...and am I crazy to think of maybe still taking the under?
JBCovers Registered User Forum Member Feb 4, 2010 392 0 0 Oct 10, 2010 #1 ...and am I crazy to think of maybe still taking the under?
H HoopsGuru Registered User Forum Member Jan 6, 2004 1,478 5 0 Oct 10, 2010 #2 I know i've seen 31 before. can't see how carolina will score 17 pts today.
JBCovers Registered User Forum Member Feb 4, 2010 392 0 0 Oct 10, 2010 #4 Well, I didn't really think it was the absolute lowest ever, but I'm still on the side of the game going under. Anyone else?
Well, I didn't really think it was the absolute lowest ever, but I'm still on the side of the game going under. Anyone else?
D djv Registered User Forum Member Nov 4, 2000 13,817 17 0 Oct 10, 2010 #5 At one time it was a play on over of the lowest o/u total of the week. Have not payed attention last 2/3 years. Sorry.
At one time it was a play on over of the lowest o/u total of the week. Have not payed attention last 2/3 years. Sorry.
R rocky mountain Registered User Forum Member Sep 24, 2005 6,956 1,417 113 Oct 10, 2010 #6 JBCovers said: Well, I didn't really think it was the absolute lowest ever, but I'm still on the side of the game going under. Anyone else? Click to expand... I like the under 17 in the first half better, and i played it.:0074
JBCovers said: Well, I didn't really think it was the absolute lowest ever, but I'm still on the side of the game going under. Anyone else? Click to expand... I like the under 17 in the first half better, and i played it.:0074
JBCovers Registered User Forum Member Feb 4, 2010 392 0 0 Oct 10, 2010 #7 Wow, even after 20 pts in the first quarter, it STILL went under...