tough call.
Martin wasn't, truly, in possession of the puck and there was a bit of evidence that the blow was to the head.
NHL has changed, lately.
Any blows evidencing intent to injure are viewed very harshy.
The rules have changed and I imagine that is what is reflected by these "polls" that suggest that many people believe that the hit was legitamite.
The fact that no referee called the play, immeditately, is irrelevant.
That is the way they are calling things now...Cherry be damned.
Good in some ways, but it sure changes the way that hockey was when I first started viewing it, some 35 years ago.
Hope Havlat is okay.
Tough call, either way.
Perhaps, as mentioned, the NHL is going the way of the NBA, where calls become the discretion of those wearing the stripes.
That's still what I can't make sense of in the NBA--I've been trying to figure this shit out, but the foul calls seem to introduce a greater ambiguity.
Hendrix bless the home-court advantage...the NBA clearly applies the greatest Machine Gun.
just MO