Cutler formally requests trade from Broncos

IE

Administrator
Forum Admin
Forum Member
Mar 15, 1999
95,440
223
63
Jay Cutler confirmed that he will not report to offseason training on Monday and has formally requested a trade from the Broncos.

After Saturday's meeting, Cutler feels Josh McDaniels, "Made it clear he wants his own guy (at QB)," and didn't apologize for going after Matt Cassel. "How can I trust him now?" Cutler asked. Cutler said he'll attend mandatory offseason work if he stays on the roster, but believes that "Really, it's best for me to move on." McDaniels disagrees with Cutler's interpretations, and the Broncos remain outwardly steadfast that Cutler will not be traded.
Source: ESPN.com
 

Dr Feelgood

StonedPimp
Forum Member
Feb 3, 2001
3,621
33
48
Las Vegas
Being a longtime Bronco fan I am sickend at this scenario.

There is lenty of balme to go around here and I just wish Cutler will suck it up and show them on the field how a true star takes out their frustrations. But this is the NFL, and am coming to the realization that he is probably headed elsewhere and the Broncos are in some serious trouble now with a pathetic defense and a mediocre offense if he leaves...

:rolleyes: :mad:
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
I read that Cutler put his Denver house up for sale.

He is pissed about the Tampa Bay deal where he was almost dealt.

Cutler will not be happy in Denver. They cannot afford to keep a disgruntled QB.

They are going to have to trade him. And they may not get what he is worth.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
got this from www.profootballtalk.com (great site)....it seems like it's about money...isn't that always the case..

SOURCE: COOK WANTS NEW CONTRACT FOR CUTLER

Posted by Mike Florio on March 16, 2009, 11:34 a.m.

With none of the top quarterbacks in the draft pool picking him to be their agent, Bus Cook had to find a way to get his name into the NFL conversation in the weeks leading up to the 2009 version of the rookie selection process.

What better way to do it than to demonstrate his power and influence to the quarterback class of 2010 by forcing a trade of Broncos quarterback Jay Cutler?

Dan Patrick said on the Monday edition of his show that Cook recently responded to a report from Peter King that Cutler had asked for a trade before the possibility of trading Cutler ever arose with the time-honored non-denial denial: ?Not that I know of.?

We?re now convinced that Cook is the primary instigator of Cutler?s discontent ? and also the primary impediment to a meaningful coach-player meeting that could resolve the situation and keep Cutler around.

King told Patrick on Monday that coach Josh McDaniels still wants to have a one-on-one meeting with Cutler.

In other words, McDaniels wants to be able to talk to Cutler without Cook sticking his nose into the discussion, saying and doing things that will prevent Cutler?s currently stubborn resolve from weakening.

Indeed, a league source tells us that Cook?s idea for solving the current impasse was ? what else? ? a fat new contract for Cutler. If the Broncos aren?t willing to give Cutler a new deal, then Cook and Cutler want to be traded.

Cook is a West Virginia native, so we?d ordinarily be inclined to give him the Pat White treatment. In this case, we can?t. Cook has been at the center of too many unnecessary controversies, and he has failed to use his tremendous influence over his clients to persuade them to find a way to make things work. Instead, Cook has thrived of late on destroying existing relationships, for no apparent strategic reason other than to get his name in the paper.

That said, it?s not too late for the Broncos to take control of the situation. As pointed out in our latest SportingNews.com item, the Bengals did it last year with Chad Johnson, and the Cardinals did it last year (and might do it again this year) with Anquan Boldin. When a player is under contract for three more seasons, the team (not the player) has the power to determine whether the player will be traded or released before those three years expire.
 

IX_Bender

Registered User
Forum Member
Im gonna throw this out there as its not news or really being talked up nationally.

3 way trade with Denver, Cleveland, and Detroit.
The idea is that Derek Anderson goes to Denver and Cleveland comes out with picks while Detroit gets Cutler.

Far, far away at this point but a realistic scenario.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
Im gonna throw this out there as its not news or really being talked up nationally.

3 way trade with Denver, Cleveland, and Detroit.
The idea is that Derek Anderson goes to Denver and Cleveland comes out with picks while Detroit gets Cutler.

Far, far away at this point but a realistic scenario.
..................................................................

Detroit would be so much better off without having to take Matt Stafford.

Stafford will bust out .
 

IE

Administrator
Forum Admin
Forum Member
Mar 15, 1999
95,440
223
63
Chicago Bears need to make a big play for disgruntled Broncos quarterback Jay Cutler





When Bears wide receiver Earl Bennett needed a quarterback to throw him passes during Bennett's Pro Day a year ago at Vanderbilt, he called Jay Cutler. It was a local call, and Bennett already knew the number.

Though it is unusual for an NFL starting quarterback to serve in the capacity of practice arm, Cutler obliged. Cutler was Vanderbilt's quarterback in 2005 when Bennett finished second in the Southeastern Conference with 79 catches for 876 yards and nine TDs

The two former Commodores obviously shared a bond from that one season together in college and they also happen to share an agent, Bus Cook.

Of all the reasons the Bears need to thrust themselves into the middle of increasingly realistic trade talks with the Denver Broncos for the disgruntled Cutler, his history with Bennett is low on the list.
But the rest of the reasons remain so obvious that it would be like starting a discussion about Chicago winters by pointing out that it helps to have a shovel.

The Bears have missed the playoffs two straight years. They are a franchise that never has had a modern-day franchise quarterback. They have a GM in Jerry Angelo on record this off-season saying he is "fixated," on fixing the position. They have a defense respected around the league.

They also can read and, despite the lack of activity this off-season, it is presumed their phones still work.

They would offer Cutler a Midwestern option close to his Indiana roots, a chance to play for his favorite boyhood team and, if they're smart, a fat, new contract that helps compensate for the lack of big-play receivers on the roster.

Other NFL teams need quarterbacks too. The Jets, Lions, Vikings, Buccaneers and Browns all have been mentioned in various reports as potential trade partners with the Broncos.

To sit idly by after Cutler officially has requested a trade from the Broncos would be professional negligence by the Bears. One day Kyle Orton still can develop into a solid NFL quarterback. Cutler already is.

Ever been to one of those chain restaurants where the menu specials require you to choose one selection out of different categories and combinations for a certain price? That's the way the Bears should consider structuring any trade proposal to the Broncos.

Under one heading would be expendable players of good enough quality to pique interest: Orton, Brian Urlacher, Nathan Vasher, Marcus Harrison. Pick one, Broncos GM Brian Xanders.

Under another would be corresponding high 2009 draft picks: Orton would come with a third, Urlacher with a second and Vasher and/or Harrison with a first. Mix and match, Broncos coach Josh McDaniels.

The third category would be 2010 draft picks. Whatever the Broncos think they still would need, make it available.

Is clinging to the possibility of a second-round pick next season really worth sacrificing for the reality of a Pro Bowl quarterback? The NFL team that finds a way to trade for Cutler instantly becomes the team that enjoyed the best off-season. The Broncos instantly would have the worst.

Young franchise quarterbacks on the verge of their prime just don't become available every day, every year or every decade. That isn't exactly breaking news in Chicago. Around here, that's like telling people to watch out for potholes.

This isn't just a window of opportunity for the Bears; it's like the doors of an airplane hangar opening wide type of opportunity.

"Really, it's best for me to move on," Cutler told ESPN.com.

Anything else Cutler said before and after that, to the ears of Bears' fans, is just noise.

If Cutler would get another chance to throw to Bennett again in a Bears uniform, Chicago would forgive Angelo for letting unwarranted faith in the second-year receiver justify the GM ignoring available veteran wide receivers on the market.

Offensive-minded coaches such as McDaniels prefer to be so in sync with their quarterbacks that they agree on the same flavor of chewing gum. The Cutler-McDaniels marriage doesn't look like one even counseling can save. These things happen.

Honestly, the reasons matter little in Chicago. If Cutler comes off as slightly petty in all this, fine. It's petulance worth paying for to a team that never has had a quarterback with such potential.
 

BUCSnotYUCKS

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 6, 2007
11,839
28
0
40
Ohio but not a Buckeye
I can only dream that my BUCS get Cutler...

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE, TRADE FOR HIM, DO WHATEVER IT TAKES

Bryant and company at WR, Winslow at TE, Ward at RB, an already very good offensive line, then Cutler at QB? Would make our offense fairly explosive right away.

The defense will be interesting to see though...
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
it seems like cutler's agent is the problem...

COOK KEEPS IT UP

Posted by Mike Florio on March 18, 2009, 10:34 p.m.

At a time when more and more league observers are observing that agent Bus Cook is more of a problem-maker than problem-solver, more evidence has emerged suggesting that Cook, like many other agents, is using the representation of one high-profile client as ammunition for recruiting more of them.

Cook doesn?t represent any of the elite members of the 2009 quarterback class. So at a time when we all should be more focused on the fates of Matt Stafford, Mark Sanchez, and Josh Freeman, the Jay Cutler drama is engulfing the league.

And Cook is in the thick of it.

And we think he loves every second of it.

On Wednesday, Cook offered Cutler?s spin on the roots of the problem that now exists between player and franchise.

?Jay was disappointed in the firing of Mike Shanahan and met with the owner,? Cook told Thomas George of NFL.com. ?The owner assured him everything would be fine. The owner said he had the second-best offense in football and would leave the offensive staff intact. Jay was good with that. Then he hires an offensive coach who gets rid of the staff.?

Bowlen denied the allegation, sort of. ?I really have had no discussion with Jay or the agent,? Bowlen said. ?Mike was fired right after the season. At that point, there was no need to have a discussion with Jay. Now, actually, to be fair, I don?t think I had that discussion. I don?t recall it. I know I?m getting up there in age, and I am not sure of that discussion.?

If Bowlen had the discussion and forgets, there?s a reason for it better than advancing age. The discussion, if it occurred, wouldn?t have been memorable to Bowlen because Bowlen doesn?t need Cutler?s permission when deciding how to run the business Bowlen owns.

And that?s where this soap opera acquired its first hint of lather. Somehow, Cutler allowed himself to believe that being the quarterback also means calling the shots when it comes to hiring the coach.

Then again, Cook represented Brett Favre, who spent his last few seasons in Green Bay under the mistaken impression that he was also the General Manager of the team.

For those who say that Cook is merely a bystander in this process, we couldn?t disagree more vehemently. Cook should have pulled Cutler aside early in the process, and Cook should have explained to Cutler that Favre played for four different coaches during his time in Titletown, and that it?s common for players to have to adapt to new coaches.

Cook also should have encouraged Cutler, explaining to him that if Josh McDaniels was able to help make Matt Cassel into a guy who?ll make $14.65 million in 2009, then McDaniels could make Cutler into a Hall of Famer.

But Cook didn?t. Instead, he instigated and agitated just enough to set the stage for the drama of the offseason, and even if Cutler emerges with a new contract paying $30 million in guaranteed money, Cook?s three-percent fee will pale in comparison to the value of the free advertising he has enjoyed.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
Broncos owner: No room for an unhappy Cutlerby FOXSports.com

add this RSS blog email print
Updated: March 19, 2009, 10:38 AM EST 635 comments The agent for Jay Cutler says the offseason purge of coaches is at the root of the disgruntled quarterback's issues with the Broncos, and the team's owner is not sure the damage can be repaired.

"To tell you the truth, I have no answer to that question," Denver owner Pat Bowlen told NFL.com. "I would like to keep him here, obviously. But if you are going to be an unhappy camper, there is no real reason to be here."
................................................................


Trade Cutler to Detroit for the #1 pick

Denver gets rid of crybaby Cutler and gets

crybaby Matt Stafford :142smilie
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top