100 Days

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2009/04/...red-days-looking-through-the-lens-of-history/

David Gergen | Bio
AC360? Contributor
CNN Senior Political Analyst

How should one assess the First Hundred Days of President Obama?

I come at this question through an experience of some years ago. After he won the presidential election of 1980, Ronald Reagan asked his transition team to come up with an action plan for his early weeks in office. I was a co-captain of that team with Richard Wirthlin and headed up a research project to study the First Hundred Days of other recent presidents ? FDR, Ike, Kennedy, Nixon and Carter.

Let me outline our 3 conclusions and see how President Obama stacks up:

First, the public makes a fresh evaluation of a president the day he takes office. Until then they have only known him as a candidate and possibly as a Senator or Governor. But as soon as he enters the White House, they look at him anew: Is he really up to the job? Can we trust him? Does he know where he wants to go? Do we want to go there too? Or does buyer?s remorse set in?

Some presidents pass the test with flying colors ? think FDR, Ike and then Reagan. Others disappoint ? think Ford and Carter. From my perspective, Barack Obama has struck most Americans as one of the most promising presidents we have seen. Indeed, a major historian told me recently that ?he is the single most impressive man I have witnessed in my adult lifetime? ? and I am not at all sure that this historian voted for him.


Obama is smart, steady, articulate, and listens. As Strobe Talbott, head of Brookings, told a journalist about his performance at the G-20, he managed to be a leader without being boss. How Obama maintains his equanimity is one of the mysteries of the day, but he has an inner calm ? almost a Hawaian Zen ? that is calming for the country. FDR and Reagan brought a contagious optimism to the job that gave people hope; Obama brings a calm that helps to banish fear and gives people strength for the journey.

Second, the First Hundred Days provide an opportunity for a president to put a firm thematic stamp upon his entire administration. FDR became ?Doctor New Deal?, and Ike became the man who would bring peace to Korea. By contrast, Carter?s presidency seemed scatted and without a theme, overshadowing people?s sense that he was also a man of high principles and character.

Obama?s early presidency has been a whirlwind, as he tackles a new issue or crisis almost everyday. It is hard to remember a president who has so dominated the news the way he has. By most traditional standards, he is trying to do too much ? and is almost certain to drop one or two balls along the way ? but I must say that perhaps he can pull it off. Most traditionalists, after all, thought he couldn?t make it to the Democratic nomination, much less to the White House. And what has emerged is a theme of sweeping change ? and clearly, that is what voters wanted back in November when they delivered a strong victory for him. Clearly, he has not been as successful at convincing the public that he is on the right track on everything ? and nowhere near as successful in convincing people that he is up to the job ? but he deserves good marks here, too.

Third and finally, our study for Reagan found that the First Hundred Days are also a time of great peril ? a time when presidents make some of their biggest mistakes. Kennedy had his Bay of Pigs in the First Hundred Days; Ford had his pardon of Nixon (a courageous act but one that was badly executed and wound up helping him lose the presidency in 1976). Carter had a small disaster over water projects and a bigger one with the ill-fated way he announced a sweeping plan to achieve energy independence (we never got there).

How does Obama fare here? Well, one has to say that he has been extremely successful in avoiding big, obvious mistakes. By my lights, he has made some smaller mistakes ? the way he first handled the AIG bonuses, the way he waffled for a while on the ?torture memos? ? but he and his team deserve credit for avoiding big, obvious, crippling mistakes.

But we should reserve final judgment on this one, for the truth is that he has set us on an economic course that is extraordinarily important for the country. It may work ? let us hope for the country?s sake that it does ? but then again, it may not. Will his bailout of the banks really work, or are we facing far more bailouts? What about Detroit? Will the stimulus plan actually work as advertised? Will the economy truly bounce back or just limp along? And longer term, what will come from these annual trillion dollar deficits that his budget will bring in the decade ahead? Good or bad for the country? On all of this, we just cannot be certain yet.

Bottom line: President Obama is off to an excellent start as a leader. He is one of the most promising and impressive men we have had in this office in many a year. His programmatic efforts are also strong, though not in the stratosphere. But we don?t yet have the full story on how all this will turn out. It?s as if we have just finished reading the first chapter and are asked how the book will compare to War and Peace. We don?t know yet. But we do know this: the Obama presidency has become one of the most fascinating and fateful in the history of the Republic.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,487
165
63
Bowling Green Ky
Believe there are a few FACTS he ommitted from his bottom line--

Letws start with some statistical headlines as he completes his 100 days-then lets not forget he has almost quadrupled debt in 1st 100 days-

Related Content from NYDailyNews.com


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

--and before you follow in Gumby's ghetto "its not my fault" rhetoric--let me put up fact check from liberal AP on topic--

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090430/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_fact_check_obama

OBAMA: "Number one, we inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit. ... That wasn't me." ? in Missouri.

THE FACTS:
Congress, under Democratic control in 2007 and 2008, held the purse strings that led to the deficit Obama inherited. A Republican president, George W. Bush, had a role too: He signed the legislation.
Obama supported the emergency financial bailout package in Bush's final months ? a package Democratic leaders wanted to make bigger.
To be sure, Obama opposed the Iraq war, a drain on federal coffers for six years before he became president. But with one major exception, he voted in support of Iraq war spending. The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has estimated Obama's policy proposals would add a net $428 billion to the deficit over four years, even accounting for his spending reduction goals. Now, the deficit is nearly quadrupling to $1.75 trillion.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--I find it remarkable you a pelosi thought those time were worse since great depression--and now we are on ringt track :)
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
Believe there are a few FACTS he ommitted from his bottom line--

Letws start with some statistical headlines as he completes his 100 days-then lets not forget he has almost quadrupled debt in 1st 100 days-

Related Content from NYDailyNews.com


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

--and before you follow in Gumby's ghetto "its not my fault" rhetoric--let me put up fact check from liberal AP on topic--

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090430/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_fact_check_obama

OBAMA: "Number one, we inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit. ... That wasn't me." ? in Missouri.

THE FACTS:
Congress, under Democratic control in 2007 and 2008, held the purse strings that led to the deficit Obama inherited. A Republican president, George W. Bush, had a role too: He signed the legislation.
Obama supported the emergency financial bailout package in Bush's final months ? a package Democratic leaders wanted to make bigger.
To be sure, Obama opposed the Iraq war, a drain on federal coffers for six years before he became president. But with one major exception, he voted in support of Iraq war spending. The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has estimated Obama's policy proposals would add a net $428 billion to the deficit over four years, even accounting for his spending reduction goals. Now, the deficit is nearly quadrupling to $1.75 trillion.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--I find it remarkable you a pelosi thought those time were worse since great depression--and now we are on ringt track :)

Bush started two unnecessary wars. How difficult is that for you to understand?
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
By the way....that article was written by someone who worked in the Reagan cabinet. :shrug:
 
Last edited:

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,855
660
113
50
TX
miserable failure, the worst President we have had in our History

lie, cheat steal did you expect anything else from Obama?
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
Maybe it's just me but : how can Obama and his supporters claim anything after 100 days ? How can his detractors hang unemployment and the economy on him after 100 days ????? To early to tell... Forget history . Just go back to the last administration.. Who would have thought, after 100 days of bush/cheney, America and the World would be where we are right now. TO EARLY... WAY TO EARLY... SIDE NOTE : Can't believe the same people that were saying the fundamentals of the economy were strong late last yr... Now they want to post all these negative #'s and hang it on Obama.... :shrug: .............. 8yrs is a lot to overcome in 100 days.... America may not get to where most patriots are hoping for under Obama but, we know what we lived threw and have to overcome, because of bush/cheney..... DTB : funny how you believe the #'s now !`
 
Last edited:

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
miserable failure, the worst President we have had in our History

lie, cheat steal did you expect anything else from Obama?

partisanship is one thing .. you can't be serious... are you ? if you are.. God bless you.. let's go back to the last 8yrs... line forms to the anti- American EXTREME RIGHT....NO rush, don't think you'll need to take a #....:kiss:
 
Last edited:

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,487
165
63
Bowling Green Ky
Maybe it's just me but : how can Obama and his supporters claim anything after 100 days ? How can his detractors hang unemployment and the economy on him after 100 days ????? To early to tell... Forget history . Just go back to the last administration.. Who would have thought, after 100 days of bush/cheney, America and the World would be where we are right now. TO EARLY... WAY TO EARLY... SIDE NOTE : Can't believe the same people that were saying the fundamentals of the economy were strong late last yr... Now they want to post all these negative #'s and hang it on Obama.... :shrug: .............. 8yrs is a lot to overcome in 100 days.... America may not get to where most patriots are hoping for under Obama but, we know what we lived threw and have to overcome, because of bush/cheney..... DTB : funny how you believe the #'s now !`

Mr B I certainly don't think it is fair to judge person on 1st 100 days --I'm just trying respond to those "swooning" with opinion--while ommitting the facts of the matter.

While I got you here maybe you could tell me which piece of legislation passed in past 100 days effects you positively.

I'm trying my hardest to think of one for myself and am drawing blanks?
--and can't see next one to pass any benefit either--credit card-2nd mortages/home equity loans bailouts.

Appears to me the dead beats are only ones having anything to :00hour about

--on the responsible peoples dime-am I wrong:shrug:
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
Mr B I certainly don't think it is fair to judge person on 1st 100 days --I'm just trying respond to those "swooning" with opinion--while ommitting the facts of the matter.

While I got you here maybe you could tell me which piece of legislation passed in past 100 days effects you positively.

I'm trying my hardest to think of one for myself and am drawing blanks?
--and can't see next one to pass any benefit either--credit card-2nd mortages/home equity loans bailouts.

Appears to me the dead beats are only ones having anything to :00hour about

--on the responsible peoples dime-am I wrong:shrug:

I don't look for legislation/ help from the government.... I look for gov to not slow or get in the way of progress for working and poor America... If you don't think these credit card companies need to be checked, you should take a closer look .. One thing to make a profit, another to extort. ...
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
Mr B I certainly don't think it is fair to judge person on 1st 100 days --I'm just trying respond to those "swooning" with opinion--while ommitting the facts of the matter.

While I got you here maybe you could tell me which piece of legislation passed in past 100 days effects you positively.

I'm trying my hardest to think of one for myself and am drawing blanks?
--and can't see next one to pass any benefit either--credit card-2nd mortages/home equity loans bailouts.

Appears to me the dead beats are only ones having anything to :00hour about

--on the responsible peoples dime-am I wrong:shrug:

I have no problem with credit card reform, there are plenty of responsible credit card holders that would agree with me. If you don't have the knowledge, time and the position of strenght to engage these companies , your screwed. Whats wrong with bailouts for SOME 2nd mortages and home equity loans ??? We bailed out the lenders.. We should look at bailling out (SOME of the SOVABLE lendies...
 
Last edited:

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
--so I can take take that as--
nothing has been of benefit to you either :)

take it any way you want... I make my way, no matter what... obviously, the better the strenght of the entire economy the easier it is.. If we get a reprieve from the bush/cheney yrs, I'll take it but wont count on it... I stil have to do, what I have to do.. Nice to get a ham sandwich here and there, I just don't count on it...
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,487
165
63
Bowling Green Ky
Mr B just finished reading the articlein Atlantic--a liberal publication--pretty much sums things up


Up until now, Obama has largely done the fun part of governing: promising people free stuff. To be sure, even some of that is fairly unpopular, but the auto bailouts have undoubtedly pleased the UAW more than they have angered the rest of the population, and most of the bank spending has occurred under programs originated in the Bush administration. Now, however, the bill for Obama's central proposals is about to come due. Unless Obama thinks he can borrow something like a trillion dollars a year indefinitely, he is going to have to ask Americans to make sacrifices to pay for the goodies.
And the taxes needed to pay for the new programs are not the only costs he will ask us to bear. Like most as yet unimplemented programs theoretically designed to make the world a better place, a cap-and-trade regime for reducing carbon emissions polls well. But when Americans actually have to start paying more for gas, electricity, and heating oil, they will not be so enthusiastic -- especially if their budgets are still shrinking. And if health care is not to carry a shocking price tag, it will have to achieve some sort of savings through rationing: drug makers simply don't make enough in profits to foot the entire bill through lower pharmaceutical prices. Richard Epstein has argued convincingly that ClintonCare foundered because most American voters have health insurance they are satisfied with. In theory, they support a government health care program--but when they are confronted by the details of how their health care will change, that support evaporates.
Neither Obama's legacy, nor the economy's performance, will be much affected by what has happened in these early days. The real test for both will be how he handles the tough choices ahead.
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
Mr B just finished reading the articlein Atlantic--a liberal publication--pretty much sums things up


Up until now, Obama has largely done the fun part of governing: promising people free stuff. To be sure, even some of that is fairly unpopular, but the auto bailouts have undoubtedly pleased the UAW more than they have angered the rest of the population, and most of the bank spending has occurred under programs originated in the Bush administration. Now, however, the bill for Obama's central proposals is about to come due. Unless Obama thinks he can borrow something like a trillion dollars a year indefinitely, he is going to have to ask Americans to make sacrifices to pay for the goodies.
And the taxes needed to pay for the new programs are not the only costs he will ask us to bear. Like most as yet unimplemented programs theoretically designed to make the world a better place, a cap-and-trade regime for reducing carbon emissions polls well. But when Americans actually have to start paying more for gas, electricity, and heating oil, they will not be so enthusiastic -- especially if their budgets are still shrinking. And if health care is not to carry a shocking price tag, it will have to achieve some sort of savings through rationing: drug makers simply don't make enough in profits to foot the entire bill through lower pharmaceutical prices. Richard Epstein has argued convincingly that ClintonCare foundered because most American voters have health insurance they are satisfied with. In theory, they support a government health care program--but when they are confronted by the details of how their health care will change, that support evaporates.
Neither Obama's legacy, nor the economy's performance, will be much affected by what has happened in these early days. The real test for both will be how he handles the tough choices ahead.

I don't worry about the Obama legacy and if he has a chance to a amount to any kind of leader he will push thoughts of legacy to the back burner.
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,855
660
113
50
TX
partisanship is one thing .. you can't be serious... are you ? if you are.. God bless you.. let's go back to the last 8yrs... line forms to the anti- American EXTREME RIGHT....NO rush, don't think you'll need to take a #....:kiss:

In his first 100 days he has taken over the banks, the American Car industry, trying to take over the healthcare industry, raised my taxes, talked shit about the disabled, murdered more babies...etc...

He killed some Pirates that deserved it is the only thing I agree with him on.

What did Bush do that was so bad? He lowered my taxes and kept us safe since 9/11 that was Clinton's fault, whats not to like?
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
I give him a B so far. Same thing I gave Bush. Bush fell way down later, need not say more.
I believe O took over as many smarter then me say. At the worst time any Prez had to. And is moving in right direction.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,487
165
63
Bowling Green Ky
I give him a B so far. Same thing I gave Bush. Bush fell way down later, need not say more.
I believe O took over as many smarter then me say. At the worst time any Prez had to. And is moving in right direction.

I don't know Dave--much easier to take mediocre team up than keep a champion on top.

When run for office you can say you have the solutions and are looking forward not back--however if things don't work- you can immediately revert back to--
"Number one, we inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit. ... That wasn't me."


--by the way have you heard Pelosi or any Dems commenting on worst economy since great depression since they took over in 07.
:)
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top