CBB Thurs 3/19

Nole

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2002
16,626
241
63
63
Knoxville, Tn USA
after 75 first half points, blue devils hold siena to 22 second half points for the comeback win and a miracle push on the under. i'll take that!
Unreal! Had Siena +17 2nd half. Another push. Had USF under as well. Pushing all over the place. Can't complain though. Had USF +5.
 

Korn

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 15, 2000
3,530
10
38
Delta, BC
This part may be accurate. But i haven't POSTED a live play since March 4th, although I do still play them (and I won't post Live plays for the rest of the year in ANY sport and I'm still at a season high in units. What I'm saying is that your OVERALL breakdown is COMPLETELY INCORRECT. Please, once again, I've told you over and over again that i'm NOT going to seperate plays into different catagories and I don't need you to do it for me If you JUST wanted to say G/L or WTG that is fine, but your overall breakdown is simply NOT correct. There is NO way that I'm in the negative in pregame plays..........That is laughable.
Well in your threads you are negative/breakeven on pregame NCAAB plays. NBA you are positive on both! Like I said I've gone through all your threads.

Here is a bunch more of the live plays:

Nov 25 Arizona St +0.5 (2x) +2.0

Nov 28 UCSB -4' (2x) -2.2

dec 13 UMass -5' (3x) +3.0
dec 13 Nebraska +2 (5x) +5.0

dec 17 Bama Under 201' (10x) +10.0

dec 29 Missouri St -12' (5x) +5.0
dec 29 Missouri St Under 117' (5x) +5.0
dec 29 Purdue -42' (4x) -4.4
dec 29 Georgia -6' (10x) +10.0

dec 30 Temple -1 (5x) +5.0

dec 31 American -12 (3x) +3.0
dec 31 Clemson +2 (3x) +3.0
dec 31 UConn -18' (3x) +3.0

Jan 2 Le Moyne -16' (5x) +5.0
Jan 2 Michigan -21' (3x) +3.0

Jan 10 Georgetown +5' (3x) -3.3

Jan 24 San Diego St -4' (5x) +5.0

Jan 28 San Diego St -9' (4x) +4.0

Jan 30 Wright St -6' (10x) +10.0
Jan 30 Michigan -1' (4x) +4.0

Feb 3 Kent St +12' (5x) +5.0

Feb 4 Alabama M/L -133 (8x) +8.0

Feb 5 E Kentucky +3' (4x) +4.0
Feb 5 E Kentucky pk (4x) +4.0

Feb 10 Nebraska +11' (4x) +4.0
Feb 10 Iowa St -5 (4x) -4.4
Feb 10 San Jose St +9' (10x) +10.0

Feb 11 Tennessee -11 (8x) -8.8
Feb 11 Santa Clara -9' (8x) +8.0

Feb 14 Cal -8.5 4x +4

Feb 15 cincy -3.5 6x +6
Feb 15 charlestonn +2.5 6x +6
Feb 15 Monmouth +6.5 6x +6

Feb 16 NO -9.5 4x +4

Feb 25 LMU +3.5 8x +8

Mar 4
UAB -2.5 4x +4


GLGL
 

Smitty

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2005
8,183
2,777
113
Upstate NY
Well in your threads you are negative/breakeven on pregame NCAAB plays. NBA you are positive on both! Like I said I've gone through all your threads.
Seriously, wtf is wrong with you? How many times does he have to ask you to stay out of his thread?

If you're determined to track his record, fine, but do it in your own thread. Why can't you get that through your head?
 

steamfitter638

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 22, 2017
10
4
3
port st. lucie fl.
Well in your threads you are negative/breakeven on pregame NCAAB plays. NBA you are positive on both! Like I said I've gone through all your threads.

Here is a bunch more of the live plays:

Nov 25 Arizona St +0.5 (2x) +2.0

Nov 28 UCSB -4' (2x) -2.2

dec 13 UMass -5' (3x) +3.0
dec 13 Nebraska +2 (5x) +5.0

dec 17 Bama Under 201' (10x) +10.0

dec 29 Missouri St -12' (5x) +5.0
dec 29 Missouri St Under 117' (5x) +5.0
dec 29 Purdue -42' (4x) -4.4
dec 29 Georgia -6' (10x) +10.0

dec 30 Temple -1 (5x) +5.0

dec 31 American -12 (3x) +3.0
dec 31 Clemson +2 (3x) +3.0
dec 31 UConn -18' (3x) +3.0

Jan 2 Le Moyne -16' (5x) +5.0
Jan 2 Michigan -21' (3x) +3.0

Jan 10 Georgetown +5' (3x) -3.3

Jan 24 San Diego St -4' (5x) +5.0

Jan 28 San Diego St -9' (4x) +4.0

Jan 30 Wright St -6' (10x) +10.0
Jan 30 Michigan -1' (4x) +4.0

Feb 3 Kent St +12' (5x) +5.0

Feb 4 Alabama M/L -133 (8x) +8.0

Feb 5 E Kentucky +3' (4x) +4.0
Feb 5 E Kentucky pk (4x) +4.0

Feb 10 Nebraska +11' (4x) +4.0
Feb 10 Iowa St -5 (4x) -4.4
Feb 10 San Jose St +9' (10x) +10.0

Feb 11 Tennessee -11 (8x) -8.8
Feb 11 Santa Clara -9' (8x) +8.0

Feb 14 Cal -8.5 4x +4

Feb 15 cincy -3.5 6x +6
Feb 15 charlestonn +2.5 6x +6
Feb 15 Monmouth +6.5 6x +6

Feb 16 NO -9.5 4x +4

Feb 25 LMU +3.5 8x +8

Mar 4
UAB -2.5 4x +4


GLGL
Why would anyone go thru all trouble to look up someone’s record?!!?
 
  • Like
Reactions: boomer1

Korn

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 15, 2000
3,530
10
38
Delta, BC
Why would anyone go thru all trouble to look up someone’s record?!!?
Because some people like myself like to follow other's plays. So I look them up to see which ones I want to follow. Instead of capping the sport cap the capper. And now if you turn on WATCH thread at the top right you get instant notification so you can follow the Live plays.
 

Smitty

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2005
8,183
2,777
113
Upstate NY
Because some people like myself like to follow other's plays. So I look them up to see which ones I want to follow. Instead of capping the sport cap the capper. And now if you turn on WATCH thread at the top right you get instant notification so you can follow the Live plays.
Sounds like Junior has made you some money. So why do you keep pissing him off?
 

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
May 26, 2002
95,407
2,740
113
51
Canada
Why would anyone go thru all trouble to look up someone’s record?!!?

Because in the history of Madjacks.......


- The very few that actually keep a record, don't keep an accurate one

- Going all the way back to the beginning I'd say about 30 percent of records/wins/losses/profit/whatever you see posted are actually correct


I know this, going all the way back I have probably tracked the records of roughly 40-60 Madjackers. Very few are in the positive, very few. And again, almost any time a record is shown, it is bullshit.


Oh and then you have the ones that don't keep a record, that actually suck, but they brag that they win. Hell, they even have followers trying to back up the fact that they are great handicappers, when they are not. Can't tell you how many times in past two decades you have posters on here with big followings (lots of views) that are terrible handicappers, there have been a ton of them.


And then there is hammer1.:kurby





Note: For the record (pardon the pun) I have no clue if Junior44 record keeping is correct or not, I have not tracked any of his selections in any sport.
 

Korn

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 15, 2000
3,530
10
38
Delta, BC
Sounds like Junior has made you some money. So why do you keep pissing him off?
Not sure why he's pissed off. Would he also be pissed if I separated totals from spreads? He said I'm incorrect and calling me a liar so I'm just updating the live plays that he has posted.

GLGL
 

Junior44

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 2, 1999
10,388
3,684
113
58
San Diego, CA
Because in the history of Madjacks.......


- The very few that actually keep a record, don't keep an accurate one

- Going all the way back to the beginning I'd say about 30 percent of records/wins/losses/profit/whatever you see posted are actually correct


I know this, going all the way back I have probably tracked the records of roughly 40-60 Madjackers. Very few are in the positive, very few. And again, almost any time a record is shown, it is bullshit.


Oh and then you have the ones that don't keep a record, that actually suck, but they brag that they win. Hell, they even have followers trying to back up the fact that they are great handicappers, when they are not. Can't tell you how many times in past two decades you have posters on here with big followings (lots of views) that are terrible handicappers, there have been a ton of them.


And then there is hammer1.:kurby





Note: For the record (pardon the pun) I have no clue if Junior44 record keeping is correct or not, I have not tracked any of his selections in any sport.
Kick - I really dont think you are suggesting that my record keeping is incorrect. Either way, I stand by my record in all sports on my daughter's soul..........I only post to help others and to give back to MJ's. Absolutely no reason to post a bogus record, this isnt a contest. Cheers
 

MICHEAL

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 17, 2006
343
169
43
I think Korn should just play Junior44 picks instead of trying figure out the win/loss record, you could be counting your winnings instead of trying to figure out his record IMO it's like you're obsessed with it. It's a cool site been here a long time just don't be a bonehead. If you have plays good luck to you
 

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
May 26, 2002
95,407
2,740
113
51
Canada
If you're determined to track his record, fine, but do it in your own thread.


To be fair.....if there were threads that sole purpose was just to show you how a particular Madjackers was actually doing.......that could be cause mass chaos.😲

I mean just imagine you could click on any Madjacker username and truly see if they were in profit or not😲There would be members dying from shock, there would be members going into full psychiatric shock. Jack would probably have to shut down the site due to all the lawsuits coming his way.

Yep, it would be mass chaos.😲

The last thing you want is full transparency, when people really really know what is going on, they usually can't handle it. Madjacks has always been a place full of liars, bullshitters, cheaters, idiots, etc, etc, and we fucking love it. I mean do we really want this place being honest and accurate, fuck no we do not, absolutely not:smilies16
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: Smitty and Junior44

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
May 26, 2002
95,407
2,740
113
51
Canada
Kick - I really dont think you are suggesting that my record keeping is incorrect.

See post number 30 where I said.....

For the record (pardon the pun) I have no clue if Junior44 record keeping is correct or not, I have not tracked any of his selections in any sport.

As stated above, I take ANY MADJACKERS record with a "grain of salt", doesn't matter who it is, unless I track it myself, I just assume it is inaccurate.
 

T

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 1, 2012
10,924
1,396
113
To be fair.....if there were threads that sole purpose was just to show you how a particular Madjackers was actually doing.......that could be cause mass chaos.😲

I mean just imagine you could click on any Madjacker username and truly see if they were in profit or not😲There would be members dying from shock, there would be members going into full psychiatric shock. Jack would probably have to shut down the site due to all the lawsuits coming his way.

Yep, it would be mass chaos.😲

The last thing you want is full transparency, when people really really know what is going on, they usually can't handle it. Madjacks has always been a place full of HAMMER1, HAMMER1, HAMMER1, HAMMER1, etc, etc, and we fucking love it. I mean do we really want this place being honest and accurate, fuck no we do not, absolutely not:smilies16
FIXED
 

MICHEAL

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 17, 2006
343
169
43
Kick - I really dont think you are suggesting that my record keeping is incorrect. Either way, I stand by my record in all sports on my daughter's soul..........I only post to help others and to give back to MJ's. Absolutely no reason to post a bogus record, this isnt a contest. Cheers
I've made some money riding your coat tails. If I don't have time to research games, I will admit I will duplicate your plays or a mixture of Bad Angel/ Double / Loophole and a few others. I appreciate everyone sharing their thoughts
 
  • Like
Reactions: Junior44
Bet on MyBookie
Top