sure is quiet here

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,850
655
113
49
TX
:shrug: still licking your wounds :yawn:

I have been in such a good mood since Tuesday;)

I am so glad my party now has some say in the way business is conducted in Washington. maybe we can meet in the middle and get things accomplished now. :)
 

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,189
130
63
berlin md
Usual amount of posts in here today, but hedge has to go and lie again about shit.

Hey hedge what do you think of the right turning on Beck?

What about Brown's comments about his daughters? If that was a dem who said that you be all over him, and rightfully so.

But its okay when Brown said it?
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,850
655
113
49
TX
Usual amount of posts in here today, but hedge has to go and lie again about shit.

Hey hedge what do you think of the right turning on Beck?

What about Brown's comments about his daughters? If that was a dem who said that you be all over him, and rightfully so.

But its okay when Brown said it?

I did not like the comments about his girls:shrug:
I like Beck:toast:
 

Hard Times

Registered
Forum Member
Jan 17, 2005
809
0
0
Poor Hedgehog

Poor Hedgehog

:shrug: still licking your wounds :yawn:

I have been in such a good mood since Tuesday;)

I am so glad my party now has some say in the way business is conducted in Washington. maybe we can meet in the middle and get things accomplished now. :)

Why would anyone bandy words with a damn fool, you have accomplished nothing if you get the better of a damn fool .... you toot your horn about a republican winning the senate seat in Massachusetts and while doing so you have lost all of your freedoms today as a Bush appointee , JUDGE ROBERTS RULED ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE BOUGHT AND PAID FOR SUPREME COURT BY THE CORPORATE ELITE JUST ruled that the FUCKING CORPORATIONS can spend all the money in the world to get someone elected, you will see the day that this was a black day in history. You just don't get it .... politicians are not for you . You have been totally fucked and you don't even know it !!
 
Last edited:

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,850
655
113
49
TX
Why would anyone bandy words with a damn fool, you have accomplished nothing if you get the better of a damn fool .... you toot your horn about a republican winning the senate seat in Massachusetts and while doing so you have lost all of your freedoms today as a Bush appointee , JUDGE ROBERTS RULED ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE BOUGHT AND PAID FOR SUPREME COURT BY THE CORPORATE ELITE JUST ruled that the FUCKING CORPORATIONS can spend all the money in the world to get someone elected, you will see the day that this was a black day in history. You just don't get it .... politicians are not for you . You have been totally fucked and you don't even know it !!

he saved us from hellcare and maybe he will turn for the middle instead of ruling from the far left...:00hour
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
WHile I don't know all of the angles on this ruling today - allowing corporations to fund candidates and elections seems to be about as bad a thing as I can think of, if everyone is serious about the current state of affairs and politicians.

To me, public funding and term limits have to be square one and two to reforming our political process right now. Allowing corporations to buy elections and undercut candidates that don't carry their water is a very dangerous precedent, in my initial opinion. I don't care which side of the fence you stand on. I don't really see the first amendment as being the real issue here, corporations are not individuals, and that's what this is all about, isn't it?
 

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,189
130
63
berlin md
WHile I don't know all of the angles on this ruling today - allowing corporations to fund candidates and elections seems to be about as bad a thing as I can think of, if everyone is serious about the current state of affairs and politicians.

To me, public funding and term limits have to be square one and two to reforming our political process right now. Allowing corporations to buy elections and undercut candidates that don't carry their water is a very dangerous precedent, in my initial opinion. I don't care which side of the fence you stand on. I don't really see the first amendment as being the real issue here, corporations are not individuals, and that's what this is all about, isn't it?


This is way over hedge's level of intelligence.

I was shocked by this decision. It repeals the Mccain Feingold act.

This country is already run by corporations now it is going to be more upfront about it.

This country has been dying a slow death over the last decade now we get to see who is really controlling us.

If you are a candidate not willing to sacrifice your beliefs for what the big corporations want you to do you have no chance to win with this decision.
 

rusty

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2006
4,627
11
0
Under a mask.
This is way over hedge's level of intelligence.

I was shocked by this decision. It repeals the Mccain Feingold act.

This country is already run by corporations now it is going to be more upfront about it.

This country has been dying a slow death over the last decade now we get to see who is really controlling us.

If you are a candidate not willing to sacrifice your beliefs for what the big corporations want you to do you have no chance to win with this decision.

I dont know Chad.The American people still gotta vote.Funding by corporations seems odd,but if they have the money and support that candidate whats so illegal about that.America at its finest I guess.
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,850
655
113
49
TX
WHile I don't know all of the angles on this ruling today - allowing corporations to fund candidates and elections seems to be about as bad a thing as I can think of, if everyone is serious about the current state of affairs and politicians.

To me, public funding and term limits have to be square one and two to reforming our political process right now. Allowing corporations to buy elections and undercut candidates that don't carry their water is a very dangerous precedent, in my initial opinion. I don't care which side of the fence you stand on. I don't really see the first amendment as being the real issue here, corporations are not individuals, and that's what this is all about, isn't it?


I do 100% agree with you on term limits. I say 2, 4 year terms, just like the President then adios. :sadwave:
 

RAYMOND

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2000
45,594
902
113
usa
:shrug: still licking your wounds :yawn:

I have been in such a good mood since Tuesday;)

I am so glad my party now has some say in the way business is conducted in Washington. maybe we can meet in the middle and get things accomplished now. :)

:00hour :00hour :00hour :00hour :00hour :00hour
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
Glad you got out of jail Raymond, there are to many phony liberals on this board, they try to be P/C to get their ATTABOYS. Pity really.

jmho

Thank you Skully,

But as I have said before,

I AM NOT A LIBERAL, I AM NOT A CONSERVATIVE, I AM A LIBERTARIAN

I don't hide or portray to be anything but on this board. I served my country PROUDLY AND HONORABLY ! If you want to continue to make false assertions about my character, it only makes you look more more foolish. You continue to worship false idols such as Beck and the rest of the Fauz Noize crew, they will keep marching you and the rest of the lemmings straight to the slaughter house, and that is the same for the MSNBC and CNN worshippers. Do some research on the hosts of their anchors. Anderson Cooper is a Vanderbildt, CIA Operative. Becky is bought and paid for. The only host on Fox worth a shit is Judge Napolitano.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top