Percentage of federal income tax paid

Cie

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2003
22,391
253
0
New Orleans
Cie
Does your current position have any expertise in claims adjusting? Have known several claims adjusters through the years and all have been quite successful with all the work they want. I would certainly look into getting in that field. Had one of my friends sons that got into that field via OJT trainie during Katrina. Working down there for bout a year and while he did not make much as trainie got experience and quafilied and now knocking down about 70K.

IMO good field to get into--

Thanks for the input. I am a licensed (LA andTX) independent all-lines adjuster, with 4 years of experience in residential and commercial property and casualty. I have focused mainly on large loss residential property claims since 2006.

Like your nephew, I started folllowing Katrina. I was in industrial sales, and owned a small DME firm, but lost all customers following Katrina. I took a temp position as a property adjuster in 2005 and was recruited onto a large loss team on a recommendation of one of my clients. I intend on remaining in this insustry going forward, but will revert to sales if I don't locate new clients within 2 months.

I would recommend for your nephew look to large loss residential or commercial. Either one would provide a susbstantial increase (75%-200%) in pay.
 

Cie

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2003
22,391
253
0
New Orleans
I hope everything works out for you, It will.... You didn't let your family down... Keep your head up, It's out there ...

Thanks. I probably should've started preparing for this in January, but I received some "bad" info which made me rest easy. In any event, I'm pretty sure it'll be fine. If all else fails, I'll break back into sales.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Cie, not that I know you, I can assume from your posts and opinions that there was probably not a lot you could have done to change the hand you were dealt. You seem very level headed, industrious, realistic, driven, and quite probable to land on your feet - perhaps even find something you like more. I doubt that your family feels disappointment or let down by this, and although there's nothing wrong with using them as motivation, don't let that eat away at you. I remember from experience it's tough enough to stay positive when looking for things without being overly hard on yourself.

While we all disagree here from time to time, I think we all try to help each other in most cases. Sincere best wishes in trying to get things going, and hopefully something will turn up for you very soon. From your outlook on things, I expect it will. Good luck, man.
 

Cie

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2003
22,391
253
0
New Orleans
Cie, not that I know you, I can assume from your posts and opinions that there was probably not a lot you could have done to change the hand you were dealt. You seem very level headed, industrious, realistic, driven, and quite probable to land on your feet - perhaps even find something you like more. I doubt that your family feels disappointment or let down by this, and although there's nothing wrong with using them as motivation, don't let that eat away at you. I remember from experience it's tough enough to stay positive when looking for things without being overly hard on yourself.

While we all disagree here from time to time, I think we all try to help each other in most cases. Sincere best wishes in trying to get things going, and hopefully something will turn up for you very soon. From your outlook on things, I expect it will. Good luck, man.

Thanks for the kind words, Chadman. As it turns out, I have located a position within my area of expertise with a solid firm. I spoke with the claims manager last week, and met with the Director of Operations this morning. He made a generous offer, which will remain valid through April, thus allowing me several weeks to seek a new revenue stream for my current operation. If all else fails, I now have something to fall back on, even if it is in a corporate setting.

Not sure about others on here, but I like the flexibility that self-employment provides. I like-- and in many cases have grown accustomed to-- taking friday afternoons off, wearing shorts to work, taking long weekends to enjoy the redneck riviera with my wife and kids, extended vacations, etc.

Anyway, thanks again for the concern. I am happy to report that things are looking up again.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
:toast:
Great news Cie---agree with you on self employed but as you said -you got very good worse case scenerio--and the anxiety is gone.

Went to work in golf clothes today--left at 9 to for 18 holes and just got home--anticipating more of same tomorrow. :)
 

Terryray

Say Parlay
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2001
9,606
1,583
113
Kansas City area for who knows how long....
AGAIN - I am all for a flat tax and/or a consumption tax, and cutting out deductions, and many of the upper and lower benefits/payments. Are we ALL in agreement to do that? Wayne? Wease? TerryRay? Kosar? Smurph? Etc.? If not, why not?

I think the best is super-simplified tax form, with hardly any deductions, that can be filled out and returned on back of a postcard.

Flat-tax isn't politically feasable because so many folks want some progressivity, even a little bit. If you start out with none, I guarantee Congress will find a way to add it, like the postcard thing I mention.

Consumption tax would have to be around 20% to replace IRS, and you add that to 5% local tax you see in lotta places, that means 25%. And a tax like that on every good and service would cause the creation of a huge black market--with all the inefficiencies, unregulation, crime and loss of respect for law that goes with that.



Cie Grant said:
IMO $250K couples should not have to pay the same as $75K couples, but they should not have to suffer any increases either.

From the graph I linked above, it appears that those earning $153-$387 are paying handsomely at the moment.


Concerning couples income, I came across two good editorials in today's WSJ that Don Boudreaux mentioned on his blog:

In regard to the appearance of French economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez in President Barack Obama's budget ("The Obama Rosetta Stone," by Daniel Henninger, Wonder Land, March 12): In their use of statistics of the top 1% of income earners, Messrs. Piketty and Saez make the same false assumptions that the Internal Revenue Service does. In 1980 income disparity began to take off in the U.S. leaving the top 1% of income earners with a greater share of the income pie. Like the IRS, these French economists use "household" income as their measure.

But consider that 1980 was about the time when large percentages of college-educated women began to enter the workforce. Many of these professional women would go on to marry other professionals. This in effect created a doubling of "household" income for many families.

At the same time out-of-wedlock birth rates and divorce began to skyrocket creating large percentages of single-parent households. It should be no surprise that a two income household has a much higher income than a single-income household even if all workers make exactly the same income.

Surgeons will always make more than janitors, as anyone who has ever gone "under the knife" will agree with, and their income should not be distorted because they are married to a fellow surgeon.

My working wife and I often find ourselves in this 1% bracket, but if we were to divorce we would never come close. It's ironic that the left decries the income disparity between men and women, but in the instance when women earn equal pay it is used to inflame class warfare.

Steve Walde
Easton, Conn.


President Obama's new era of responsibility budget makes it clear that 5% of the population (the rich) must assume more financial responsibility for the other 95%. Fair enough, but is there some new responsibility that the other 95% also must assume? If not, that seems somewhat irresponsible.

Efforts to countermand the laws of nature to create a completely fair society mean forcing equality of outcomes, an end result that isn't fair, healthy or sustainable. History tells us that this type of class warfare never has a happy ending.

R.D. Shipley
Stamford, Conn.


bryanz said:
All you smart guys that cry about socialism vs capitalism have it wrong... Lets talk about capitalism where people that steal go to jail... EVEN PEOPLE WITH MONEY THAT HAVE LAWYERS WITH MONEY.... just because you don't carry a gun, have your manicures and pedicures more that most of hard working woman do, doesn't mean justice shouldn't be as swift & punitive... The state of our nation is not about capitalism or socialism... THAT'S JUST SMOKE SCREEN FOR FUCKING IDIOTS........ There are ethical questions and criminal questions.... The CAPITALIST ARE STANDING IN LINE AFTER RAPING, THAT'S FUCKING WITHOUT CONSENT OR LUBERCATION WITH THEIR LIMP DICKS IN HAND , LOOKING FOR THEIR BRAND OF SOCIALISM TO BAIL THEIR ASSES OUT ! THATS WHAT THIS IS ABOUT... I DON'T SEE TO MANY CAPITALIST TURNING SOCIALISM DOWM.... I'M A CAPITALIST.... I don't get paid if I don't go to work.. I make it rain... my longest empolyment is working for myself (16yrs)... Sick of bull shit from people that couldn't create a dollar if they had to....

Yup, it's an old saying "The problem with Socialism is Socialism, the problem with Capitalism is capitalists."
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top