Climate Change: A Failed Attempt To Establish ?Scientific Dictatorship?

Lumi

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
Climate Change: A Failed Attempt To Establish ?Scientific Dictatorship?

Mark Daniels

Global Political Awakening
August 31, 2010

Of course, the truth about ?global warming? has been reported for decades by alternative media sources such as Infowars.com (click here to search the archive). GlobalResearch.ca recently published an article, Global Warming and CO2 Emmissions, in which Jorge Figueiredo, outlines certain established facts about global warming.

The list of alternative media sources, books and articles exposing the hoax is endless.

The current debate revolves around an investigation by the InterAcademy Council (IAC), a consortium of national scientific academies, which has released documents exposing the numerous errors contained within United Nations? reports on climate change.

The Wall Street Journal article, Probe Seeks Climate-Panel Changes, reported that a group investigating the United Nations?

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will recommend in a report Monday that the scientific organization beef up its capacity to ferret out errors in its scientific assessment..

Fox News presented an expose? on the topic entitled, The Green $windle. Fox News launched its attacks on Global Warming years ago in an effort to discredit politicians on the ?Left?.

Surprisingly, the latest report admits that the real purpose of the ?global warming hoax? is to establish a global dictatorship via a ?global carbon tax? and ?cap and trade? regulation.
The following segment explains:

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mb9oOEEnXt0&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mb9oOEEnXt0&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>



Click here to view the entire broadcast on YouTube!




Well, it certainly appears that the United Nations? request for the IAC investigation is an admission of the IPCC?s fraudulent attempt to impose carbon regulations world wide. The United Nations has apparently realized that ?We The People? are not buying what they have been trying to sell.
We can look forward to the UN changing the strategy for the establishment of a ?global scientific dictatorship? by repackaging the ?climate change? agenda.
http://www.efoodsdirect.com//index.html?aid=13&adid=43
It is time to Wake Up! You too, can join the ?Global Political Awakening?!
Resources:


The Great Global Warming Blunder: How Mother

Nature Fooled the World?s Top Climate Scientists
ir

Climate Cover-Up: The Crusade to Deny Global Warming
ir

Climate Confusion: How Global Warming Hysteria Leads to Bad Science, Pandering Politicians and Misguided Policies That Hurt the Poor
ir

Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist?s Guide to Global Warming (Vintage)
ir

Climategate: A Veteran Meteorologist Exposes the Global Warming Scam
ir

The Deniers: The World Renowned Scientists Who Stood Up Against Global Warming Hysteria, Political Persecution, and Fraud**And those who are too fearful to do so
ir

Heaven and Earth: Global Warming, the Missing Science
ir

Global Warming False Alarm: The Bad Science Behind the United Nations? Assertion that Man-made CO2 Causes Global Warming
ir

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming (and Environmentalism)
ir

The Real Global Warming Disaster: Is the Obsession with ?Climate Change? Turning Out to Be the Most Costly Scientific Blunder in History?
ir

UNDERSTANDING THE GLOBAL WARMING HOAX: EXPANDED AND UPDATED
ir

Global Warming Hoax DVD Trilogy
ir

A LAYMAN?S GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING THE GLOBAL WARMING HOAX
ir

Global Warming False Alarm: The Bad Science Behind the United Nations? Assertion that Man-made CO2 Causes Global Warming
ir

The Great Global Warming Swindle (DVD)
 
Lumi

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
UN climate change panel to be warned over reports

UN climate change panel to be warned over reports

UN climate change panel to be warned over reports

The United Nation's climate change organisation faces a warning over how it uses scientific facts in its influential reports, following the discovery of a series of embarrassing errors in its work.


By Richard Gray, Science Correspondent
Published: 9:30AM BST 29 Aug 2010

A review of the practices of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been conducted in response to intense criticism of the body, whose reports are used by governments to inform policy decisions on global warming.

The findings of the review are due to be handed to the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon tomorrow.

Conducted by a committee of representatives from the world's leading scientific bodies, the analysis is expected to recommend a number of changes to the way the IPCC compiles and checks its extensive 1,000 page reports.
The committee, which is made up of scientific organisations that form the InterAcademy Council, is also expected to recommend changes to help the IPCC keep its reports, which take around six years to complete, more up to date with current science.
Evidence given to the committee has also called for a tightening of the way facts and references are checked before the reports are published.
The IPCC has been under scrutiny after it admitted making an error in its 2007 report, that stated Himalayan glaciers could melt to a fifth of current levels by 2035 ? a statement that was wrong by over 300 years.
The panel has also been criticised over the sources of information it used to compile the report after a number of statements were found to be based on information taken from reports by environmental lobby groups, magazine articles and student dissertations.
Climate change sceptics have seized upon the mistakes and non-scientific sources of information, using it to question the validity of the IPCC's conclusions that humans are causing the climate to change.
Climate scientists insist the conclusions are still robust.
Professor Robert Watson, the chief scientific adviser to the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and a former chair of the UN's IPCC, told the InterAcademy Council's review committee that more needed to be done to prevent errors appearing in the panel's reports.
He described the way the IPCC handled the mistakes as "totally and utterly atrocious" and suggested that the panel should consider hiring additional staff to check through the sources of information, or references, to ensure the accuracy of statements made in future reports.
In the evidence he gave to the committee, Professor Watson said: "No error is acceptable, but there is such a thing as human error.
"Is there a better way of checking all the references before they go out? Maybe there is a role for the secretariat, that effectively, by hiring additional staff ? maybe even graduate students and post docs (doctoral) ? they can follow through the whole reference chain.
"A normal peer review will not have time to do this, so how can we double and triple check the reference chain of any particular statement?"
He added that the IPCC needed to find a way of making corrections rapidly when mistakes are made.
The IPCC, which has started work on its fifth report on climate change, is still to issue a formal correction to the error on the Himalayan glaciers, nearly nine months since it first came to light.
The error emerged after the panel was revealed in January to have used unsubstantiated figures on glacial melting on the mountain range that were contained within a report by conservation charity WWF.
It has been claimed that officials knew about the mistake as early as November last year.
Professor Mike Hulme, a professor of climate change at the University of East Anglia, is due to deliver a keynote lecture to the Royal Geographical Society Annual conference this week in which he will call for a dramatic changes to the way the IPCC operates.
Speaking ahead of his lecture, he said: "The IPCC has not sufficiently adapted to the changing science and politics of climate change, nor to the changing expected and demanded role of science and expertise in society.
"The IPCC's approach of seeking consensus obscures and constricts both scientific and wider social debates about both knowledge-driven and value-driven uncertainties that surround climate change politics."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Bet on MyBookie
Top