Blowout Revenge Friday

[Hucklebuck]

System 6-1 Thursday

Princeton -6
Lost 61-43 @ Brown

Niagara -2
Lost 82-65 @ Siena

Loyola Chicago +2.5
Lost 83-69 @ Ill Chicago

I will probably wait to actually place these bets until closer to game time as I see the movement helping us in these.

 

[Theboundbook]

System 6-1 Thursday

Princeton -6
Lost 61-43 @ Brown

Niagara -2
Lost 82-65 @ Siena

Loyola Chicago +2.5
Lost 83-69 @ Ill Chicago

I will probably wait to actually place these bets until closer to game time as I see the movement helping us in these.

My system too went 6-1.... We had alot of the same bets... Since you posted the 1st time this system two weeks to the day (THURS) I have won 22k.... By far the most ever in that period on games alone... I literally have lost only 1 day (a little of 1.2k on Last SUNDAY)... The rest have been 300-4500 a day wins.... Thank you for posting that day and opening my eyes to "See" the truth in CBB and exploit the Linesmaker's obvious manipulation to get the public to take one side more than the other because they "Know" who is gonna cover (90% prob) before the game is ever played. The refs or maybe even players make sure of it at the end.... How many FTs magically were missed by GONZAGA 2nd half at the end to make sure Santa Clara had every chance to cover.... I KNEW THAT WOULD HAPPEN.... I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT.... And I could go on and on... Just want to say "THANK YOU FROM ME AND MY FAMILY" for putting the seed in my head to create my new "SYSTEM".... If I can go like this next year, I will write a book and dedicate it to you....

 

[Hucklebuck]

Princeton -6.5 (Line moved .5 against)
1H -3.5

Niagara -3 (Line moved 1 against)
1H -1.5

Loyola Chicago +2.5 (No line movement)
1H +1.5 -115
ML +125

Have 22 games identified Saturday. 15 are system plays and 7 are blowouts of less than 18, but meet other criteria.

 

[Rocks Locks]

Hucklebuck i am coming up with 29 plays for saturday of teams that got blown out by 13 or more. Am i doing something wrong?:shrug:
Also was wondering if road teams fall into this system?

 

[bleedingpurple]

Thanks to you and bound for posting these plays. I haven't been able to catch all of them but many to increase my bankroll. :00x15

 

[shamrock]

Princeton -6.5 (Line moved .5 against)
1H -3.5

Niagara -3 (Line moved 1 against)
1H -1.5

Loyola Chicago +2.5 (No line movement)
1H +1.5 -115
ML +125

Have 22 games identified Saturday. 15 are system plays and 7 are blowouts of less than 18, but meet other criteria.

Huck, does the team have too lose by 18 +? Because Loyola Chicago lost only by 14 their previous meeting. Can you re post the system rules, thank you

 

[Theboundbook]

Huck, does the team have too lose by 18 +? Because Loyola Chicago lost only by 14 their previous meeting. Can you re post the system rules, thank you

This is ONLY THE 1st STEP TO MY SYSTEM... I wish it was this easy.....

15 pts is what he goes by I believe... And I do too generally... 2nd part is line movement and where the public %s are (important to me), and then last is, does the line make sense....

 

[Hucklebuck]

Princeton -6.5 W
1H -3.5W

Niagara -3 W
1H -1.5W

Loyola Chicago +2.5
1H +1.5 -115
ML +125

I didn't post it, but was driving home from practice and took Siena -2 2H. Too big of a middle not try and take advantage of. Ended up pushing on it.

Bound adds other criteria to his system and he is around to constantly middle and buy back. I place my bets and normally just let them play out.

I will quote from the 08/09 College Basketball Prospectus that got me started on this. I have tweaked it a bit and that is up to each individual, but here is what started it.

"Past 5 seasons, teams that won a home game by 20-29 points were just 282-202 (.583) in the road rematch against the team they had previously clobbered. Teams winning a game by 10-19 points were a pedestrian 781-759 (.507) in the return game."

Factor in that around 45% of these teams are underdogs and it becomes very profitable ATS and on the ML.

My criteria began as 18 points, but as I charted it on my own I found that double digits was okay in most instances. For my record keeping, it is normally 15+. Different factors play a role on why I will go less, rivalry games, injuries, back to back road games, letdown spots etc.

I saw the thread was started for tomorrow, great work guys. Let's make everyone here some cash.

I have been around internet message boards for a solid 7 years. Don't get caught up in this as the new fad and randomly pick one of these games to go all in on, or make up for a bad day. My #s are showing me that this can be profitable over the second round of conference play. There have been some bad days, but playing the ML consistently have helped make up for them. A lot of plays on Saturdays and I normally taper down my units a bit just to make sure I can play every game and really take advantage of every opportunity the system provides. Each person can have their own tweak or twist, just understand that it's gambling and they don't give money away. Fletcher taught me a lot about money management and it really is the key. Sty with your units and understand it is half entertainment and the making money will come if you can stay disciplined and patient.

Good Luck,
Hucklebuck

 

[Theboundbook]

Princeton -6.5 W
1H -3.5W

Niagara -3 W
1H -1.5W

Loyola Chicago +2.5
1H +1.5 -115
ML +125

I didn't post it, but was driving home from practice and took Siena -2 2H. Too big of a middle not try and take advantage of. Ended up pushing on it.

Bound adds other criteria to his system and he is around to constantly middle and buy back. I place my bets and normally just let them play out.

I will quote from the 08/09 College Basketball Prospectus that got me started on this. I have tweaked it a bit and that is up to each individual, but here is what started it.

"Past 5 seasons, teams that won a home game by 20-29 points were just 282-202 (.583) in the road rematch against the team they had previously clobbered. Teams winning a game by 10-19 points were a pedestrian 781-759 (.507) in the return game."

Factor in that around 45% of these teams are underdogs and it becomes very profitable ATS and on the ML.

My criteria began as 18 points, but as I charted it on my own I found that double digits was okay in most instances. For my record keeping, it is normally 15+. Different factors play a role on why I will go less, rivalry games, injuries, back to back road games, letdown spots etc.

I saw the thread was started for tomorrow, great work guys. Let's make everyone here some cash.

I have been around internet message boards for a solid 7 years. Don't get caught up in this as the new fad and randomly pick one of these games to go all in on, or make up for a bad day. My #s are showing me that this can be profitable over the second round of conference play. There have been some bad days, but playing the ML consistently have helped make up for them. A lot of plays on Saturdays and I normally taper down my units a bit just to make sure I can play every game and really take advantage of every opportunity the system provides. Each person can have their own tweak or twist, just understand that it's gambling and they don't give money away. Fletcher taught me a lot about money management and it really is the key. Sty with your units and understand it is half entertainment and the making money will come if you can stay disciplined and patient.

Good Luck,
Hucklebuck

Yea, like he said.... Well stated. Couldnt have said it better than that... Loy looking chitty early...