Five worst deals of MLB offseason so far...

IE

Administrator
Forum Admin
Forum Member
Mar 15, 1999
95,440
223
63
FoxSports.com ---


1. The Astros sign Brandon Lyon to a three-year, $15-million contract.

To justify giving Lyon three years and $15 million requires a grave misunderstanding of, well, the game of baseball. Lyon, like most unspectacular relievers, has been wildly inconsistent throughout his career. But the Astros, who work daily to distinguish themselves as the worst organization in baseball, seemingly believed in the 2009 version of Lyon. Indeed, last season Lyon posted a 2.86 ERA, but he did so despite some of the weakest peripheral numbers of his career. In other words, he was lucky. The Astros, despite all evidence to the contrary, are gambling that Lyon will continue to be lucky for the next three years. If they're going to throw that much at Lyon, then why wouldn't Ed Wade have just given Jose Valverde, a much better reliever than Lyon, the multi-year deal he sought?

2. The Diamondbacks trade Max Scherzer and Daniel Schlereth for Edwin Jackson and Ian Kennedy.

Scherzer has blazing stuff and 240 strikeouts in 226.1 major-league innings. As well, he's still just 25 years of age, and he has less than two years of service time. Jackson, meanwhile, is a year older and already deep into his arbitration years. In essence, the Snakes sacrificed upside and cost control for ... what? (This from the organization that will likely send Mark Grace and Todd Stottlemyre deferred-salary checks until the mountains crumble into the sea.) Schlereth, meanwhile, has a dominating minor-league dossier and the makings of a shutdown reliever at the highest level. As for Kennedy, he's at best an adequate fifth starter, but he'll likely wind up as something less useful than that. It's difficult to get worse and more expensive in one move, but Arizona did just that.

3. The Cubs trade Milton Bradley for Carlos Silva.

GM Jim Hendry fouled up this one from the moment of conception. It's unwise to sign a player like Bradley -- mercurial, complicated, in need of care and feeding -- if you're going to subject him to suffocating media coverage and a fan base that's increasingly hostile. It's just a poor fit, and any sensible operator should be able to foresee the troubles ahead. Suffice it to say, Hendry was unable to do that.

The best (i.e., least damaging) thing would've been to release Bradley, absorb his remaining contract and thereby treat him as a sunk cost. Instead, Hendry flipped him for a pitcher -- Carlos Silva -- who's demonstrably and significantly worse than Bradley and, like Bradley (but less famously and less often), something of a problem child. On a pure numbers level, Hendry swapped a right fielder with a .378 OBP in his down year of 2009 for a starting pitcher who has one season in the last four that can't be described as awful.

Of course, Hendry could've released Bradley and given him $50 million in gold bullion, and Bradley still would have been less damaging to the Cubs' hopes than Alfonso Soriano, who'll be around for another five years and another $90 million.

4. The Angels sign Fernando Rodney to a two-year, $11-million contract.

Will this stand as the Angels' signature addition of the winter? They've let John Lackey sign with an AL rival, and they've let Chone Figgins sign with an AL West rival. And their rejoinder to those losses has been to ink a declining Hideki Matsui and ... Rodney? Last season, Rodney piled up the saves, but he did so in spite of a 4.40 ERA and grisly walk rate of 4.9 per nine innings. Throw in Rodney's declining strikeout rate and spotty health history, and it's hard to fathom why the Angels think he's worth two years and $11 million. Simply put, you don't pay money for saves, which, as a statistic, is a lousy way to measure value. But the Angels appear to have done just that.

5. The White Sox trade Jon Link and John Ely for Juan Pierre.

The same affliction that led the White Sox to believe Scott Podsednik was a talent to be leaned upon as often as possible has now led them to trade for Pierre. Pierre would make a perfectly useful fourth outfielder. He is not, however, an adequate major-league regular. Still, the White Sox have penciled him in as their starting left fielder in 2010. Left field, as you know, is a power position, and Pierre, as you know, has no power. That vaguely adequate .757 OPS he posted last season -- his highest such mark since 2001 -- will also likely come down. He's moving into the tougher AL; his season was built around one hot month (May); and his batting average on balls in play, a bit on the high side last season, will probably come back to earth. With it, so will the rest of his numbers.

As for Pierre's speed, it's an asset, but he's not an efficient base-stealer these days. Yes, he pilfers a lot of bases, but he also gets caught too much. In fact, in his nine full seasons he's led the league in times caught stealing on five occasions. In reality, he's something close to a break-even base stealer (you have to be successful at least 75 percent of the time to make stealing bases even slightly worthwhile). Of course, Ozzie Guillen will probably let him run wild. He'll swipe a lot of bases, but he'll be a solidly below-average hitter. Defensively, he doesn't take proper routes in the outfield, which means you can't put him in center on an extended basis.

Sure, the Dodgers will pay $10.5 million of the remaining $18.5 million that Pierre is owed, but if Link and Ely, the two pitching prospects given up by Chicago (both with success in the upper rungs of the system) turn out to be of consequence, then this deal will look even worse.
 

kegray1

Benneteau fan
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2004
9,663
9
0
53
Houston
Well I agree and disagree with #1.
I agree it is the Astros but I disagree on the player signed.
It has been said that Valverde was not the most popular guy in the clubhouse and he blew saves.
Lyon had 15 saves in 17 chances last year so I got no issues with that signing.
That Astros TERRIBLE signing was giving money to Pedro Feliz at 3B. They already have Jeff Keppenger as the vet at 3rdB along with Geoff Blum. The problem is they have a younger guy in Chris Johnson who is ready to get MLB at bats at 3B since this team is going nowhere this year.
Maybe Feliz can play some SS since Tejada is gone,but they are saying Feliz has been brought in to play 3B. :shrug:

1 year $4.5 to a guy who is coming in at a crowded position on a team going nowhere this season.:shrug:
At least the Lyon signing was a position that was vacant when they made it.
 
Last edited:

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,190
130
63
berlin md
Kegray I like Lyon as well, but no way he should have gotten a 3/15 deal.

They should have signed him to 2/10 deal tops.

That third year is going to come back and haunt them.
 

kegray1

Benneteau fan
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2004
9,663
9
0
53
Houston
Kegray I like Lyon as well, but no way he should have gotten a 3/15 deal.

They should have signed him to 2/10 deal tops.

That third year is going to come back and haunt them.

I doubt it will. This team has no young talent and they are playing the waiting game to get rid of Carlos Lee's terrible deal and for Berkman's deal to run out as he has fallen off so badly.
Also waiting to get crappy Kaz Matsui salary off the books.
It will be 3 season at the earliest this team contends again.
The reason Ed Wade signed Lyon is simply because Owner told him not to come back from the winter meetings without a closer of some sort.
They also signed Matt Lindstrom for cheap which I thought was a steal as he is a nice bullpen guy.

They should be looking to unload Oswalt for young can't miss prospect because he is the only guy of value on the team and like I said they are going nowhere the next two seasons and Oswalt will be on the wrong side of his career by then.
Also Oswalt is on record as saying he doesn't want to pitch much longer.
 
Last edited:

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,190
130
63
berlin md
Berkman has an option for 15 million in 2011, do the astros not pick that up in your opinion?


He would be a good fit for an Al team on a two three year deal, the ability to dh should help him.

I agree about trading Oswalt, he has been one of my favorite pitchers to watch and should be done the favor of being traded to a contender.

The dodgers would seem like a good place to trade him.

I think the astros may have traded for Lindstrom but I am not positive, if it was a trade they did not give up much for him.

The astros system has been bare for years now, they do need to just go into a rebuild mode.
 

kegray1

Benneteau fan
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2004
9,663
9
0
53
Houston
Berkman has an option for 15 million in 2011, do the astros not pick that up in your opinion?

That is going to be a tough call as the owner and the town both love him.
Another average season and the smart thing is to say goodbye.
 

BUCSnotYUCKS

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 6, 2007
11,839
28
0
40
Ohio but not a Buckeye
My Braves trade with DET involving Renteria a couple years back has to be one of the worst off-season deals in a long time :00hour

I think the Tigers struck gold in their 3-way trade. Granderson is vastly overrated, and they got some great talent in return with Jackson, Scherzer, and Schlerith.
 

IE

Administrator
Forum Admin
Forum Member
Mar 15, 1999
95,440
223
63
The Cubs have come to terms with free agent outfielder Marlon Byrd on a three-year, $15 million contract, reports Chris De Luca and Gordon Wittenmyer of the Chicago Sun Times.

Jim Hendry doesn't have the best track record for multi-year contracts with outfielders, of course, so inking a 32-year-old outfielder doesn't come without some risk. Age and terms aside, perhaps the biggest concern is how Byrd will respond to leaving the Ballpark at Arlington. Byrd had an .873 OPS at home last season compared to a .740 OPS away. :shrug:
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
The Cubs have come to terms with free agent outfielder Marlon Byrd on a three-year, $15 million contract, reports Chris De Luca and Gordon Wittenmyer of the Chicago Sun Times.

Jim Hendry doesn't have the best track record for multi-year contracts with outfielders, of course, so inking a 32-year-old outfielder doesn't come without some risk. Age and terms aside, perhaps the biggest concern is how Byrd will respond to leaving the Ballpark at Arlington. Byrd had an .873 OPS at home last season compared to a .740 OPS away. :shrug:

Thats just not a good deal for the Cubs.
 

TON

Bank on it
Forum Member
Jun 12, 2005
1,798
3
0
49
Chicago
White Sox get Pierre

I like the move, podsednik was a below avg player. Pierre however hold a .300 lifetime avg

as far as LF being a power position, i agree it is, but if you have power at other "non power " spots i think your ok

But realistically, you could get 15+ H.R.'s at every spot except pierre's

Konerko, Beckham, Alexi, Teahan

Rios, Quintan, A.J.

As a White Sox fan, i'll take the trade
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top