OT System

[Coach_K]

Last week record was 2-0 (New Hampshire and Tulane)

This week:
Play Against vs opponent
Central Michigan vs East Michigan
Marshall vs Bowling Green
Akron vs Kentucky

Teams in bold would be the bet if you follow this system.

Good luck

 

[Morris]

Thanks coach! :0008

 

[AR182]

Last week record was 2-0 (New Hampshire and Tulane)

This week:
Play Against vs opponent
Central Michigan vs East Michigan
Marshall vs Bowling Green
Akron vs Kentucky

Teams in bold would be the bet if you follow this system.

Good luck

Didn't Army also lose in ot last week to Hawaii ?

If that's the case, then N. tex. is a play....

Thanks Coach_K....

 

[Coach_K]

Didn't Army also lose in ot last week to Hawaii ?

If that's the case, then N. tex. is a play....

Believe Hawaii made the GW field goal with 7 seconds left in regulation so no play, but I just look at espn to see last week scores

 

[Coach_K]

OT system is now 4-1 I believe
This weeks plays would be:
Stanford -4.5 @ Notre Dame

Clemson also lost to Auburn but they have a week off, so play Miami on 10/2 vs Clemson

 

[Morris]

Clemson also lost to Auburn but they have a week off, so play Miami on 10/2 vs Clemson

Coach, I believe the system is only for plays the following Sat after a loss. I never tracked it after a two week layoff so I don't know what the numbers are. A two week span would give the teams enough time to rebound after a loss.

Thanks for doing this!:0008

 

[Coach_K]

I agree, plus Miami is playing this week so it chages the game. If Miami beats Pitt, I think they roll past Clemson, but wont count for record.

Stanford is now favored by 5, they should beat ND easily however I don't like betting against teams with significant home field advantage. There are a few stadiums/fields/courts in this country I would count as an extra man and South Bend is probably one of them. Be it the fans, refs, players more pumped, whatever. Will have to wait to see % on Stanford before I would play them.

 

[HoopsGuru]

being a huge ND fan I have to disagree with your thoughts on a huge ND home field advantage. You've got to be kidding me. half of the stadium is full of alumni who are between 60-85 yrs old and don't make a peep the entire game. The student section is good but that's only a fraction of the stadium. I wouldn't be so leary of laying the points with Stanford.

 

[Cie]

being a huge ND fan I have to disagree with your thoughts on a huge ND home field advantage. You've got to be kidding me. half of the stadium is full of alumni who are between 60-85 yrs old and don't make a peep the entire game. The student section is good but that's only a fraction of the stadium. I wouldn't be so leary of laying the points with Stanford.

Honestly, LSU is the same way. Season ticket holders in Baton Rouge are old, and getting older by the year. The past couple of years, I have actually had LSU fans seated behind me ask for me to sit down while the Tigers are on defense. I have even had someone bitch at me for standing on clutch defensive 3rd downs:facepalm:

It is still loud, but has dropped off significantly the past 5-7 years since LSU won the '03 title.

 

[Coach_K]

I hear you guys, it is more of the idea of coming to a place and playing, like the Big House or the Rose Bowl or Happy Valley, etc. 19 yo kids that have never been out of state and now they get to travel to say LA to play UCLA, it can be intimidating.

My other point was the officiating, being a Duke fan, I hear it all the time, we get all the calls especially at home. I think ND is the same way, they see more holding or pass interference on the other team. Just my opinion and wanted to clarify my reasoning.

Good luck gents!

 

[HoopsGuru]

again have to disagree with your reasoning again. 9times out of 10 the opposing team brings their conference's officials to notre dame stadium since notre dame is independent. i believe they didn't use big 10 officials for the nd-mich game but i rarely see them getting calls at home. i think the opposing teams usually play above their heads because its an "opportunity to play at notre dame on national tv". plus notre dame isn't a dominant home team like they were in the late 80's/early 90's.