Rams won't sign No. 1 pick

IE

Administrator
Forum Admin
Forum Member
Mar 15, 1999
95,440
223
63
This is nuts kinda money for Bradford!

_______________________________


The No. 1 pick in the NFL draft will not be signed before Thursday's first round, sources told ESPN's Adam Schefter on Friday.

The St. Louis Rams and expected top pick, quarterback Sam Bradford, will not have a contract in place before the draft.

The Rams don't think they need to have the player signed and Bradford has been hesitant to complete a deal.

The contract for the No. 1 overall pick will likely be staggering. Bradford's contract is expected to pay him an average of $13 million a season with roughly $50 million in guaranteed money. These figures are based on the past two drafts, when Matt Ryan and Matthew Stafford were the first quarterbacks picked.

Two years ago, the Falcons' Ryan received $34 million in guaranteed money on a deal that averages $11 million a season. Stafford, who was picked No. 1 last season by the Lions, received $42 million in guaranteed money on his deal, which averages $12 million a season.

The Rams know the numbers and think the player will sign eventually. Bradford wants to see how the draft plays out and if a team such as Cleveland trades up to get him. Such a scenario could provide him with more leverage.

___________________________

Bradford is reportedly not willing to sign a pre-draft contract because he wants to see if the Browns make a move up the board to get him. Doing so would essentially cost Cleveland its entire draft.
 

Destructor D

Destructor
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2005
8,695
176
63
Kansas City, MO
A lot of money for a guy who really didn't play last year and IMHO is still questionable with regards to being a decent NFL QB. It's easy to pass when you have the best line in college football which Bradford enjoyed in 2007 and 2008. In 2009, he had a rebuilding OL and was hurt in the 1st half of the 1st game...

My guess is Bradford is a decent NFL QB, but never anything special.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
A lot of money for a guy who really didn't play last year and IMHO is still questionable with regards to being a decent NFL QB. It's easy to pass when you have the best line in college football which Bradford enjoyed in 2007 and 2008. In 2009, he had a rebuilding OL and was hurt in the 1st half of the 1st game...

My guess is Bradford is a decent NFL QB, but never anything special.

I read that Bradford compares favorably to Aikman.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top