shrug:
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,601
247
63
"the bunker"
I don't think anyone but you really gives a shit about these two fighting again. HW or LHW; this fight is basically just a way to guarantee one of there big PPV sellers gets a win. This better not be the headliner for the card...... Classic boxing trick put two named fighters at the twilights of there careers together for a payday.

i totally agree joz.....this is one of the least appealing fights i can think of.....

bucs...you really want to see this again?....

i mean,if that`s your opinion that`s fine....


i really don`t see the point...maybe if they`d never fought before...

but that`s me...:shrug:

btw...this will be the main event...sadly...
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top