Baker:
Had the better season, but not demonstatively better.
Had a 15-9 record. (solid)
Had an average ERA 4.36, however had a very impressive 1.19 ratio.
Struck out twice as many hitters as Porcello, which is important in a one game play-in, (obviously to score you need to put the ball in play.)
Like the Twins with Porcello, the Tigers hit Baker as well. Currently this Tiger lineup is 77 for 266 lifetime (.289) however the ration isn't bad (.325 OBA against) Has started aginst the Tigers 4 times this season, going 1-1 with two ND's, and not looking good in either one of them.
ARE U GUYS WATCHN THE SAME GAMES I AM - THERE IS NO VALUE EITHER STAT WISE OR COMMON SENCE WISE TO JUSTIFY A WAGER ON THE TIGERS - THERE RELIEF WHICH HAS BEEN SO GOOD EVEN SUCKS AS OF LATEI
THUNDER. I could not agree more with you. Not sold on a play on the Tigers just getting a bad feeling seeing all of the detractors and now distractions. Majority on Twins line not moving at all. If i take a wager on the Tigers it will be because I am going against everything that looks too good to be true. :shrug:
LINE OPENED AT 150 AND WILL BE 170-175 BY GAME TIME -THE UNDER IS A GOOD PLAY
LINE OPENED AT 150 AND WILL BE 170-175 BY GAME TIME -THE UNDER IS A GOOD PLAY
Line closed at -152.
And all those people that waited for DET +1 miillion or +170 are gonna end up -100 for each hundo risked...
And all those people that waited for DET +1 miillion or +170 are gonna end up -100 for each hundo risked...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.