shared sacrifice

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,483
157
63
Bowling Green Ky
Wonder which is more laughable the 5million new jobs prior to winning (reduced now to 3 mill) mostly in the privite sector--or I'm not for big gov rhetoric :SIB

from abc today--

It's A Good Time To Work For Uncle Sam

Posted by Declan McCullagh

President Obama's call last year for "shared sacrifice" doesn't extend to federal employees, at least based on the details of his administration's 2010 budget released this week.

At a time when the official unemployment rate is nearing double digits, and 6.35 million people are receiving unemployment benefits, the U.S. government is on a hiring binge.

Executive branch employment ? 1.98 million in 2009, excluding the Postal Service and the Defense Department ? is set to increase by 15.6 percent for the 2010 fiscal year. Most of that is thanks to the Census Bureau hiring 102,000 temporary workers, but not counting them still yields a net increase of 2 percent in one year.

There's little belt-tightening in evidence in Washington, D.C.: Counting benefits, the average pay per federal worker will leap from $72,800 in 2008 to $75,419 next year.
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,715
290
83
53
Belly of the Beast
So, if we exclude the post office and the DoD, and we don't count the census employees that weren't in the budget last year, the number of employees are up 2%

and the average salary if you include the benefits (so that the insurance companies can rake everyone over), the average wage leaped about 4%

Wonder what it would be if the benefits weren't included. . . . ? I bet the author knows - Wonder why she didn't include it.

. . . . leaped - lol
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
So, if we exclude the post office and the DoD, and we don't count the census employees that weren't in the budget last year, the number of employees are up 2%

and the average salary if you include the benefits (so that the insurance companies can rake everyone over), the average wage leaped about 4%

Wonder what it would be if the benefits weren't included. . . . ? I bet the author knows - Wonder why she didn't include it.

. . . . leaped - lol

So true. So much of the cost is the benefits. If we could cut out health care that would bring the cost way down.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,483
157
63
Bowling Green Ky
So, if we exclude the post office and the DoD, and we don't count the census employees that weren't in the budget last year, the number of employees are up 2%

and the average salary if you include the benefits (so that the insurance companies can rake everyone over), the average wage leaped about 4%

Wonder what it would be if the benefits weren't included. . . . ? I bet the author knows - Wonder why she didn't include it.

. . . . leaped - lol

Not sure Bobby--but she didn't mention the 102,000 census people and Acorn/Gumby ties either. :)
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top