General McChrystal?s Burning Contempt for the Puppet Obama

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
General McChrystal?s Burning Contempt for the Puppet Obama

Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com <SUP>[1]</SUP>
Wednesday, June 23, 2010

The farce that is the war in Afghanistan is coming apart at the seams. General Stanley McChrystal?s sharp comments about Obama, Biden, and the administration published by Rolling Stone are not so much about disrespect, as the script-reading corporate media talking heads would have it, but rather about a policy in disarray in Afghanistan.


Obama the wunderbar teleprompter reader (and little else) is instructed to push the completely untenable prospect that the United States can win the so-called war in Afghanistan, a country often referred to as the graveyard of empires. The British, the Russians, Alexander the Great, and Genghis Khan either fell to the Afghans or made painful concessions. The British suffered one of their greatest military defeats in the Khyber. 16,500 British soldiers and civilians, retreating after defeat in Kabul, were slaughtered by the Afghans. One person was spared to tell the story.

The establishment knows it cannot ?win? in Afghanistan and the claim the U.S. military is there to defeat the Taliban and al-Qaeda is nothing but transparent propaganda.
Afghanistan is a black hole sucking up men and machinery for the sake of death merchant profiteers. It is valuable real estate to be held ? not conquered ? real estate where opium grows for the sake of CIA off-the-books operating capital funding covert wars against enemies of the global elite. The fantastic profits earned from opium also flood the coffers of the masters of the casino economy on Wall Street. As Catherine Austin Fiits has documented, without this influx of laundered underground and illicit money Wall Street would have collapsed long ago.

After the so-called Afghanistan assessment was supposedly leaked to the CIA?s favorite newspaper last year ? the report recommended in Pentagon-speak securing the population, aiding in providing good governance, building and mentoring the Afghan security forces ? McChrystal threatened to resign if he was not provided with resources to accomplish the mission.



<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ztrM8Y5To-c&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ztrM8Y5To-c&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>


In other words, McChrystal said he needs more troops, something our rulers will not do. Not because it is politically unpopular, but because the mission in Afghanistan is not to win. The unstated mission is to chew up men, resources, and a lot of money loaned out by international banksters. The mission is to keep an unwinnable conflict on low heat indefinitely, or at least until the United States collapses from the crushing debt burden.

McChrystal made his opinion about the corporatization of the ?war? known in April when he criticized the use of private-sector contractors. ?I actually think we would be better to reduce the number of contractors involved.? He suggested increasing the number of troops ?if necessary,? or ?using a greater number of Afghan contractors, or Afghans to help with the mission,? according to the Boston Globe.

Instead of acting as the CEO of a floundering occupation designed to last forever, McChrystal hinted he would resign. ?Three officers at the Pentagon and in Kabul told McClatchy that the McChrystal they know would resign before he?d stand behind a faltering policy that he thought would endanger his forces or the strategy,? it was reported last September.

Now McChrystal and his boys are making sarcastic and derogatory ? even adolescent ? remarks about Obama and Biden in the presence of Rolling Stone journalists.

McChrystal realizes this behavior will likely result in his forced resignation. He has obviously arrived at a decision to publicly express his contempt for Obama and the administration.

Contempt for the Chicago Mafia errand boy and accomplished teleprompter reader is now a popular sport not only in Washington but around the country. He will likely go down as the most reviled puppet of the ruling elite in modern history.

Another marionette awaits behind the curtain.
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
Obama Fires McChrystal, Selects Petraeus to Oversee Opium Fields in Afghanistan

Obama Fires McChrystal, Selects Petraeus to Oversee Opium Fields in Afghanistan

Obama Fires McChrystal, Selects Petraeus to Oversee Opium Fields in Afghanistan

Kurt Nimmo
Prison Planet.com <SUP>[1]</SUP>
Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Obama fired General Stanley McChrystal today and replaced him with the globalist General David Petraeus. Obama said McChrystal?s actions undermined civilian control of the military and asked the Senate to confirm Petraeus immediately.

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VJaApTr5Onw&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VJaApTr5Onw&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>


In announcing Petraeus? nomination, Obama said institutions are stronger than individuals. One wonders what Thomas Jefferson would have to say about that statist assertion.

The new overseer of the opium fields in Afghanistan attended the Bildberger confab held in Spain this year <SUP>[2]</SUP> and also attended the secretive meeting in Greece last year <SUP>[3]</SUP>.
Since Petraeus is a seasoned establishment insider, his appointment is a natural. He is a member of the one-world CFR <SUP>[4]</SUP>. The CIA?s favorite newspaper, the Washington Post <SUP>[5]</SUP>, listed Petraeus as number eight on its list of ?Top 100 Global Thinkers.?

In April Petraeus? name was floated as a possible presidential candidate. ?Neocon warmongers love Petraeus. The American Enterprise Institute ? one of a handful of neocon think tanks behind the push to invade Iraq and kill a million plus Iraqis ? bestowed its 2010 Irving Kristol Award on Petraeus. The late Kristol is considered to be the godfather of the neocon movement,? we wrote at the time.

?He?s a serious guy,? declared the ?hawk? (neocon) Rep. Pete King <SUP>[6]</SUP> in October. ?He?s about the only one out there who could really challenge Obama, who isn?t as strong as he was a few months ago? I think he?s an independent, and I haven?t talked to him about this, but I?d encourage him? I?d be open to it.?
Democrat Peter Beinart <SUP>[7]</SUP> of the Council on Foreign Relations has compared Petraeus to Eisenhower, the last general president (who incidentally warned about the influence of the military-industrial complex). The GOP, argues Beinart, will ?need someone with enough personal appeal to avoid the culture war food-fights that obsess the Republican base, someone who exudes moral traditionalism and fiscal prudence without appearing fanatical or intolerant.?

In other words, somebody who is not associated with the Tea Party and other political threats to the establishment.

Petraeus? party affiliation is a mystery but he has been courted by both parties as a modern-day Eisenhower, the San Francisco Chronicle <SUP>[8]</SUP> claims. Both Republicans and Democrats love the General.

Not that party matters ? when it comes to forever war both sides of globalist one party system agree it is imperative the Pentagon attack small countries and slaughter grade school children, grandmothers, and wedding party members. Afghanistan?s opium is a prize that must be retained and controlled.

Petraeus? presidential aspiration was put into serious jeopardy after he ?fainted? <SUP>[10]</SUP> during a Senate hearing on the war on Afghanistan a few days ago. It is speculated that he actually had a seizure <SUP>[11]</SUP>.

Petraeus was instrumental in the illegal invasion of Iraq. He assumed command of USCENTCOM and was responsible for U.S. operations in 20 countries from Egypt to Pakistan, including Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. He has thrown his support behind Obama?s ?Afghanistan strategy,? that is to say endless war against an enemy created by the CIA and an ever-increasing body count of innocent civilians.

In short, he is perfect for the forever war in Afghanistan.

No sooner was Petraeus selected than John McCain <SUP>[8]</SUP> said he will pressure him to abandon Obama?s ?arbitrary? July 2011 withdrawal date and instead base troop drawdown on the current conditions in Afghanistan.
<HR style="TEXT-ALIGN: center" class=Divider>Article printed from Prison Planet.com: http://www.prisonplanet.com
URL to article: http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-f...s-to-oversee-opium-fields-in-afghanistan.html

URLs in this post: [1] Prison Planet.com: http://www.prisonplanet.com
[2] Spain this year: http://bilderberg2010.com/dolce-hot...e-invitees-based-on-2009-greece-meeting-list/
[3] in Greece last year: http://alligatorfarm.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/bilderberg-meeting-2009/
[4] one-world CFR: http://www.dailypaul.com/node/40827
[5] Washington Post: http://www.prisonplanet.com../establishment-grooms-outsider-petraeus-for-presidential-bid/
[6] Rep. Pete King: http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1009/Pete_King_rides_oneman_Petraeus_bandwagon.html
[7] Peter Beinart: http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-10-12/petraeus-for-president/?cid=hp:mainpromo4
[8] San Francisco Chronicle: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=66423
[9] Image: [10] ?fainted?: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/06/15/the-official-word-on-petraeus-faint-dehydration/
[11] had a seizure: http://www.dailypaul.com/node/137710
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top