- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
:mj07:it`s a huge fricking loss for the potus(and OUR country) both domestically and internationally.....
....now this disaster in which the pres.deluded himself into thinking he could sway the i.o.c. delegates with his lofty rhetoric and will cause our allies serious concern regarding negotiations with iran and n. korea....
:mj07:
I always picture Nathan Thurm when I'm reading Weasel's posts...
![]()
"I know that. I just think it's so funny that you think I wouldn't know that."
AGREE:00hour
I almost want to have your wife clean my toilet so you have something to eat tomorrow.
Sheezz Wayne Don't take it out on me because they are grifters :shrug:I have no comment from this or GW's last comment. You can read your own silliness and argue with your self from now on.
:sadwave:
Wease, it is seriously amazing to me that you think this is considered some kind of tremendous loss for either our country or for Obama. To the point of jeopardizing our standing or his ability to conduct foreign policy negotiations. Seriously? You really think that?
If that's the case, then had the IOC awarded the event to Chicago, it would have been because of Obama swaying them, and all these foreign countries would just fall at his feet and he would control future negotiations and situations with them?
Do you realize how ridiculous that is? It the freaking Olympic games, and decisions had probably been made long ago, for the most part. The Australian IOC member made reference to the Asian bloc attempts, which makes sense. Obama is from Chicago, thought it might help to go there, it probably did add a little something to our effort, nothing more, nothing less.
The mountain you guys are making out of this molehill is laughable. Except for being so patently sad, that is. I think it's pretty cool that Rio was awarded the games - first time in South America, and kind of what the Olympic spirit is all about. Why does this have to be such a negative bunch of political bullshit for you guys?
Ray, it really is shocking that you are such a failure in life and have to be supported by your wife. I just can't figure out why that is.
The great Presdient fails again! The world spits in obama face again, obama is a joke in the eyes of the world , and most of the united states!
ONE WORD WEAK AND A BIG FAT ZERO:sadwave:
I CAN NOT WAIT UNTIL THIS LOSER GONE!
IT CAN NOT COME FAST ENOUGHT!
A SAD DAY TO BE AMERICANWENT A PRESIDENT CARES ABOUT SPORTS MORE THAN A WAR GOING ON!
THS GUY SHOULD BE H- - G FROM A CHERRY TREE
HE NOT FRIEND OR A LEADER TO AMERICAN PEOPLE, ONE WORD A REAL JACK ASS
I am suprised from the applause and giddyness from the right over this.
/QUOTE]
because they love defeat / surrender / retreat
Obama found out the CITIZEN of the WORLD thinks he's a Piece of Shit.
![]()
JMHO.
The great Presdient fails again! The world spits in obama face again, obama is a joke in the eyes of the world , and most of the united states!
White House: Opposing Obama's Olympics Lobbying Is Unpatriotic or Something
Earlier this week, House Republican Leader John Boehner criticized Obama's Olympics lobbying jaunt to Copenhagen. "Listen I think it's a great idea to promote Chicago but he's the president of the United States, not the mayor of Chicago," Boehner said. "And the problems we have here at home affect all Americans and that's where his attention ought to be." RNC Chairman Michael Steele also said he wanted the Olympics to come to Chicago, but thought that "at a time of war, at a time of recession ... this trip, while nice, is not necessary for the president." Maybe, just maybe, it would have made more sense to focus on winning the war in Afghanistan than winning the Olympics for Chicago.
On Tuesday, the White House struck back. Press Secretary Robert Gibbs falsely implied that Steele opposed bringing the Olympics to Chicago:The official White House blog also claimed that "In the past, hosting the Olympics has been a source of pride and unity for the country." Actually, that's not always been true: In 1972 60 percent of Coloradans voted against hosting the 1976 Olympics. But the facts weren't really important. The point was that White House wanted you to know that if you opposed bringing the Olympics to Chicago--or even criticized Obama's trip to Copenhagen--you didn't really have "pride" in your country (unlike Michelle Obama, who might have been proud of her country for the second time in her adult life had Chicago won).
"Who's he rooting for? (Laughter) Is he hoping to hop a plane to Brazil and catch the Olympics in Rio? (Laughter.) Maybe it's Madrid."
I was rooting for Rio. The United States has hosted the Olympics eight times before. Not a single South American country has ever hosted the games. Isn't it only fair for Brazil to get its day in the sun? And after declaring that "no world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will succeed," wasn't it hypocritical for the most powerful man in the world to jet to Copenhagen to demand his country get the Olympics for the 9th time?
Wouldn't it have been smart diplomacy for Obama to have opted not to throw his weight around? Or does "smart diplomacy" only involve sacrificing our interests and the the interests of our democratic allies to appease our autocratic adversaries?
Furthermore, 45 percent of Chicagoans oppose bringing the Olympics to Chicago (47 percent were in favor). Presumably opponents have reasons other than a deep-seated hatred of America for wanting to see the city fail in its bid? Or does the White House think Chicagoans who don't want the games are unpatriotic, too? It seems that, like Obamacare, the more people learned what hosting the Olympics really means -- higher taxes, heavy traffic, more corruption -- the less support there was. So, I was wrong to write this morning that Chicago lost. It didn't lose. Neither did America. Obama's cowboy diplomacy lost. And I cheered.
Posted by John McCormack on October 2, 2009 06:25 PM
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.