Barney Frank sets the Neocon bullshit straight

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Barney Frank sets the record straight.

Is There an Antidote to the Republican Amnesia?

Memory eventually fails us all, but apparently the decline strikes one party far more than the other.

In recent weeks, my friends across the aisle have expended a lot of breath proclaiming that the Democrats caused the present financial crisis by failing to pass legislation to regulate financial services companies in the years 1995 through 2006.

There is only small one problem with this story -- throughout this entire period the Republicans were in complete charge of the House and for the most critical years they controlled the House, the Senate, and the Presidency.

In the House of Representatives, the majority party has almost unlimited power over the minority party. The majority party owns the committee chairmanships; it controls what bills come to a vote; and it is under no obligation to consider the ideas of the beleaguered minority. When the Republicans were in the majority they ruled with an iron first; it is no accident that Tom DeLay was known as "The Hammer."

That is why I find it particularly flattering the Republicans now claim that in the years 1995 to 2006 I personally possessed supernatural powers which enabled me to force mighty Republican leaders to do my bidding. Choose your comic book hero -- I was all of them.

I wish I had the power to force the Republican leadership to do my bidding! If I had had that power, I would have used it to block the impeachment of Bill Clinton, to stop the war in Iraq, to prevent large tax cuts for the extremely wealthy, and to stop government intervention into the private life of Terri Schiavo. Yet that power eluded me, and I was unable to stop those things.

According to the Republicans' misty memories of the period before 2007, I allegedly singlehandedly blocked their determined efforts to regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and my supposed intransigence literally caused the worldwide financial crisis.

Fortunately, we have tools to aid memory -- pencil and paper, word processing, transcripts, newspapers, and the Congressional record. And as described in the most reputable published sources, in 2005 I in fact worked together with my Republican colleague Michael Oxley, then Chairman of the Financial Services Committee, to write a bill to increase regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. We passed the bill out of committee with an overwhelming majority -- every Democrat voted in favor of the legislation. However, on the House floor the Republican leadership added a poison pill amendment, which would have prevented non-profit institutions with religious affiliations from receiving funds. I voted against the legislation in protest, though I continued to work with Mr. Oxley to encourage the Senate to pass a good bill. But these efforts were defeated because President Bush blocked further consideration of the legislation. In the words of Mr. Oxley, no flaming liberal, the Bush administration gave his efforts 'the one-finger salute.'

The Republicans can claim some supposed successes despite my awesome power. In 1999 they passed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which overturned a Depression-era law preventing commercial banks from acting like investment banks. In 2000, they passed another bill which loosened regulation of derivative markets. I voted against these bills -- but to no avail.

Under Republican President George W. Bush, many federal agencies turned a blind eye to activities which would later precipitate the global financial meltdown. The Securities and Exchange Commission decided to allow the nation's largest financial institutions to "self-regulate;" the Federal Reserve under Alan Greenspan declined to use its power to regulate subprime mortgages; the Comptroller of the Currency decided to preempt state consumer laws on subprime mortgages.

Meanwhile, President Bush himself demanded that Fannie and Freddie increase the percentage of subprime loans they purchased, supposedly because of his belief in an "ownership society." Incidentally, increased lending to subprime borrowers would also fuel astronomical profits by the financial services industry. I publicly opposed giving mortgages to unqualified borrowers because I believed that some families are better off renting.

Yet somehow none of this was recorded in the Republican collective memory.


Forgotten too is the significant progress that was made after the 2006 elections, when the Republicans in Congress were repudiated by American voters.

Ironically, this is the period in which I and my Democratic colleagues actually did possess the magical power needed to make real change in Washington -- we became the majority party. In March 2007, just two months after I became the Chairman of the Financial Services Committee for the first time, I moved quickly to forge a bill which would regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The bill passed the House in May, with all 223 Democrats voting for it, and 103 Republicans voting against it. President Bush later signed that legislation into law.

Later in 2007, I introduced legislation to restrict subprime mortgages. The bill passed the Financial Services Committee and the House, but it did not pass the Senate, where because of the filibuster rule, the Republican minority actually does have the power to hobble the majority. The bill passed the full House with all 227 Democrats and 64 Republicans voting for it, and 127 Republicans voting against.

Ironically, those Republicans who now attack me most viciously and whose memories are the most impaired were among those who voted against both bills.

Republicans also forget -- or do not understand -- that the present financial crisis has many fathers. The failure to pass any meaningful legislation before 2007 allowed unscrupulous actors to gorge themselves at the public's expense. Unregulated mortgage brokers sold subprime loans including the now infamous NINA (No Income No Assets). Major financial institutions packaged bad mortgages into securities and sold them as low-risk investments. Rating agencies gave stellar grades to toxic assets while being paid by the companies who stood to benefit from their actions. Insurance companies like AIG issued Credit Default Swaps which magically turned toxic assets into gold.

The executives of some of those institutions now seek bonuses for their fine work. Perhaps my Republican colleagues should ask for bonuses too.

The true tragedy is that this is more than a game. Millions of Americans are now unemployed and millions of others have lost their homes. Well-run businesses have been shaken to their foundations, and the stock market has taken a plunge not seen since the Great Depression. Many people facing retirement have found their savings have been cut in half.

They say that those who forget history are doomed to repeat it. But the collective amnesia of the Republican Party will not only hurt its members -- it threatens to hurt all of us. Is there a cure for amnesia? We can only hope.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-ba..._b_176538.html
 

Terryray

Say Parlay
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2001
9,616
1,618
113
Kansas City area for who knows how long....
Oh yeah! Certainly expect an accurate clean record from Barney Frank! :mj07:

he's notorious for these sort of revisionist productions..

Drinking Barney's pink kool-aid and reading Huff and Puff post :nono:


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hN31-nKndg8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hN31-nKndg8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


Barney's remarks on how solvent Fannie and Freddie are, so stop trying to regulate them!, from NY Times


Barney signaling (in none too subtle fashion) to Fannie to keep the "affordable" loans flowing at a committee hearing on GSE reform in 2003:
"Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have played a very useful role in helping to make housing more affordable . . . a mission that this Congress has given them in return for some of the arrangements which are of some benefit to them to focus on affordable housing."

here's a standard AEI article from 2005, giving warnings about Fannie and how democrats blocking stuff.


As I've pointed out on these pages,
It was AEI, Wall Street Journal editorial page (about every 3 months), Bush's Treasury Sec and his chairman (and co-chair) of econ advisors, and such folks, that were sounding alarms constantly those years. As I said here before, sounding alarm so ad nauseum, that it was no surprise to anyone listening.

and it started even earlier than this, here's Clinton:

"I think the responsibility the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."

The Boston Globe, Nov. 22, 1991:

The federally chartered mortgage company Fannie Mae yesterday agreed to modify its rules restricting purchases of two-family and three-decker homes -- rules that housing advocates contend unfairly exclude low- and moderate-income families from buying homes in Boston.

After a nearly three-hour meeting with members of the Home Buyers? Union, a local advocacy group, and representatives of Mayor Flynn and Rep. Joseph P. Kennedy 2d (D-Mass.), Fannie Mae officials agreed to substantially alter rules to allow what one termed ?hundreds if not thousands? of buyers a chance to own two-family homes and three-deckers. ?

Fannie Mae national spokesman David Jeffers said yesterday that the mortgage company restricted purchases of mortgages on multi-family homes after it saw many such mortgages go into default during the real estate slowdown.

He said the default rate on mortgages on two-family homes is twice that of single-family homes, and the rate for three-deckers is five times the rate for single-family dwellings.

But Jeffers said that after discussions with area homeowners, housing advocates, Kennedy and Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), Fannie Mae officials agreed to purchase the mortgages made under the state?s ?soft second? program, the primary source of mortgages for first-time homebuyers of low and moderate means.

.......

as I've said in this forum, there is much blame to go around. To both parties. But posting Barney Frank productions isn't very helpful...
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
am i gonna have to post that f-cking video showing the dems putting the kibosh on republican attempts to regulate freddie and fannie?...it` on video ....

how many times do i have to post that video?...

yes..they can stop legislation without having a majority...

no...the majority party does not have unlimited power.....he`s lying...


just because this "mush-mouthed degenerate reprobate that likes to run gay call-boy services out of his residence" says it doesn`t make it so.....

chris dodd also denied that he didn`t put the wording in the legislation in the stimulus bill allowing aig to get these bonuses.....

of course he lied...and had to backtrack when it was proven that he was lying...

/i feel like i`m talking to lewis carroll(the guy that wrote "alice in wonderland")...
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
am i gonna have to post that f-cking video showing the dems putting the kibosh on republican attempts to regulate freddie and fannie?...it` on video ....

how many times do i have to post that video?...

yes..they can stop legislation without having a majority...

no...the majority party does not have unlimited power.....he`s lying...


just because this "mush-mouthed degenerate reprobate that likes to run gay call-boy services out of his residence" says it doesn`t make it so.....

chris dodd also denied that he didn`t put the wording in the legislation in the stimulus bill allowing aig to get these bonuses.....

of course he lied...and had to backtrack when it was proven that he was lying...

/i feel like i`m talking to lewis carroll(the guy that wrote "alice in wonderland")...

Am I going to have the video of Bush talking up the Home ownership Incentive from 2002? I know you like to ignore it but just because you ignore it doen't mean it doesn't exist.

Oh, how many bonuses were paid to AIG during the first Bush bailout
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
06/17/2002 - Updated 01:06 PM ET





Bush looks to boost minority home-ownership

ATLANTA (AP) ? President Bush set a goal Monday of helping 5.5 million minority families buy their own homes before the end of the decade, hoping to end what he called a "home-ownership gap."

"Part of economic security is owning your own home," Bush said after touring a transformed model neighborhood of mixed-income housing in a formerly dilapidated neighborhood on Atlanta's south side.

He stood in the red dirt to help operate a machine pouring concrete for the foundation of a new home.

At St. Paul AME Church, Bush said, "There is a home-ownership gap in America. The difference in home-ownership between Anglo America and black and Hispanic America is too big."

Calling for the building of 5.5 million new homes for minorities before 2012, Bush said, "We have to set a big goal for America and we must focus our resources and attention on the goal."

Bush also said that this fall he will convene a White House conference to address the home-ownership gap. The conference will also serve as a forum for ideas on housing. That will help address a situation in which more than three-quarters of white American families own their homes, while less than half of black and Hispanic families do, he said.

The president challenged the private sector to join the effort to create more lower cost homes and laid out a vision of helping black and Hispanic families obtain their own homes by eliminating or easing barriers now keeping many out of the housing market. He also wants to create a new fund to help poor families make down payments.

He also proposes giving developers nearly $2.4 billion in tax credits over five years to build affordable single-family homes. The White House estimates the tax incentive could result in construction of 200,000 lower-cost homes in the period.

Fresh from a family weekend at his own dream home at his Texas ranch, Bush portrayed a place of one's own as a cornerstone of healthy, vibrant communities and stable, financially secure families.

"Home-ownership lies at the heart of the American dream," Bush said as he previewed his plans in his weekly radio address Saturday. "It is a key to upward mobility for low- and middle-income Americans."

Bush toured Atlanta's Pryor Road area where new mixed-income housing developments are replacing rundown and crime-plagued housing projects and strip malls. The Villages at Carver is a new community of neat lawns, fresh paint and secure buildings. It replaced Carver Homes, an older, trouble-plagued 990-unit complex, as part of a national program to eliminate mammoth public housing projects.

While some former Carver Homes residents complain that many poor people aren't making it back to the new development, Atlanta's housing authority views it as a guidepost for the future of assisted housing.

"We've revitalized an entire section of the city in a very short period of time," housing authority spokesman Rick White said. "That has to be a success in anybody's books."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright 2002 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 

Jabberwocky

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2006
3,491
29
0
Jacksonville, FL
Please don't confuse the issue with facts.

Barney Frank bullied all of the major lending instutions in this country into making bad loans to support affirmative action causing the global economic meltdown.
 

Jabberwocky

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2006
3,491
29
0
Jacksonville, FL
what piece of legislation was put forth by the Republican majority from 2000-2006? I could give a shit about rhetoric. Show me the legislative efforts.

The Republicans are now regulation wonks. You just can't make this shit up.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
Am I going to have the video of Bush talking up the Home ownership Incentive from 2002? I know you like to ignore it but just because you ignore it doen't mean it doesn't exist.

Oh, how many bonuses were paid to AIG during the first Bush bailout

am i gonna have to bring up the community reinvestment act of 1977 thanks to jimmy"i kiss middle eastern ass" carter?....

or the fact that dodd and the obama administration are "solely"(with the exclusion of republicans) responsible for the bonuses the aig honchos are getting?...

that nancy pelosi wants open borders and no employer crackdowns on illegals driving down american wages?..

that sarah palin is rejecting bailout cash?...

that obama just hung a "kick me" sign on america`s back by kissing iran`s ass on the nuclear proliferation issue?.....instead of offering carrots and sticks he`s offering them milk and cookies...

i`m sure you guys are happy that we now have our first rock-star president. ...and it`s obvious that he `s totally up to the task of acting like a celebrity...

today, he gets on a video, full of charm and conciliation, and offers an olive branch to iran.... he even knew the name of the muslim holiday they're celebrating.....it`s great that he told the world, in his first week as president, that he used to practice islam....i`m sure that really wowed 'em....

i`m sure that iran is going to totally change now...:lol:

he`s cutting the military while russia is going full steam ahead expanding their military(well,they actually drill for their own oil..so they have some cash to spend).......

the economy is in a serious tailspin...inflation is growing and will only get worse as the treasury printing presses are working overtime...

we're in a trade war with mexico...the congress has just passed retroactive laws to tax people they don't like at 90% after they included the stipultion allowing it (which happens to be a violation of the constitution, but what the hell...a minor detail).....

and pres. teleprompter?...he has time to practice bowling....he has time to go on the tonighht show and impress everybody with what a great guy he is....fill out his ncaa tourney bracket...

what a leader!!..

i suggest he take up piano...this way, he'll have something to do while the u.s. economy burns....


:142squint
 
Last edited:

Terryray

Say Parlay
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2001
9,616
1,618
113
Kansas City area for who knows how long....
oops! forgot about this tread from other day...

oops! forgot about this tread from other day...

some interesting history for us policy geeks...


major bills presented by Republicans:

.....

H.R. 2575, Secondary Mortgage Market Enterprises Regulatory Improvement Act

Introduced by Rep. Richard Baker (R-LA) on June 24, 2003

"The bill would have created a strong, independent regulator to oversee the companies? mission and their safety and soundness, and provided the regulator with the same authority as the bank regulators to establish risk and capital standards. It also gave the regulator authority to take corrective action including receivership authority."

...

H.R.2803 introduced on 21 July 2003 by Rep. Edward R Royce (R-CA,40).

Title: To establish the Office of Housing Finance Oversight in the Department of the Treasury to ensure the financial safety and soundness of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal home loan banks

...

S.1508, introduced 31 July 2003 by Sen Chuck Hagel (R-NE).
Title: A bill to address regulation of secondary mortgage market enterprises, and for other purposes.

....

H.R. 1461: 2005-2006 Federal Housing Finance Reform Act of 2005 - Introduced by Rep. Richard Baker (R-LA)

To reform the regulation of certain housing-related Government-sponsored enterprises, and for other purposes.

...

McCain co-sponsored above bill in Senate as S. 190 in 2005, and said then he did it "to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole."




---------------------------------------------


On to the a few details:

on 2003 H.R. 2575 bill, NY Times reported:

"Among the groups denouncing the proposal today were the National Association of Home Builders and Congressional Democrats who fear that tighter regulation of the companies could sharply reduce their commitment to financing low-income and affordable housing."


.....

The big H.R. 1461 bill got so changed by Congress, it actually made matters worse, and was no reform at all. And not because of the poison pill. Barney don't mention that! But it is the one shining moment for Barney, as he did dutifully round up democratic votes for it and worked hard with Oxley.

Bush opposed it (as Barney said above "gave his efforts 'the one-finger salute.") because Bush wanted a stronger one passed, didn't wanna waste the resources on this one, passage of which could also forestall efforts for any strong one ("we already passed a bill to address that" you know those busy folks would say). Barney don't mention that part of the story, of course.

Bush's treasury secty urged him to compromise, Bush didn't.

but, of course, Bush didn't work real hard to pass one either -- it woulda required a major focused effort -- despite repeated strong words and warnings by him, Treasury, his econ advisors and Greenspan.

I'm sure he regrets that now!


....

And, yes, the only bill that got passed was Barney's. We saw how well that helped! It was the sort of weak, ineffectual bill Bush worried would get passed so folks could say "we did something", but as politician do, confuse that with doing something good.

way too little, way too late---long after it became obvious something had to be done, after years and years and years of numerous repeated warnings.

But good ol' Barney late as 2008, in clip here, saying Fannie & Freddie are "OK..some soundness there" in part due to his fine bill....2008! :mj07:


as I've said before, plenty of blame to go around.

But 80% of the strong warnings and words came from Republicans and thier brethren on blogs and Wall Street Journal pages, National Review, etc.

You could argue, I suppose, that since Republicans sensed the impending problem--and were in charge and passed nothing--they actually should stand more blame than the many democrats that fought against all the reform and pooh-poohed the warnings.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
167
63
Bowling Green Ky
some interesting history for us policy geeks...


major bills presented by Republicans:

.....

H.R. 2575, Secondary Mortgage Market Enterprises Regulatory Improvement Act

Introduced by Rep. Richard Baker (R-LA) on June 24, 2003

"The bill would have created a strong, independent regulator to oversee the companies? mission and their safety and soundness, and provided the regulator with the same authority as the bank regulators to establish risk and capital standards. It also gave the regulator authority to take corrective action including receivership authority."

...

H.R.2803 introduced on 21 July 2003 by Rep. Edward R Royce (R-CA,40).

Title: To establish the Office of Housing Finance Oversight in the Department of the Treasury to ensure the financial safety and soundness of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal home loan banks

...

S.1508, introduced 31 July 2003 by Sen Chuck Hagel (R-NE).
Title: A bill to address regulation of secondary mortgage market enterprises, and for other purposes.

....

H.R. 1461: 2005-2006 Federal Housing Finance Reform Act of 2005 - Introduced by Rep. Richard Baker (R-LA)

To reform the regulation of certain housing-related Government-sponsored enterprises, and for other purposes.

...

McCain co-sponsored above bill in Senate as S. 190 in 2005, and said then he did it "to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole."




---------------------------------------------


On to the a few details:

on 2003 H.R. 2575 bill, NY Times reported:

"Among the groups denouncing the proposal today were the National Association of Home Builders and Congressional Democrats who fear that tighter regulation of the companies could sharply reduce their commitment to financing low-income and affordable housing."


.....

The big H.R. 1461 bill got so changed by Congress, it actually made matters worse, and was no reform at all. And not because of the poison pill. Barney don't mention that! But it is the one shining moment for Barney, as he did dutifully round up democratic votes for it and worked hard with Oxley.

Bush opposed it (as Barney said above "gave his efforts 'the one-finger salute.") because Bush wanted a stronger one passed, didn't wanna waste the resources on this one, passage of which could also forestall efforts for any strong one ("we already passed a bill to address that" you know those busy folks would say). Barney don't mention that part of the story, of course.

Bush's treasury secty urged him to compromise, Bush didn't.

but, of course, Bush didn't work real hard to pass one either -- it woulda required a major focused effort -- despite repeated strong words and warnings by him, Treasury, his econ advisors and Greenspan.

I'm sure he regrets that now!


....

And, yes, the only bill that got passed was Barney's. We saw how well that helped! It was the sort of weak, ineffectual bill Bush worried would get passed so folks could say "we did something", but as politician do, confuse that with doing something good.

way too little, way too late---long after it became obvious something had to be done, after years and years and years of numerous repeated warnings.

But good ol' Barney late as 2008, in clip here, saying Fannie & Freddie are "OK..some soundness there" in part due to his fine bill....2008! :mj07:


as I've said before, plenty of blame to go around.

But 80% of the strong warnings and words came from Republicans and thier brethren on blogs and Wall Street Journal pages, National Review, etc.

You could argue, I suppose, that since Republicans sensed the impending problem--and were in charge and passed nothing--they actually should stand more blame than the many democrats that fought against all the reform and pooh-poohed the warnings.

Nice research Terry--I'll add this to thread on financial crisis debate thread-thank you :thumb:
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
am i gonna have to bring up the community reinvestment act of 1977 thanks to jimmy"i kiss middle eastern ass" carter?....

or the fact that dodd and the obama administration are "solely"(with the exclusion of republicans) responsible for the bonuses the aig honchos are getting?...

that nancy pelosi wants open borders and no employer crackdowns on illegals driving down american wages?..

that sarah palin is rejecting bailout cash?...

that obama just hung a "kick me" sign on america`s back by kissing iran`s ass on the nuclear proliferation issue?.....instead of offering carrots and sticks he`s offering them milk and cookies...

i`m sure you guys are happy that we now have our first rock-star president. ...and it`s obvious that he `s totally up to the task of acting like a celebrity...

today, he gets on a video, full of charm and conciliation, and offers an olive branch to iran.... he even knew the name of the muslim holiday they're celebrating.....it`s great that he told the world, in his first week as president, that he used to practice islam....i`m sure that really wowed 'em....

i`m sure that iran is going to totally change now...:lol:

he`s cutting the military while russia is going full steam ahead expanding their military(well,they actually drill for their own oil..so they have some cash to spend).......

the economy is in a serious tailspin...inflation is growing and will only get worse as the treasury printing presses are working overtime...

we're in a trade war with mexico...the congress has just passed retroactive laws to tax people they don't like at 90% after they included the stipultion allowing it (which happens to be a violation of the constitution, but what the hell...a minor detail).....

and pres. teleprompter?...he has time to practice bowling....he has time to go on the tonighht show and impress everybody with what a great guy he is....fill out his ncaa tourney bracket...

what a leader!!..

i suggest he take up piano...this way, he'll have something to do while the u.s. economy burns....


:142squint

Just one question to Weasel and et al. How did AIG use the first bailout money given them?
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top